• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Protesting Spelling Bee

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: Gobadgrs
Anyone remember that freaky girl from a few years ago who would put her hands up over her mouth before saying each letter? They showed it on ESPN's cheap seats a couple of weeks ago

Yeah I saw that when it was live. That girl was a friggen spaz.

And for the poster wondering why this is on ESPN. They have carried it live for years now. not sure why, but I know it's been on there.
 
"I can't believe people are picketing against something this ridiculous," said contestant Steven Maheshwary, 14, of Houston.

14yr old nailed it.
 
Originally posted by: FrankyJunior
So evreething shud be spell'd fonetickly to make them hapy?

Yea, I think it's called ebonics...

😛


on a related note... Anyone have that email that travels the web, bascially converting english word into German speech??
 
Originally posted by: DaiShan
Originally posted by: spidey07
good GAWD! Did anybody take a gander at the kid in that link?

Yeah my bet is after the spelling bee he walked out with his check and was promptly beaten sensless and the check stolen.

I was just curious to find out what his ATOT handle was... 😉
 
doesnt it make just as much sense to demand a more strict use of spelling in all ascepts of life.
going by the argument put forth, it is just as likely that simplified "advertising" spelling (such as "thru" "lite" "ez") propogates positive reinforcement for improperly spelled words.
so they should picket the local mcdonalds drive-thru.
 
i actually think it's not a bad point. There is absolutely no reason to have the non-sensical spellings other than that's how it used to be.

Languages change, I mean people used to throw in y's and e's all over the place where they're aren't anymore. So why are we married to the spelling of rough other than how unappealing it looks to those who learned that spelling, to read it ruff?
 
Back
Top