Originally posted by: E equals MC2
Weapons of Mass Destruction is
Weapons of Mass Destruction are
which is it?????? I think it's ARE since 'Weapons' is the subject here.
Originally posted by: Saint Michael
Actually, usage differs between America and England. In England they prefer to think of singual nouns that represent multiple people as plural in verbal conjugations. Hence "the team were sitting" as opposed to "the team was sitting" in American English. I'd use the way appropriate to the country you're residing in.
Originally posted by: Davegod
Duo is plural, should be "were". However you can use "was" as a play on words, perhaps to make a point, e.g. Bennifer.
Originally posted by: Davegod
Duo is plural, should be "were". However you can use "was" as a play on words, perhaps to make a point, e.g. Bennifer.
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: Davegod
Duo is plural, should be "were". However you can use "was" as a play on words, perhaps to make a point, e.g. Bennifer.
Collective, not plural.
Originally posted by: hdeck
i've always used the singular verb for things like "the team" or "the duo" because it makes those multiple people into a single entity.
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Originally posted by: hdeck
i've always used the singular verb for things like "the team" or "the duo" because it makes those multiple people into a single entity.
Yup, in the US that is correct.
In the UK, they do things differently. They treat collective nouns as being plural.
If you notice, in the US we treat company names as singular entities, such as "Intel is try to market the CPU", whereas in the UK, they'd say "Intel are trying to market the CPU"
Originally posted by: CorCentral
Ok, here's one........
Which is correct?
1-- Sony are a good company?
2-- Sony is a good company?
3-- Sony be a good company? j/k
If #2, then why do so many people say "are"? Just lastnight I heard it twice watching 3 diff. news programs. I also see it all the time online.