• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Proof that math is wrong

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: aux
Yes, it's more or less the same flawed technique 🙂

As I said above:
This has something to do with the funny way the logarithm function (as an inverse of the power function) is defined in a complex domain, but the argument would be too technical for ATOT


Yep. This shows up a LOT when you're doing state-space solutions to controls problems or elasticity solutions with complex variables. For those of whom haven't had a lot of formal math, think about this.... the logarithm function is normally defined only for x > 0. BUT there is a logarithm of negative numbers... as well as a logarithm of complex numbers. But, given things like e^(Pi*i) = -1, you must define the logarithm VERY carefully in the complex plane.
 
Back
Top