Programming Humor :D

[manly]

I don't know the answer, but I'll point out that the length of the name of that function:

HashPasswordForStoringInConfigFile


is the same as of this:

supercalifragilisticexpialidocious


I propose that we use this is an upper limit on the reasonable length of identifiers.

Source:
http://arstechnica.infopop.net/OpenTopic/page?a=tpc&s=50009562&f=6330927813&m=4080918355

 

[Descartes]

Originally posted by: manly

I don't know the answer, but I'll point out that the length of the name of that function:

HashPasswordForStoringInConfigFile


is the same as of this:

supercalifragilisticexpialidocious


I propose that we use this is an upper limit on the reasonable length of identifiers.

Source:
http://arstechnica.infopop.net/OpenTopic/page?a=tpc&s=50009562&f=6330927813&m=4080918355

LOL 🙂

That really is a horribly named function, for reasons other than length.

 

[StraightPipe]

ehh

 

[Nothinman]

Guess noone can blame MS' dev team for being too terse =)

 

[dejitaru]

Altivec: Some assembly required.

don't know the answer, but I'll point out that the length of the name of that function:
HashPasswordForStoringInConfigFile
is the same as of this:
supercalifragilisticexpialidocious
I propose that we use this is an upper limit on the reasonable length of identifiers.

It would be nice if they were also anagrams.

 

[VicodiN]

'Programming' and 'humor' should never be put in the same sentence 😉

 

[dejitaru]

Originally posted by: VicodiN
'Programming' and 'humor' should never be put in the same sentence 😉

So it would seem. I've told quite a few jokes that people didn't "get".

 

[Spyro]

Originally posted by: dejitaru

Originally posted by: VicodiN
'Programming' and 'humor' should never be put in the same sentence 😉

So it would seem. I've told quite a few jokes that people didn't "get".

Same here, after the joke I always have to give a detailed explanation.