• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Programmable thermostat

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: C6FT7
Or you could be a cheapskate and stick with a T87F and a blanket! 😉
ahhaha i've seen plenty of those. 🙂

well wouldn't ya know it... calling around, everyone is fresh out of programmable thermostats. the one i linked to is on backorder at Canadian Tire and they have already issued 43 rain checks.

my wife already has a rain check for it for $30 so hopefully I can pick one up sometime before Dec. 1st to get that $15 credit.

edit: i'm going to call Home Depot and Rona to see if they have a comparable price.
 
Originally posted by: NascarFool
Originally posted by: Armitage
Originally posted by: NascarFool
Keep in mind that the bigger temperature difference will not save as much gas. You should set the temps within 5º. I run mine at 70º and 65º. Do the same for air conditioning. 😉

Eh? Reasoning/references?

The furthur the set points are spread, the longer the equipment has to run to catch back up. Another thing to think about is the furniture in the house only gets heated on the surface and eventually will get completely warmed (or cooled), therefore it takes longer for things to reach temperature and cause the equipment to run more.

I've heard this argument before, but never as more then a seat of the pants/urban myth type argument. Any research to back it up?

lower temperature = less heat transfer/loss = less energy use
 
Back
Top