Control Factor is on our brigade reading list.
But sure, get to know people that hate your way of life and will lie to you if necessary (taqiyya.) I had a muslim friend growing up. He was fairly westernized, liked video games and the same music as us. But his family drove an hour every week to attend a mosque, and if you asked him if everyone should be Muslim he'd tell you yes, they should be, and given enough time, everyone will be.
My mum would say that as well (that everyone ought to be catholic). Your point? Is my mum active in an underground network of catholics trying to bring the system down to replace it with their ideal vision of government?
I love the way you use the word "but" in this context.
But my mother attends church every week! I bet they're planning their nefarious schemes there!
All religions are hokum, but Islam is the most dangerous one at the moment. Muslims want the entire world to submit to their god. Those who refuse are to be killed, or if they're too useful to Muslim society, be treated as dhimmi, or second class citizens subject to high taxation and public abuse. Read the Bible, then read the Koran & Hadditha, and tell me which one conveys a message of peace and God's love.
I bet you haven't read either of those books. There's some pretty horrific content in the bible, and I bet there's equally horrific content in the Quran.
Personally I don't believe that any major organised religion (except probably Buddhism), their texts or their history stands up well to any serious, unbiased scrutiny. The problem usually starts when they start believing their stories so strongly that they mentally convert them from belief/faith into fact, and then it becomes, "I'm right and you're wrong", to people with different beliefs.
A secondary problem with some of the bible's content (I can't speak from a knowledgeable standpoint about the Quran), is age and context. For example, fighting and dying for what you believe in is sometimes appropriate. However, a responsible leader of any group of people would strongly advise caution and would weigh their words carefully in situations where an idea like that might come into play. Shaking a two-thousand-year-old book in the air and saying "it says it in here so it must be so", and being ready to die for your belief is just crazy for the vast majority of the bible's content.
Wikipedia reckons that 20% of the world population are muslims. A quick calculation from wikipedia's figures reckons that 31% of the world population are christian. Now please consider what kind of crazy situation the world would be in if 1 in 5 people had a "convert or die" mentality towards non-believers. I'm pretty sure that if 20% of the world population wanted to conduct a religious crusade, we would be in the middle of WW3 right now. If you can accept that those portion of the world's population cannot possibly have that sort of mentality, then it logically follows that not all muslims believe what you think they do.
Even if 1 in 5 muslims had that mentality there would still be a heck of a problem, that would be 278 million people on the planet want a religious crusade. I'm pretty sure that 278 million people is probably a higher total than all of the world's armed forces personnel and reservists. - Yep, just checked using Wikipedia's figures on the sizes of the world's armed forces, the total is nearly 93 million, so even with that figure, based on that estimate, there are 3 times more bloodthirsty "kill 'em all!" muslims waiting for some order from who-the-fuck-knows to unleash a holy crusade.
Even if all the heads of the christians religions started on a cleverly-planned campaign to spread propaganda to gather as many true-believers as possible for the "inevitable war with the muslims", I strongly doubt they would manage to gather at least 20% of their followers over any timespan (starting in this century).
Come on, show a little sense.