probability problem

Flammable

Platinum Member
Mar 3, 2007
2,602
1
76
You see a woman in the park with her son. She turns to you and says, "The other day, I came to this park with my two children, as they are all that I have."

What is the probability that her other child is a boy?

not homework
 

Leros

Lifer
Jul 11, 2004
21,867
7
81
It would seem 50/50 if the gender of a child is independent of other children the parents have had.
 
Dec 26, 2007
11,782
2
76
Originally posted by: Leros
It would seem 50/50 if the gender of a child is independent of other children the parents have had.

Well, that's if you only have male/females. What about transgendered? That just fucked your ratio all up...
 

Leros

Lifer
Jul 11, 2004
21,867
7
81
Originally posted by: DisgruntledVirus
Originally posted by: Leros
It would seem 50/50 if the gender of a child is independent of other children the parents have had.

Well, that's if you only have male/females. What about transgendered? That just fucked your ratio all up...

Lets assume she is crazy and would have drowned any transgendered children in her bathtub. There my 50/50 ratio is back. Take that!
 

Special K

Diamond Member
Jun 18, 2000
7,098
0
76
I'm going to go with 1/3. The starting sample space would be: {BB, BG, GB, GG}. You already know it can't be GG, so eliminate that possibility, leaving you with: {BB, BG, GB}.

The answer is therefore 1/3.
 

DrawninwarD

Senior member
Jul 5, 2008
896
0
0
Originally posted by: Special K
I'm going to go with 1/3. The starting sample space would be: {BB, BG, GB, GG}. You already know it can't be GG, so eliminate that possibility, leaving you with: {BB, BG, GB}.

The answer is therefore 1/3.

I think that would be the answer is you were trying to find out the probability that BOTH her kids are boys given that one of them is a boy.

You would be correct if the question was: What is the probability that her other child is also a boy?

I dunno, whatever.
 

sactoking

Diamond Member
Sep 24, 2007
7,648
2,924
136
Originally posted by: DrawninwarD
[I think that would be the answer is you were trying to find out the probability that BOTH her kids are boys given that one of them is a boy.

You would be correct if the question was: What is the probability that her other child is also a boy?

I dunno, whatever.

But that is the question.

You see a woman in the park with her son.
"The other day, I came to this park with my two children
What is the probability that her other child is a boy?

One boy is a given. Two children is given. Solve for P(child2)=boy s.t. child1=boy. You don't know if child1 or child2 is older. I believe Special K's answer is correct.

If you knew which child was eldest the probability would be 50%, but since you don't you have to include both GB AND BG as viable combinations, which changes the probability.
 

sponge008

Senior member
Jan 28, 2005
325
0
0
Originally posted by: Special K
I'm going to go with 1/3. The starting sample space would be: {BB, BG, GB, GG}. You already know it can't be GG, so eliminate that possibility, leaving you with: {BB, BG, GB}.

The answer is therefore 1/3.



That's only true though if people with any sons at all always go out to walk with their sons and not their daughters. Here, we can make the following reasonable assumptions:

-Of the people who came to the park that have two kids, half of these people have a boy and a girl, one quarter have two girls, and one quarter have two boys

-All of the people with two boys (1/4 of total) and half of the people with a boy and a girl (1/4 of total) that take one child with them will have a boy with them.

Thus, of those in the park with two children and one of them being a boy, half of them will have the other child being a boy, and half will have the other being a girl.

1/2 chance.


This seems like a degenerate case of "unfinished game" probability; try Googling it for more in-depth cases.
 

DrawninwarD

Senior member
Jul 5, 2008
896
0
0
Originally posted by: sactoking
Originally posted by: DrawninwarD
[I think that would be the answer is you were trying to find out the probability that BOTH her kids are boys given that one of them is a boy.

You would be correct if the question was: What is the probability that her other child is also a boy?

I dunno, whatever.

But that is the question.

If that was the question, it would've said: What is the probability that her other child is also a boy? The way I understand it, it's just asking what the missing kid's gender is regardless of the kid at the park, even though I'm guessing that wasn't the intended question.
 

sactoking

Diamond Member
Sep 24, 2007
7,648
2,924
136
Rather than edit my prior post, I'll just say that upon further review I believe the answer is 1/2. Special K is solving in the proper fashion but he, and I initially, didn't consider all possible options.

We know that the woman has 2 children. We know that one of them is a boy. That is all we know. There are no 'reasonable assumptions' can be made.

Special K posited that the possible combinations of children is {BB, BG, GB}. I agreed, under the thinking that since we don't know their relative ages BG and GB are distinct options. What I failed to consider is that under that same scenario, BB and BB are both distinct options. More specifically, B1B2 is different than B2B1. Thus, the full set would be {BB, BB, BG, GB}. The probability of two boys is 2/4 or 1/2.

This is using Special K's original set, which makes a bit of a logical fallacy by including both GB and BG. The logical fallacy is that he's introduced a new variable, age. Age wasn't part of the original scenario. Thus, the problem can be simplified down to a set of {B, G} which yields the expected result.
 

Special K

Diamond Member
Jun 18, 2000
7,098
0
76
Originally posted by: sponge008
Originally posted by: Special K
I'm going to go with 1/3. The starting sample space would be: {BB, BG, GB, GG}. You already know it can't be GG, so eliminate that possibility, leaving you with: {BB, BG, GB}.

The answer is therefore 1/3.



That's only true though if people with any sons at all always go out to walk with their sons and not their daughters. Here, we can make the following reasonable assumptions:

-Of the people who came to the park that have two kids, half of these people have a boy and a girl, one quarter have two girls, and one quarter have two boys

-All of the people with two boys (1/4 of total) and half of the people with a boy and a girl (1/4 of total) that take one child with them will have a boy with them.

Thus, of those in the park with two children and one of them being a boy, half of them will have the other child being a boy, and half will have the other being a girl.

1/2 chance.


This seems like a degenerate case of "unfinished game" probability; try Googling it for more in-depth cases.

It seems the answer depends to some extent on how you interpret the question:

Ask Dr. Math Example
Boy or Girl Paradox
 

sponge008

Senior member
Jan 28, 2005
325
0
0
Originally posted by: Special K


It seems the answer depends to some extent on how you interpret the question:

Ask Dr. Math Example
Boy or Girl Paradox



Essentially, if anyone that has a boy shows the boy, the chances of the other kid being a boy are 1/3. If the kid anyone shows is chosen at random, and you are looking at someone who randomly chose to show a boy, the chances of the other kid being a boy are 1/2. The OP's problem was in the latter category.

Here's an example from the former category:
http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/archives/001203.html
 

Paperdoc

Platinum Member
Aug 17, 2006
2,498
373
126
At first glance, the probability Is 0.50000.... because the gender of the second child is completely independent of that of the first; hence, the known gender of one child has absolutely no impact on the gender of the other.

However, it is known that, although males outnumber females at birth about 53:47, they also die off slightly more so that the total population has a male:female ratio of something like 46:54. At what age (during early childhood?) does that ratio pass through 50:50? I don't know. And I suppose that, since this is a Statistics problem, reality is not part of the discussion.
 

blinky8225

Senior member
Nov 23, 2004
564
0
0
1/3. Sample space is {BB, BG, GG}
P[BB] = 1/4
P[BG] = 1/2
P[GG] = 1/4
The prior probability is 1/4. However, we know that she has at least one boy.
The probability of BB given BX, where X can be any gender.
By Baye's Rule...
P[ BB | BX] = P[BB] / (P[BB] + P[BG]) = (1/4)/(3/4) = 1/3.
 

lizardth

Golden Member
Oct 5, 2005
1,242
0
76
Darn I thought this thread was going to be about a pot of petunias and a whale...
 

Fullmetal Chocobo

Moderator<br>Distributed Computing
Moderator
May 13, 2003
13,704
7
81
Originally posted by: lizardth
Darn I thought this thread was going to be about a pot of petunias and a whale...

This. :D

Wait, no. lizardth, that was the improbability drive. This is a problem operating in normality.