- Jul 25, 2004
- 3,816
- 1
- 81
First of all, I love Prison Break, it's one of my favourite shows and I can't wait for the 2nd season. But here is my issue with it:
Lincoln Burrows is innocent because he never shot Mr Steadman, but he went into that car park with every intention of killing the man. Does this really make him that much better than whoever really did kill him (
)?
So these people desperately defending him, including Michael, are knowingly defending a man, even risking their lives for him, with the knowledge that he genuinely was going to kill Terrance. Anyone else have a problem with this?
Lincoln Burrows is innocent because he never shot Mr Steadman, but he went into that car park with every intention of killing the man. Does this really make him that much better than whoever really did kill him (
even though no one actually did, as has been revealed
So these people desperately defending him, including Michael, are knowingly defending a man, even risking their lives for him, with the knowledge that he genuinely was going to kill Terrance. Anyone else have a problem with this?