Printer suggestions.

de8212

Diamond Member
Jan 2, 2000
4,021
0
76
I have a canon i850 that has lasted many years and done a very good job. From my memory there was a lot more selection of printers when I bought it as compared to now (at least ~200 price range).
I don't believe it was marketed as a photo printer but it used to make very good 4x5 and 5x7 prints.
Now I see numerous multifunction printers but really have no need for one (my wife has one anyway) not to mention I'm limited on space.

It won't be a dedicated photo printer but I certainly want it to be able to print pictures from time to time.


So what kind of printer do most of you use?
 

nerp

Diamond Member
Dec 31, 2005
9,865
105
106
Right now I'm using a black and white LaserJet 1018 for 99% of my printing and I'm so glad I finally got a B&W laser for the job. In terms of photos, I have an older HP Photosmart 375 for standard photo prints which works good enough for the majority of photo needs. I am in the market, though, for a nice but not too expensive inkjet for larger photo printing and for using card stock for greeting cards, signs, craft stuff, etc. I have loved Epson quality but loathe the cartridge clogging woes. I want something that can handle being unused for a month-and-a-half and not require 5 cleaning cycles to print normally.
 

djnsmith7

Platinum Member
Apr 13, 2004
2,612
1
0
It's interesting you should ask...My HP PSC 2410 (All in One) died on me recently & I needed to get a replacement...I've been using HP printers for a long time, but I wanted to try something else...

So for the first time in a long time, I decided to look at the new Epson line...I have to tell you, aesthetic wise, IMO, nothing even comes close...Performance wise, well, I've had it for a day now & it seems to run great...I haven't put it through the ringer yet in terms of full blown color photo testing on Glossy paper, but my day to day prints were flawless...If nothing else, their printers worth giving a look...

The resolutions are higher than the current HP's & the prices are much lower...I bought the Epson RX680 for $130.
 

de8212

Diamond Member
Jan 2, 2000
4,021
0
76
That epson looks nice but I would imagine it's way to big for the only place I have to put it.

 

djnsmith7

Platinum Member
Apr 13, 2004
2,612
1
0
Originally posted by: de8212
That epson looks nice but I would imagine it's way to big for the only place I have to put it.

That's cool...Just thought I'd share my experience / opinion...I'm sure you'll find one that works for you...
 

de8212

Diamond Member
Jan 2, 2000
4,021
0
76
Originally posted by: djnsmith7

That's cool...Just thought I'd share my experience / opinion...I'm sure you'll find one that works for you...

I appreciate it. Just for kicks, since you own it, what is the smallest size surface it will fit on? IOW is the actual bottom that makes contact with the surface pretty big or is it tapered down?
 

djnsmith7

Platinum Member
Apr 13, 2004
2,612
1
0
You're in luck because I have my measuring tape with me today...lol

The unit is approx.

18"W
20"D
13"H (w/ Paper Holder fully extended)

It's roughly the same size as the HP 2410...
 

de8212

Diamond Member
Jan 2, 2000
4,021
0
76
Thanks, that is really helpful. I would have to do major rearranging to fit it somewhere on my desk though. :(

 

Zepper

Elite Member
May 1, 2001
18,998
0
0
I recently bought an HP OfficeJet K5400. A lot of printer for the under $125. that I paid for the tn version (extra paper feeding tray). But if you do a lot of duplexing, get the one with the duplexing unit. Flipping the stack and running it back thru doesn't work well on this, but I've done it. There is no function in the software driver to do it, but there is on all their printers that don't have an available duplexing accy - draw any conclusions. And the current Acrobat reader can help with duplexing. As .PDFs are mainly what I need duplexing for, then I can get by. It's much cheaper to get the machine with the duplexer than to buy it later... :(

It does much better on photos than what you might glean from the several reviews I've seen. There is an Advanced Settings screen that allows you to adjust ink delivery volume. They default to a fairly low setting to make the cost per page look better, but adjust up one notch for photos. At least that setting works fine here. Photo printing is much slower than it was on my Canon iP4300, but the quality is plenty good for me - probably not for a pro or prosumer, but they wouldn't even be considering this type of unit anyway.

Drawbacks: big, noisy and sometimes misfeeds (particularly when I try to duplex :( ) like all HP inkjets it seems... It misfeeds less when I let the one-side printed stack set for a good while and riffle it a few times before trying to feed it thru for the other side. HP inkjet users should train themselves to be expert rifflers ;) . All HP paper feeders seem to like thin paper better (20# or less), but you really need thicker for duplex to avoid bleed thru. Staples SKU 554638 24# seems to work well here. The K5400's manual comes as a .PDF on CD, so you will learn right away about manual duplexing. The cartridges for this have large or very large ink volumes and the OEM ones are expensive, but clones are available that make ownership reasonable for individuals. And you can always refill.

It seems that TechOnWeb.com or Provantage.com have the best prices on these - shipping is cheaper on TOW. But check the price search engines like Froogle or PriceGrabber, etc. anyway. And perhaps Dealighted.com may have a lead on a better deal. And always check for a discount code.

Oh, the prices at TOW have gone back up from the pre/post-Christmas period - the one I got is now nearly $50. higher, but still a good deal for a printer that comes in a 24x20x20 inch carton. The one for the duplexing models might be even larger though you don't need to get the extra paper feed tray. The dn is the one with only the duplexer (only available from Staples, I think) while the dtn has the duplexer and extra tray. The prices at Provantage are even better than at Christmas - $20. cheaper even. You can get the tn for less than the base model...

.bh.
 

0roo0roo

No Lifer
Sep 21, 2002
64,795
84
91
well inkjet selection has remained pretty static, low priced laser has become more prominent.

i don't see the need for inkjet much anymore really. laser has better text/cost for bw text.
with broadband and every department store from walgreens to walmart having online photo development access theres no need to make shoddy and expensive home print outs, just upload them to a developer and its ready in an hour:p no worries about fiddly expensive ink carts and such stuff, if it doesn't come out right, they gotta fix it not u.
 

Bill Kunert

Senior member
Oct 9, 1999
793
0
0
I have a Canon Pixma MP600 that I'm very pleased with. Excellent quality, quiet(even has a quiet mode if late night printing might bother a sleeping wife). PC Magazine has a review of the 610(this years model-same printer) on their website and it's ther pick. Many people complain about Epsons print heads clogging so I picked Canon and am very satisfied with my choice.
 

nerp

Diamond Member
Dec 31, 2005
9,865
105
106
djnsmith,

Do you think your epson will face clogging issues or has Epson addressed that issue in normal models? I know a older new epsons will generally work quite peachy for quite some time and only begin to clog up after a few months.
 

najames

Senior member
Oct 11, 2004
393
0
0
The last 2 HP printers I had both died within 2 months after the warranty ended, no more HPs for me. I have an Epson for my wife that is always plugged because she doesn't use it a lot. It seems to like to think it's out of ink when I know there's still ink left in the tank too.

I recently bought a Brother 5250DN laser printer and have been happy with it for 6 months. Once I set up a static IP adress for it anything can print to it. Another main reason I chose Brother is their Linux support.