- Aug 25, 2001
- 56,340
- 10,044
- 126
Since my other thread kind of meandered, this one is intended to be a strictly technical and price/performance discussion between the two platforms.
I guess, I'm thinking, that the RAM would be cheaper for the i3-8100, mobo price basically a wash, and the CPU more expensive than the APU. Case+PSU+SSD could be the same.
Does anyone have any (technical) preferences for one over the other? Preferably, this rig would not use a dGPU, both for cost and power-saving reasons. Gaming is not the intended purpose of the rig, but if it can, so much the better. (A point for the APU, I guess, but that effectively means requiring dual-channel RAM, too.)
Also, possibly consider the 2400G versus the i3-8350K, and overclocking (which requires, for AMD, at the minimum a B350 board, and for the Intel, a Z370 board)?
(As an aside, I really think that Intel should relax their OCing requirements, to allow the H370 to OC CPUs too, given that AMD allows OCing on B350 boards.)
I guess, I'm thinking, that the RAM would be cheaper for the i3-8100, mobo price basically a wash, and the CPU more expensive than the APU. Case+PSU+SSD could be the same.
Does anyone have any (technical) preferences for one over the other? Preferably, this rig would not use a dGPU, both for cost and power-saving reasons. Gaming is not the intended purpose of the rig, but if it can, so much the better. (A point for the APU, I guess, but that effectively means requiring dual-channel RAM, too.)
Also, possibly consider the 2400G versus the i3-8350K, and overclocking (which requires, for AMD, at the minimum a B350 board, and for the Intel, a Z370 board)?
(As an aside, I really think that Intel should relax their OCing requirements, to allow the H370 to OC CPUs too, given that AMD allows OCing on B350 boards.)