• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Presidental Rankings

dmw16

Diamond Member
So I was chatting with a coworker about the ranking of the US Presidents so I did a Wikipedia search and there was a list with all the presidents and their average ranking (by historians and political scientists). HERE is the link. One thing I found interesting under the notable achievements was the things the listed as George W Bush's achievements seem like quite the opposite. Any thoughts?
 
Originally posted by: dmw16
So I was chatting with a coworker about the ranking of the US Presidents so I did a Wikipedia search and there was a list with all the presidents and their average ranking (by historians and political scientists). HERE is the link. One thing I found interesting under the notable achievements was the things the listed as George W Bush's achievements seem like quite the opposite. Any thoughts?
Note that that column is titled "Notable achievements and failures".

I'm surprised he was ranked so highly. He will drop over time.
 
If you look near the bottom them show another more recent poll (2006) asking people how the last several presidents will be remembered, I think that's a slightly more accurate portrayal of Bush...
 
I think the rankings are based on mid term numbers before Iraq took a major turn to the worse.

His long term view will totally depend on what happens in Iraq.
Just as the view of Clinton changed after 9-11 the view of Bush may changer after he leaves.
 
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
I think the rankings are based on mid term numbers before Iraq took a major turn to the worse.

His long term view will totally depend on what happens in Iraq.
Just as the view of Clinton changed after 9-11 the view of Bush may changer after he leaves.

You're hopelessly optimistic.

Also: KKKLINTON!

 
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
I think the rankings are based on mid term numbers before Iraq took a major turn to the worse.

His long term view will totally depend on what happens in Iraq.
Just as the view of Clinton changed after 9-11 the view of Bush may changer after he leaves.

the view of clinton changed after 9/11? 😕
 
Originally posted by: miketheidiot
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
I think the rankings are based on mid term numbers before Iraq took a major turn to the worse.

His long term view will totally depend on what happens in Iraq.
Just as the view of Clinton changed after 9-11 the view of Bush may changer after he leaves.

the view of clinton changed after 9/11? 😕

Sure, after the Bush administration tried to re-write history to say that 9-11 was Clintons fault for not trying hard enough to kill Osama, even though Clinton came closer with a few missles than Bush has with an entire army...

And Phokus...

Originally posted by: Phokus

You're hopelessly optimistic.

Also: KKKLINTON!

Was this sarcasm?
 
Originally posted by: miketheidiot
the view of clinton changed after 9/11? 😕
Yes, the failings of his foreign policy and lack of efforts to track down and kill international terrorists came to light.
Had there been no 9-11 no one would have cared that his foreign policy was pretty much mess.

Name for me his major foreign policy success.
 
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Originally posted by: miketheidiot
the view of clinton changed after 9/11? 😕
Yes, the failings of his foreign policy and lack of efforts to track down and kill international terrorists came to light.
Had there been no 9-11 no one would have cared that his foreign policy was pretty much mess.

Name for me his major foreign policy success.

Off the top of my head...

Kosovo? Sure it's turned to hell since then but we did stop mass geniocide, at least temporarily...
 
Originally posted by: rudder
LOL how did dubya get to be 22?
Easy. That's the age his daddy helped him avoid the draft by getting him into the Air National Guard. After that, all he had to do was duck out on his obligations and responsibilities.

George W. Bush:

Born: July 6, 1946

Air National Guard pledge, 1968 (age 22):
I, George W. Bush, upon the successful completion of pilot training, plan to return to my unit and fulfill my obligation.
That was just a practice run in preparation for ducking out on all future oaths, obligations and responsiblities, including and especially this one:
I, George W. Bush, do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.
 
Originally posted by: Arcex
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Originally posted by: miketheidiot
the view of clinton changed after 9/11? 😕
Yes, the failings of his foreign policy and lack of efforts to track down and kill international terrorists came to light.
Had there been no 9-11 no one would have cared that his foreign policy was pretty much mess.
Name for me his major foreign policy success.
Off the top of my head...

Kosovo? Sure it's turned to hell since then but we did stop mass geniocide, at least temporarily...
Kosovo works, but it was rather minor in terms of its effects on us back home.
It?s one of those things we do because it?s the right thing to do.

But can you name a success that lead to us being safer?
 
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Originally posted by: Arcex
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Originally posted by: miketheidiot
the view of clinton changed after 9/11? 😕
Yes, the failings of his foreign policy and lack of efforts to track down and kill international terrorists came to light.
Had there been no 9-11 no one would have cared that his foreign policy was pretty much mess.
Name for me his major foreign policy success.
Off the top of my head...

Kosovo? Sure it's turned to hell since then but we did stop mass geniocide, at least temporarily...
Kosovo works, but it was rather minor in terms of its effects on us back home.
It?s one of those things we do because it?s the right thing to do.

But can you name a success that lead to us being safer?

can you name something bush has down to make us "safer?" I don't know about you, but I look around and I feel mighty unsafe, and thats before i even look outside our government and our citizenry.
 
Originally posted by: miketheidiot
can you name something bush has down to make us "safer?" I don't know about you, but I look around and I feel mighty unsafe, and thats before i even look outside our government and our citizenry.
Well there hasn?t been a terrorist attack against an American interest outside of Iraq or Afghanistan since 9-11. Compare that to one every 1 ½ to 2 years prior to 9-11.
 
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Originally posted by: miketheidiot
can you name something bush has down to make us "safer?" I don't know about you, but I look around and I feel mighty unsafe, and thats before i even look outside our government and our citizenry.
Well there hasn?t been a terrorist attack against an American interest outside of Iraq or Afghanistan since 9-11. Compare that to one every 1 ½ to 2 years prior to 9-11.

Terrorist attacks are over hyped, I rather encounter terrorist attacks on a daily basis then have to my freedom taken away. There are countries that experience terrorist attacks, genocide, mass rape every day yet the world doesnt blink (ex. Iraq, most of Africa, Israel, Afghanistan, etc.) We as Americans are so ignorant a lot of the time and the majority of us have the view that we are more valuable humans then others in the world... In the end everyone dies at some point in time so there is no difference. Everyone should be treated equally around the world nationalism and religion has caused so many pointless wars.
 
Give me a specific example of a freedom you don?t have today that you had pre 9-11.

And be specific, something that you can no longer do that you did before.
 
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Originally posted by: Arcex
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Originally posted by: miketheidiot
the view of clinton changed after 9/11? 😕
Yes, the failings of his foreign policy and lack of efforts to track down and kill international terrorists came to light.
Had there been no 9-11 no one would have cared that his foreign policy was pretty much mess.
Name for me his major foreign policy success.
Off the top of my head...

Kosovo? Sure it's turned to hell since then but we did stop mass geniocide, at least temporarily...
Kosovo works, but it was rather minor in terms of its effects on us back home.
It?s one of those things we do because it?s the right thing to do.

But can you name a success that lead to us being safer?

safer... like ignoring a memo that says "Bin Laden determined to attack inside the U.S."? 😛

Clinton's still one of the most popular former presidents, and I feel like his legacy will be largely defined by the economy and his impeachment.
 
Originally posted by: Arcex
Originally posted by: miketheidiot
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
I think the rankings are based on mid term numbers before Iraq took a major turn to the worse.

His long term view will totally depend on what happens in Iraq.
Just as the view of Clinton changed after 9-11 the view of Bush may changer after he leaves.

the view of clinton changed after 9/11? 😕

Sure, after the Bush administration tried to re-write history to say that 9-11 was Clintons fault for not trying hard enough to kill Osama, even though Clinton came closer with a few missles than Bush has with an entire army...

And Phokus...

Originally posted by: Phokus

You're hopelessly optimistic.

Also: KKKLINTON!

Was this sarcasm?

Uh... yes? I was making fun of people like ProfJohn who still can't get over clinton and needs to blame all the current bad news on the man 🙂
 
Originally posted by: rudder
LOL how did dubya get to be 22?

If you scroll down you'll see that of the 12 sources used to derive the scores, Dubya's score was only derived from two. One of those was a WSJ poll and the other was from 2002 when Dub was still riding the wave of popularity from 9/11.

Barring a miracle in Iraq and a mysterious, unexplained vanishing of the deficit, his score will drop over time.
 
Originally posted by: PrevaricatorJohn
Give me a specific example of a freedom you don?t have today that you had pre 9-11.

And be specific, something that you can no longer do that you did before.
How about the the right to freedom from unwarranted domestic spying under the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution:
Amendment IV (the Fourth amendment) to the United States Constitution is one of the provisions included in the Bill of Rights. The Amendment guards against unreasonable searches and seizures, and was originally designed as a response to the controversial writs of assistance (a type of general search warrant), which were a significant factor behind the American Revolution.

Text

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
It doesn't stop there. Bush called the Constitution, "just a goddamned piece of paper"

Alberto Gonzales, while still White House counsel, wrote that the "Constitution is an outdated document."

Through his various "signing statements," Bush has diminshed the rights of all Americans by holding himself above, apart and immune from the legitimate laws passed by our legal represenatives in Congress, even as he signed them into law.

This is NOT a fscking monarchy. I will not bow down to King George the Bushwhacko! :thumbsdown: :| :thumbsdown:
 
I really question if we are safer. Granted, we haven't had a terrorist attack on US soil, but how many terrorists have we bread in Iraq that will be knocking on our door when we do withdraw? We will leave a mess in Iraq for the same reasons we lost the war in Vietnam. You can't fight people's hearts and minds. And you can't fight an enemy that has no real infrastructure, at least not with a conventional army.
 
Originally posted by: ProfJohn

Well there hasn?t been a terrorist attack against an American interest outside of Iraq or Afghanistan since 9-11. Compare that to one every 1 ½ to 2 years prior to 9-11.

That's a strange definition of "safer". There were no internal US terrorist attacks from foreign jihadists between the first and second world trade center bombings. So, that was about eight years between internal attacks before, only one of which took place during Clinton's time in office. So in a sense the American population was pretty much "safe" anyway.

If you are talking about American interests outside the US, then you are talking about embassies and military targets, these are exactly the same types of targets that the insurgents in Iraq are going after, and which have always been targets. I fail to see how having an attack on a US embassy or military installation outside of Iraq every 1-2 years is somehow 'less safe' to America then having dozens, hundreds, thousands of attacks on similar American personnel and interests inside Iraq.

So, in conclusion:
Numbers of attacks on US soil by foreign jihadists during
Clinton's term: 1
Bush's term: 1

Numbers of attacks on US interests abroad (no, I really dont think that Yemen is functionally different then Iraq) during
Clinton's term: 4 or so? (USS Cole, embassy bombings, etc.)
Bush's term : 10,000,000#@$KJNOHJESUSWAYTOOMANY@:#L$J@):

Doesn't seem a load safer to me.

Oh, and you want to have a list of things I can't do now that I could do before? How about "not be wiretapped without a warrant". How about be guaranteed rights to that "Habeas Corpus" thing? (who knew that you could declare American citizens 'enemy combatants' too and strip them of that right!?! Wheeeee!) If you don't think those things either directly affect you through your rights as a citizen, or indirectly affect you in terms of the health of our constitution and the rule of law, then you are doing both yourself and your fellow citizens a grave disservice.
 
Harvey, specifically how does that effect the way you live your life?
Have you or anyone you know been spied on?

And BTW the laws that allow us to do the domestic spying have been around since the 1970s!!!! The national intelligence court (or whatever it?s called) was created by Jimmy Carter.
 
Originally posted by: Phokus
Originally posted by: Arcex
Originally posted by: miketheidiot
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
I think the rankings are based on mid term numbers before Iraq took a major turn to the worse.

His long term view will totally depend on what happens in Iraq.
Just as the view of Clinton changed after 9-11 the view of Bush may changer after he leaves.

the view of clinton changed after 9/11? 😕

Sure, after the Bush administration tried to re-write history to say that 9-11 was Clintons fault for not trying hard enough to kill Osama, even though Clinton came closer with a few missles than Bush has with an entire army...

And Phokus...

Originally posted by: Phokus

You're hopelessly optimistic.

Also: KKKLINTON!

Was this sarcasm?

Uh... yes? I was making fun of people like ProfJohn who still can't get over clinton and needs to blame all the current bad news on the man 🙂

Ah, I wasn't sure, I was gonna say, Clinton isn't racist, the man plays the sax fer cryin' out loud!


And in case anyone asks, yes, I too am being sarcastic (about the sax thing).
 
Back
Top