President Obama: Immigration bill coming this year

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Robor

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
16,979
0
76
Originally posted by: blackangst1
Originally posted by: Evan
Funny to see the wingnuts still not seeing the hole they're digging themselves with immigration. One minute they're all for legal immigration, the next minute they're saying they don't want bills that would legalize illegals, perhaps because the word "amnesty" is attached, who the hell knows. When an immigration bill is passed in 2010, and if Repubs are strongly opposed to it, they'll be a permanent minority in Congress until they move left. Using terms like anchor babies also helps the left's cause. Like stealing candy from a baby.

As someone who is INTIMATELY familiar of how legal immigration works in this country...I would be all for a bill that gave amnestly...with TWO caveats: the prospective immigrants go through the same background checks that legal immigrants do, and that they are NOT given citizenship immediately, but rather a conditional green card, just like legal immigrants do.

I'll add to that they be required to get in the *BACK* of the line and pay *ALL* of the fees and (hopefully) penalties. That reminds me... My wife and I have a big $$ fee coming up in about a month to go from a 2 year green card to a 10 year.
 

blackangst1

Lifer
Feb 23, 2005
22,902
2,360
126
Originally posted by: Robor
Originally posted by: blackangst1
Originally posted by: Evan
Funny to see the wingnuts still not seeing the hole they're digging themselves with immigration. One minute they're all for legal immigration, the next minute they're saying they don't want bills that would legalize illegals, perhaps because the word "amnesty" is attached, who the hell knows. When an immigration bill is passed in 2010, and if Repubs are strongly opposed to it, they'll be a permanent minority in Congress until they move left. Using terms like anchor babies also helps the left's cause. Like stealing candy from a baby.

As someone who is INTIMATELY familiar of how legal immigration works in this country...I would be all for a bill that gave amnestly...with TWO caveats: the prospective immigrants go through the same background checks that legal immigrants do, and that they are NOT given citizenship immediately, but rather a conditional green card, just like legal immigrants do.

I'll add to that they be required to get in the *BACK* of the line and pay *ALL* of the fees and (hopefully) penalties. That reminds me... My wife and I have a big $$ fee coming up in about a month to go from a 2 year green card to a 10 year.

Its not just the fee...its the administrative review too ;) We had to sit in 3 reviews over the course of a month. After that you have citizenship to look forward to, should you two decide to go that route.
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: OCguy
As long as the first paragraph of the bill includes one-way tickets home and the end of anchor-baby policies, I'm all for it. :thumbsup:

Agreed. None of this watered down shit. Enforce the laws and get rid of the anchor babies.

Small govt, damnit!!!

Oh... wait.

One of the primary responsibilities of the federal government is to protect the states/borders from invasion, and we're being invaded.

So what you're saying is that the government IS the solution. Got it.
 

thegimp03

Diamond Member
Jul 5, 2004
7,420
2
81
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: JS80
Originally posted by: Skoorb
It occured to me today that the solution to illegal immigration has been looking the country in the face for years. In the US we see hard-working people who want to be here and provide for their family but are not documented. We also see similar numbers (?) of people who are on welfare and not because they can't work but because hell they don't really care. I say trade them. Keep the illegals and for each welfare recip who gets sent off to the Yukon on some compound to learn to live off the land the country can give a greencard to the illegal. It's a win for everyone.

Send home the illegals and cut off welfare funding. Shit solves itself.

Pretty much hit that nail on the head. The solution is so simple, just do it. It's a problem that will fix itself.

He won't do that. Too many Hispanic supporters. If he does that he loses their vote. Considering the guy will just about say anything to get support from everyone, I'll be surprised if an "immigration bill" does anything about all the illegals suckling off the system.
 

spidey07

No Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
65,469
5
76
Originally posted by: Vic


So what you're saying is that the government IS the solution. Got it.

Don't try to trap me Vic. We're both smarter than that and I know you've read The Constitution. You're trying to group me with hardcore libertarians which I am not, and you most likely know that.
 

blackangst1

Lifer
Feb 23, 2005
22,902
2,360
126
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: OCguy
As long as the first paragraph of the bill includes one-way tickets home and the end of anchor-baby policies, I'm all for it. :thumbsup:

Agreed. None of this watered down shit. Enforce the laws and get rid of the anchor babies.

Small govt, damnit!!!

Oh... wait.

One of the primary responsibilities of the federal government is to protect the states/borders from invasion, and we're being invaded.

So what you're saying is that the government IS the solution. Got it.

I would say its the feds job to protect the country, yes.
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: Vic


So what you're saying is that the government IS the solution. Got it.

Don't try to trap me Vic. We're both smarter than that and I know you've read The Constitution. You're trying to group me with hardcore libertarians which I am not, and you most likely know that.

I don't think you're even remotely a libertarian, spidey.

And -- aside from an item prohibiting Congress from outlawing the importation of slaves until after 1808 -- there's absolutely nothing in the Constitution against or even about immigration. Quite the opposite, the Founding Fathers were counting on it with borders wide open.
 

Chaotic42

Lifer
Jun 15, 2001
35,325
2,468
126
Originally posted by: Vic
I don't think you're even remotely a libertarian, spidey.

And -- aside from an item prohibiting Congress from outlawing the importation of slaves until after 1808 -- there's absolutely nothing in the Constitution against or even about immigration. Quite the opposite, the Founding Fathers were counting on it with borders wide open.

Even if it breaks the laws of the very country they founded?
 

spidey07

No Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
65,469
5
76
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: Vic


So what you're saying is that the government IS the solution. Got it.

Don't try to trap me Vic. We're both smarter than that and I know you've read The Constitution. You're trying to group me with hardcore libertarians which I am not, and you most likely know that.

I don't think you're even remotely a libertarian, spidey.

And -- aside from an item prohibiting Congress from outlawing the importation of slaves until after 1808 -- there's absolutely nothing in the Constitution against or even about immigration. Quite the opposite, the Founding Fathers were counting on it with borders wide open.

Correct. As long as they became citizens. Nobody AFAIK has a problem with immigration and we all welcome it, it's the illegal part that they have a problem with.

But we have an invasion going on.
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Originally posted by: Chaotic42
Originally posted by: Vic
I don't think you're even remotely a libertarian, spidey.

And -- aside from an item prohibiting Congress from outlawing the importation of slaves until after 1808 -- there's absolutely nothing in the Constitution against or even about immigration. Quite the opposite, the Founding Fathers were counting on it with borders wide open.

Even if it breaks the laws of the very country they founded?

As many of them would have considered the current federal laws against immigration to be unconstitutional, yes.
 

TruePaige

Diamond Member
Oct 22, 2006
9,874
2
0
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: Chaotic42
Originally posted by: Vic
I don't think you're even remotely a libertarian, spidey.

And -- aside from an item prohibiting Congress from outlawing the importation of slaves until after 1808 -- there's absolutely nothing in the Constitution against or even about immigration. Quite the opposite, the Founding Fathers were counting on it with borders wide open.

Even if it breaks the laws of the very country they founded?

As many of them would have considered the current federal laws against immigration to be unconstitutional, yes.

The constitution was meant to be a living document and evolve.

Early on we needed immigration to thrive.

Now it could cause us to nose dive.
 

Chaotic42

Lifer
Jun 15, 2001
35,325
2,468
126
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: spidey07
But we have an invasion going on.

OH NOES TEH BROWN PEOPLES!! :Q

Maybe you don't see it as a problem, but many of us do. Not that Mexicans (or brown people as you lovingly refer to them) are bad, but that we can no longer be the dumping ground for every poor soul in the world, especially if they refuse to try and adapt to our culture.

Listen, I live in the horrible, evil, racist south and the main complaint I hear about the Mexicans pouring over the border is that on the whole they refuse to try and adapt. Also, the vocal minority of them who feel that they're entitled to be here and that we should adapt to their culture isn't doing them any favors.

Mexicans need to either fix their country and stay there or try and adapt to our country (obviously they will bring their own bits of culture over which is part of the greatness of America) and call themselves Americans.

Otherwise lets just get boats and ship the whole damned world over here. They can all have America and we'll all move to an empty Cancun. :beer:
 

First

Lifer
Jun 3, 2002
10,518
271
136
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: Vic


So what you're saying is that the government IS the solution. Got it.

Don't try to trap me Vic. We're both smarter than that and I know you've read The Constitution. You're trying to group me with hardcore libertarians which I am not, and you most likely know that.

I don't think you're even remotely a libertarian, spidey.

And -- aside from an item prohibiting Congress from outlawing the importation of slaves until after 1808 -- there's absolutely nothing in the Constitution against or even about immigration. Quite the opposite, the Founding Fathers were counting on it with borders wide open.

Correct. As long as they became citizens. Nobody AFAIK has a problem with immigration and we all welcome it, it's the illegal part that they have a problem with.

But we have an invasion going on.

Yes, an invasion of mostly Mexican immigrants looking for work, 97% of whom don't commit any serious crimes and all of whom provide a net economic benefit in the aggregate.

The humanity!
 

TruePaige

Diamond Member
Oct 22, 2006
9,874
2
0
Originally posted by: Evan
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: Vic


So what you're saying is that the government IS the solution. Got it.

Don't try to trap me Vic. We're both smarter than that and I know you've read The Constitution. You're trying to group me with hardcore libertarians which I am not, and you most likely know that.

I don't think you're even remotely a libertarian, spidey.

And -- aside from an item prohibiting Congress from outlawing the importation of slaves until after 1808 -- there's absolutely nothing in the Constitution against or even about immigration. Quite the opposite, the Founding Fathers were counting on it with borders wide open.

Correct. As long as they became citizens. Nobody AFAIK has a problem with immigration and we all welcome it, it's the illegal part that they have a problem with.

But we have an invasion going on.

Yes, an invasion of mostly Mexican immigrants looking for work, 97% of whom don't commit any serious crimes and all of whom provide a net economic benefit in the aggregate.

The humanity!

Sales Tax - Services Rendered + Benefit to Employer - Detriment to Citizen (those who could of had that job) + Filling of unfilled/unfillable positions - % in Prison - Housing Inflation - Government Housing + Labor to construct housing

Still equals a net negative in most cases.
 

First

Lifer
Jun 3, 2002
10,518
271
136
Originally posted by: TruePaige
Originally posted by: Evan
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: Vic


So what you're saying is that the government IS the solution. Got it.

Don't try to trap me Vic. We're both smarter than that and I know you've read The Constitution. You're trying to group me with hardcore libertarians which I am not, and you most likely know that.

I don't think you're even remotely a libertarian, spidey.

And -- aside from an item prohibiting Congress from outlawing the importation of slaves until after 1808 -- there's absolutely nothing in the Constitution against or even about immigration. Quite the opposite, the Founding Fathers were counting on it with borders wide open.

Correct. As long as they became citizens. Nobody AFAIK has a problem with immigration and we all welcome it, it's the illegal part that they have a problem with.

But we have an invasion going on.

Yes, an invasion of mostly Mexican immigrants looking for work, 97% of whom don't commit any serious crimes and all of whom provide a net economic benefit in the aggregate.

The humanity!

Sales Tax - Services Rendered + Benefit to Employer - Detriment to Citizen (those who could of had that job) + Filling of unfilled/unfillable positions - % in Prison - Housing Inflation - Government Housing + Labor to construct housing

Still equals a net negative in most cases.

People who continue to say illegals take jobs away from Americans continue to ignore that the only jobs they're taking are unskilled labor jobs Americans don't take in significant numbers in the first place. Americans have the added benefit of being able to attain higher education, something illegals cannot, and so being unable to compete with the illegals taking low skilled jobs says something about those Americans, and it ain't pretty.

Besides, the amount illegals likely spend on sales tax alone drawfs anything they take in social services or gov't housing. Easily. State tax in CA is near 9.75% now or something. Multiply that by the 5M+ illegals and you get many billions, and many hundreds of millions or maybe billions more in savings from small businesses that hire illegals below minimum wages (which I don't condone, but it's a reality).

Not sure what you mean by housing inflation; illegals can't afford houses and the ones they can afford aren't causing anywhere near significant asset inflation. Additionally, price inflation, as in the assets themselves, is a good thing, that's the whole point of investing, to raise your ROI. If you invested in a house in CA in 1979 your return is anywhere from 5-6 times that value depending on where you bought. And that's despite the current housing meltdown.
 

rpanic

Golden Member
Dec 1, 2006
1,896
7
81
Originally posted by: Evan
Originally posted by: TruePaige
Originally posted by: Evan
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: Vic


So what you're saying is that the government IS the solution. Got it.

Don't try to trap me Vic. We're both smarter than that and I know you've read The Constitution. You're trying to group me with hardcore libertarians which I am not, and you most likely know that.

I don't think you're even remotely a libertarian, spidey.

And -- aside from an item prohibiting Congress from outlawing the importation of slaves until after 1808 -- there's absolutely nothing in the Constitution against or even about immigration. Quite the opposite, the Founding Fathers were counting on it with borders wide open.

Correct. As long as they became citizens. Nobody AFAIK has a problem with immigration and we all welcome it, it's the illegal part that they have a problem with.

But we have an invasion going on.

Yes, an invasion of mostly Mexican immigrants looking for work, 97% of whom don't commit any serious crimes and all of whom provide a net economic benefit in the aggregate.

The humanity!

Sales Tax - Services Rendered + Benefit to Employer - Detriment to Citizen (those who could of had that job) + Filling of unfilled/unfillable positions - % in Prison - Housing Inflation - Government Housing + Labor to construct housing

Still equals a net negative in most cases.

People who continue to say illegals take jobs away from Americans continue to ignore that the only jobs they're taking are unskilled labor jobs Americans don't take in significant numbers in the first place. Americans have the added benefit of being able to attain higher education, something illegals cannot, and so being unable to compete with the illegals taking low skilled jobs says something about those Americans, and it ain't pretty.

Go to states where there are not a lot of illegals. Those jobs are done by teenagers and retired.

Besides, the amount illegals likely spend on sales tax alone drawfs anything they take in social services or gov't housing. Easily. State tax in CA is near 9.75% now or something. Multiply that by the 5M+ illegals and you get many billions, and many hundreds of millions or maybe billions more in savings from small businesses that hire illegals below minimum wages (which I don't condone, but it's a reality).

Illegals do not make much and make a lot of there purchases private party, second hand, swap meets, food items are not taxable.


Not sure what you mean by housing inflation; illegals can't afford houses and the ones they can afford aren't causing anywhere near significant asset inflation. Additionally, price inflation, as in the assets themselves, is a good thing, that's the whole point of investing, to raise your ROI. If you invested in a house in CA in 1979 your return is anywhere from 5-6 times that value depending on where you bought. And that's despite the current housing meltdown.

They buy and rent houses and fill them up with multiple families, go into any Hispanic residential area the streets are crowded with cars. They impoverish areas making them undesirable, destroying schools, and causing housing to skyrocket in other areas.
 

xj0hnx

Diamond Member
Dec 18, 2007
9,262
3
76
Originally posted by: MovingTarget
Sigh...I took the bait. Don't feed the trollsgrumblegrumble... I should know better by now. C is for :cookie: and thats good enough for me.

Anyway, I hope Obama and the Dems can get through an immigration reform bill. It is about time. The system has been failing since the early Reagan era and even before. We need a path to citizenship for those who are willing to pay their dues. We need to make English proficiency part of the process (and include more ESL training for those in the process). The quota system needs to be revised as well. Too few slots are available to meet demand, and the process is too long and drawn out (beurocratically speaking). We also need to get tougher for those who refuse to abide by US immigration law. If enough slots are available and the process streamlined, I would have no sympathy for those who refuse to go through the process. We should treat them like Mexico treats its own illegal immigrants from south of their boarder (within our own constitutional protections, of course).

There already is a system in place, and it's NOT that hard to do, much easier to not do it since they don't want to be Americans anyway.
 

nobodyknows

Diamond Member
Sep 28, 2008
5,474
0
0
Originally posted by: blackangst1
Originally posted by: Evan
Funny to see the wingnuts still not seeing the hole they're digging themselves with immigration. One minute they're all for legal immigration, the next minute they're saying they don't want bills that would legalize illegals, perhaps because the word "amnesty" is attached, who the hell knows. When an immigration bill is passed in 2010, and if Repubs are strongly opposed to it, they'll be a permanent minority in Congress until they move left. Using terms like anchor babies also helps the left's cause. Like stealing candy from a baby.

As someone who is INTIMATELY familiar of how legal immigration works in this country...I would be all for a bill that gave amnestly...with TWO caveats: the prospective immigrants go through the same background checks that legal immigrants do, and that they are NOT given citizenship immediately, but rather a conditional green card, just like legal immigrants do.

We have a whole world full of people clamoring to get into this country. Why should the people of this country allow Mexicans to flow over our border in record numbers and then reward them with amnesty/citizenship?

We are keeping a much better class of people in line and waiting to immigrate here while we allow uneducated people who can't speak our language and in many cases don't even want to learn it.

This should be a no-brainer issue really. The problem is people like you are only concerned with having some cheap ass labor to do your dirty work.

 

exar333

Diamond Member
Feb 7, 2004
8,518
8
91
Maybe they can sneak the majority of the UHC bill (assuming it doesn't pass) into this and see if anyone notices?

Seriously though, this is the only large bill Obama has proposed that I agree with. I may not agree 100% with what it will have, but the discussion is NEEDED badly. We need to define a immigration policy and stick with it. The way we are going is obviously not working.
 

xj0hnx

Diamond Member
Dec 18, 2007
9,262
3
76
Originally posted by: ExarKun333
I may not agree 100% with what it will have, but the discussion is NEEDED badly. We need to define a immigration policy and stick with it. The way we are going is obviously not working.

The problem isn't that there's no discourse, the problem is that there already are laws, and process that are being ignored by both illegals, and the government. There is already a system in place for immigrants to become legal citizens, or resident aliens, and get work visas.