• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

President Biden?

boomerang

boomerang

Lifer
Could be another historic first because I had no clue that Biden swung both ways. In Iowa he did a shout out to one of his "old butt buddies". I'm hoping Neil Smith was already out or things could be awkward for him.

http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/biden-gives-shout-out-old-butt-buddy-iowa_849717.html

Maybe his face lift turned out a little too tight and it's effecting his judgement. j/k, he's always engaged his mouth before thinking.

Speaking of face lifts, when will Hillary reappear with hers? How long does it take for the bruising to subside?
 
President Biden would be amusing, but he'd probably be a pretty bad President. He might even be as bad as having another Republican President. But I'm not sure if even HE could be as bad as a Republican.
 
electoral politics is redundant. not just in the USA, but globally...

we need a new system...because every president promises x, delivers y, is detested and the same thing happens every election. and always has, even "wise" people like Jefferson made a shitload of mistakes...
 
Wouldn't it be funny if an actually honest candidate came around that actually told the truth to the people and said exactly what he would be able to deliver (almost zero) in the current economical climate? While simultaneously refraining from using Superpacs and attack ads and evasiveness and sucking up to koch bothers all kinds of things voters detest?

lol, He'd be unelectable.
 
Biden is listed as a 33/1 proposition. If I were to go long on a future President longshot bet I'd probably rather try someone like Mark Warner at 66/1 or Susana Martinez at 50/1. I'd also probably fade O'Malley after saying a while back that Obama's economy wasn't better than Bush's.
 
Sonikku said:
Wouldn't it be funny if an actually honest candidate came around that actually told the truth to the people and said exactly what he would be able to deliver (almost zero) in the current economical climate? While simultaneously refraining from using Superpacs and attack ads and evasiveness and sucking up to koch bothers all kinds of things voters detest?

lol, He'd be unelectable.
Click to expand...
I was with you until you mentioned the Koch brothers. It's just petty and shows your bias. I'd like to see a candidate that stood up before the people and said I will vote whatever way the majority of you want me to vote regardless of whether I feel you are right or you are wrong. I will be there to abide by your wishes. Obviously I'm not talking about the President. His role should be returned to the original intent which is solely to enforce the law.
 
senseamp said:
He'd be a good one. Better than a Koch picked candidate. 30 more years of trickle down, no thanks.
Click to expand...
Obama has made huge strides in the area of wealth inequity in favor of his "constituents" and they'll most likely see continued "progress" if another Democrat is elected to the WH.

20140806_obamainequality.jpg
 
Last edited:
Doc Savage Fan said:
Obama has made huge strides in the area of wealth inequity for his constituents and we'll most likely see continued "progress" if another Democrat is elected to the WH.
Click to expand...

Are you saying that if we enacted the Republican platform things would be better for income inequality? If so, please explain.
 
Sonikku said:
Holy Crap. What the hell happened in the 80's?
Click to expand...
Reagan. Trickle-down economics. Make the top much wealthier and then the poor will be wealthier, um, somehow, because he said so.

We did the make the wealthy wealthier part. We are just waiting for the trickle down part. It'll come any day now.

Any day.
 
First said:
I suppose pretending Repubs didn't control all three branches of government for most of the naughts wasn't proof enough that their party has inferior solutions to Dems/liberals, eh?
Click to expand...
Democrats have had substantial control the past 6 years and we can clearly see the fruits of their labors. I was hoping for change we can believe in. How about you?
 
dullard said:
Reagan. Trickle-down economics. Make the top much wealthier and then the poor will be wealthier, um, somehow, because he said so.

We did the make the wealthy wealthier part. We are just waiting for the trickle down part. It'll come any day now.

Any day.
Click to expand...


I see the Ministry of Plenty has taught you well. We've always been at war with Eastasia.

voted-for-kodos.png
 
Doc Savage Fan said:
Democrats have had substantial control the past 6 years and we can clearly see the fruits of their labors. I was hoping for change we can believe in. How about you?
Click to expand...

Yeah, the economy is recovering nicely, the stock market is at record highs, troops are coming home from foreign wars.
If Republicans couldn't beat Obama in the depths of recession, they will have no chance against Hillary in a recovering economy.
 
Doc Savage Fan said:
Democrats have had substantial control the past 6 years and we can clearly see the fruits of their labors. I was hoping for change we can believe in. How about you?
Click to expand...

The fruits of their labors in the last 6 years are absolutely excellent historically, of that there is little doubt post Sept-2008 financial crisis. Not only has the private sector job growth been vastly superior between 09-14 compared to the 8 yrs under GWB , but getting deficits under control, stabilizing income gains and of course tens of millions with health insurance.

EDIT: By comparison, what was accomplished under GWB with Republican Congress 01-06? Patriot Act and tax cuts? Iraq?
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top