Prescotts?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

coolego1

Member
Jun 29, 2004
70
0
0
I think I've decided that the Prescotts aren't as bad as they were. I had one final question though: Shimmishim mentioned D0 and E0 stepping. What's the difference there? I know I'm at least getting a D0 stepping, but is the E0 better? By the way, I'm looking at a 3.4 Prescott.
 

garkon8

Member
Oct 5, 2004
77
0
66
Originally posted by: coolego1
I think I've decided that the Prescotts aren't as bad as they were. I had one final question though: Shimmishim mentioned D0 and E0 stepping. What's the difference there? I know I'm at least getting a D0 stepping, but is the E0 better? By the way, I'm looking at a 3.4 Prescott.


This might help Intel Spec Finder
Good luck, and be happy with any decision you make.
 

imported_SLIM

Member
Jun 14, 2004
176
0
0
Gees ppl he said NO overclocking. The latest comparison between precott and Athlon 64 is here. The platform descriptions are on page 3, the video editing/encoding benchmarks are on pp 7,8 and the gaming benchmarks start on p 9. The A/V editing/encoding is very dependent on the software you are using (adobe premiere seems to be A64 while autogk goes to prescott).

The only northwood comparison I could find was way back when prescott was launchedhere. Basically at the same clock and with same chipset prescott was very similar in performance to the northwoods but runs hotter.

Price to performance wise, I think you'd be ok with a 3500 athlon 64 (the dual channel memory will actually be helpful for your intended uses). The ddr2 memory really jacks the price of a prescott system up, and the 3.4g northwood is so rare now that its price is disproportionately high.
 

stardust

Golden Member
May 17, 2003
1,282
0
0
Wait for the E0 core.. you'll start to see the best of the prescott with that. Then again I have both A64 and E0 Prescott..and I would prefer the AMD system at stock. I bought the P4 for overclocking purposes only.
 

bim27142

Senior member
Oct 6, 2004
213
0
0
Originally posted by: Marlin1975
Originally posted by: bim27142
Originally posted by: coolego1
I'm not overclocking, as I've said, so stock, what's the deal on prescott vs. northwood vs. A64?

i'm running stock with my 2.4 prescott, temps stay below 50 idle typically 45~48... intensive apps, gaming and media encoding for several hours, just below 60(never hitted more than 60 yet)... i think that's not hot enough IMO...


Well DUH!! You are only at 2.4Ghz. Try doing all that at 3Ghz and come back.

yeah i know, so i think prescotts are just fine thermally at lower speeds...but when it hits 3Ghz++, then thermal issues come in...
 

bim27142

Senior member
Oct 6, 2004
213
0
0
Originally posted by: LTC8K6
but when it hits 3Ghz++, then thermal issues come in...

If that were true, then the good overclocks on air would not be happening.
well i don't really know for sure because i'm not overclocking... but that's what people say, prescotts are hot... but runnning stock would be pretty fine and intel designed thermal solution can handle it pretty well...
 

coolego1

Member
Jun 29, 2004
70
0
0
I figure generally that if Intel designed the cooling solution, they probably got it to work, therefore I should be able to get it to work... I will have one large case fan at the back. I'm re-using an old Dell Dimension XPS Pentium 2 something-or-other case for this build since I'm cheap, but I'm getting a new PSU. I'm a little concerned about heat, but I hope it won't be a problem...
 

AristoV300

Golden Member
May 29, 2004
1,380
0
0
If you are running stock speeds the Northwoods are better performers. Prescotts are great overclockers.
 

KDKPSJ

Diamond Member
Dec 13, 2002
3,288
58
91
Don't believe too much those people who say Prescott is too hot. Most of people who are against Prescotts are A64 or Northwood users. (Because, IMO, there are not many reasonable reasons to switch from A64 or Northwood to Prescott unless you really want to try it out) Many of them only repeat what the others say. Yes, it runs hotter than Northwood/A64, but still cooler than old goody Thunderbird :p.
 

bim27142

Senior member
Oct 6, 2004
213
0
0
Originally posted by: everydae
Don't believe too much those people who say Prescott is too hot. Most of people who are against Prescotts are A64 or Northwood users. (Because, IMO, there are not many reasonable reasons to switch from A64 or Northwood to Prescott unless you really want to try it out) Many of them only repeat what the others say. Yes, it runs hotter than Northwood/A64, but still cooler than old goody Thunderbird :p.

what's thunderbird? anyway, reasons why i bougth prescott:

1. before, i thought P4 2.4 are all the same (im a newbie in the PC world... )
2. it's the only one readily available here in my place
3. it's cheaper than northwoods... :)
 

AristoV300

Golden Member
May 29, 2004
1,380
0
0
Originally posted by: bim27142
Originally posted by: everydae
Don't believe too much those people who say Prescott is too hot. Most of people who are against Prescotts are A64 or Northwood users. (Because, IMO, there are not many reasonable reasons to switch from A64 or Northwood to Prescott unless you really want to try it out) Many of them only repeat what the others say. Yes, it runs hotter than Northwood/A64, but still cooler than old goody Thunderbird :p.

what's thunderbird? anyway, reasons why i bougth prescott:

1. before, i thought P4 2.4 are all the same (im a newbie in the PC world... )
2. it's the only one readily available here in my place
3. it's cheaper than northwoods... :)

and no HyperThreading...
 

Vette73

Lifer
Jul 5, 2000
21,503
9
0
Originally posted by: everydae
Don't believe too much those people who say Prescott is too hot. Most of people who are against Prescotts are A64 or Northwood users. (Because, IMO, there are not many reasonable reasons to switch from A64 or Northwood to Prescott unless you really want to try it out) Many of them only repeat what the others say. Yes, it runs hotter than Northwood/A64, but still cooler than old goody Thunderbird :p.



Ahhhh... No its not. The prescotts have over a 100watt power useage. Look at any review, or build several systems, like myself, that have used both.

Oh and since everybody that does not agree is a fanyboy....
<-- Running DUAL Xeons
 

LTC8K6

Lifer
Mar 10, 2004
28,520
1,576
126
Now, I haven't actually checked but Prescott could have higher power usage and still run cooler than a T-bird due to core size differences. Power usage alone doesn't necessarily indicate how hot a processor will be or how hard it will be to cool.

Theoretically, you could have a 150 watt processor that's easier to cool than a 100 watt processor if the 150 watt chip is a larger core size.
 

jose

Platinum Member
Oct 11, 1999
2,079
2
81
Which is the best for socket 478 ? C0, DO, EO steppings

What was special about the CO steppings ??

Regards,
Jose