Prediction: 7.0 or above Earthquake between Japan and California

[Cuda1447]

I am predicting a 7.0 EQ between Japan and California within the next week. My predictions are based on science. If I had to be more specific, I would predict the earthquake off the coast of California. My predictions will prove to be true.

 

[busydude]

In before dmcowen.

 

[Red Squirrel]

I'm thinking it will be more like a 7.4, I've come to a similar calculation according to my simulation program. (Sim City 2000)

 

[BoomerD]

Missed it by --> <-- that much...

http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsus/Quakes/usc0004f5m.php

NOT off the coast of California nor Japan...but it WAS over 7.0...it just happened 2 days ago.

 

[BudAshes]

Im predicting a 10.0 in california right no..... aaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

 

[SparkyJJO]

In before dmcowen.

:thumbsup:

 

[Pray To Jesus]

"It's not a prediction. It's a declaration."

 

[EagleKeeper]

I am predicting a 7.0 EQ between Japan and California within the next week. My predictions are based on science. If I had to be more specific, I would predict the earthquake off the coast of California. My predictions will prove to be true.

If this does not happen, you may not make lifer for a while.

It could be considered to be a callout or troll thread - both are able to result in lost of posting privileges.

 

[Lemon law]

A 10.0 quake is simply not very likely off California, the rocks there simply are not that strong. And hence will break well before that much stress is built up.

Other than that, earth quake prediction is far from an exact science. Ten or so years ago the Japanese thought they knew a thing or two, but since then they have found out how very little they knew.

But I am just an amateur so I will not pretend to make valid predictions, even if I am interested in the subject.

 

[Nebor]

A 10.0 quake is simply not very likely off California, the rocks there simply are not that strong. And hence will break well before that much stress is built up.

Other than that, earth quake prediction is far from an exact science. Ten or so years ago the Japanese thought they knew a thing or two, but since then they have found out how very little they knew.

But I am just an amateur so I will not pretend to make valid predictions, even if I am interested in the subject.

Yeah, Earthquakes are unpredictable, but Israeli\Palestinian relations, you've got those on lock. :awe:

 

[Cuda1447]

Missed it by --> <-- that much...

http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsus/Quakes/usc0004f5m.php

NOT off the coast of California nor Japan...but it WAS over 7.0...it just happened 2 days ago.

I was aware of that quake and it aided in my prediction of the future quake, which I think will be closer to California.

 

[Cuda1447]

If this does not happen, you may not make lifer for a while.

It could be considered to be a callout or troll thread - both are able to result in lost of posting privileges.

I've waited 9 years to make lifer, whats another few weeks?

And in all seriousness, this isn't meant as a troll or callout thread. I really am predicting this and I want it to be on record.

 

[Muse]

I'm thinking it will be more like a 7.4, I've come to a similar calculation according to my simulation program. (Sim City 2000)

No, no no! 7.19.

 

[Muse]

A 10.0 quake is simply not very likely off California, the rocks there simply are not that strong. And hence will break well before that much stress is built up.

Other than that, earth quake prediction is far from an exact science. Ten or so years ago the Japanese thought they knew a thing or two, but since then they have found out how very little they knew.

But I am just an amateur so I will not pretend to make valid predictions, even if I am interested in the subject.

AFAIK, a 10.0 has never happened on planet earth, at least in the last 10,000 years.

 

[Ichinisan]

I think this parody of dmcowen has already been done.

 

[Cuda1447]

I think this parody of dmcowen has already been done.

It's not a parodymotherfucker

 

[JTsyo]

I'm thinking it will be more like a 7.4, I've come to a similar calculation according to my simulation program. (Sim City 2000)

:awe:

 

[Ichinisan]

It's not a parodymotherfucker

Who would SERIOUSLY try this after seeing the backlash that dmcowen gets for doing this same thing?


I still say you're foolin'.

 

[shady28]

This isn't original, seems this is a high probability time from multiple sites:

http://mobile.twitter.com/quakeprediction

http://www.quakeprediction.com/GraphCalifornia.html

Would have been more interesting if the OP had just posted his sources.

 

[KaOTiK]

I'm thinking it will be more like a 7.4, I've come to a similar calculation according to my simulation program. (Sim City 2000)

If you would have updated your prediction software (SimCity 4000) you would know it is estimated to be a 7.2

 

[illusion88]

I'm thinking between the north and south pole there will be an eathquake within the next ten minutes. MARK

 

[IGBT]

wat? earthquakes on the ring of fire?? how profound!

 

[Cuda1447]

This isn't original, seems this is a high probability time from multiple sites:

http://mobile.twitter.com/quakeprediction

http://www.quakeprediction.com/GraphCalifornia.html

Would have been more interesting if the OP had just posted his sources.

Hadn't seen those sources. I came upon this conclusion with a real life conversation with a friend who knows a bit about this stuff. I could post his name for you, if you'd like.

 

[IceBergSLiM]

I predict my banana phone will ring within the next 32 minutes.