- Dec 29, 2005
- 6,262
- 2,238
- 136
I've finally got around to test the impact of intel turbo boost on PPD and PPD/watt on my dial socket Ivy bridge machine.
Hardware:
Dual socket motherboard
2x E5-2690 V2 (Ivy Bridge)
TDP for each processor =130W
Total of 40 logical cores
Turbo boost disabled: All cores at 3 GHz
Turbo boost enabled: All cores at 3.3 GHz
GTX980 (idle)
Application:
TN-Grid AVX on all 40 threads (full load)
Power draw from the wall:
Turbo boost on: 390 watts
Turbo boost off: 310 watts
PPD (calculated from 20 completed tasks):
Turbo boost on: 30136
Turbo boost off: 28455
PPD/watt:
Turbo boost on: 77.27
Turbo boost off: 91.74
So with turbo boost on I see a 10% increase in all core clock speed, 25.8% increase in power draw, 5.9% increase in PPD and 15.8% decrease in PPD/watt.
I guess the logical thing for me to do is disable turbo boost in the bios except maybe in races.
I was a bit shell-shocked to see this machine drawing nearly 400 watts from the wall. I suspect a non-avx app would draw significantly less power though.
Hardware:
Dual socket motherboard
2x E5-2690 V2 (Ivy Bridge)
TDP for each processor =130W
Total of 40 logical cores
Turbo boost disabled: All cores at 3 GHz
Turbo boost enabled: All cores at 3.3 GHz
GTX980 (idle)
Application:
TN-Grid AVX on all 40 threads (full load)
Power draw from the wall:
Turbo boost on: 390 watts
Turbo boost off: 310 watts
PPD (calculated from 20 completed tasks):
Turbo boost on: 30136
Turbo boost off: 28455
PPD/watt:
Turbo boost on: 77.27
Turbo boost off: 91.74
So with turbo boost on I see a 10% increase in all core clock speed, 25.8% increase in power draw, 5.9% increase in PPD and 15.8% decrease in PPD/watt.
I guess the logical thing for me to do is disable turbo boost in the bios except maybe in races.
I was a bit shell-shocked to see this machine drawing nearly 400 watts from the wall. I suspect a non-avx app would draw significantly less power though.