sandorski
No Lifer
if you work in a zero tolerance safety sensitive environment..your fired. Now go home and explain to your family why they no longer have a income.
If you work in a Zero Tolerance spelling environment, you're Fired!
if you work in a zero tolerance safety sensitive environment..your fired. Now go home and explain to your family why they no longer have a income.
if you work in a zero tolerance safety sensitive environment..your fired. Now go home and explain to your family why they no longer have a income.
If you work in a Zero Tolerance spelling environment, you're Fired!
i drive better when high. its been proven over a decade where the only near-accidents ive been in have always been while i was sober (usually trying to read political signs, or looking at scenery). when im high im happy just keeping my eyes on the road.
... Moreover, there are several legal over-the-counter medications or chemicals which certainly alter a person's state of mind from one of strict sobriety but for which there are no prohibitions from driving while under their influence.
You are a pathetic person. 🙄dago dopers.
Yeah I can imagine it's a lot, but if you look at how many people manage to text while driving and die vs the number of drugees that get in a car and die... :hmm:
dago dopers.
If you want to do the research I'm happy to hear it.
Man, I thought the NZ guy hitting three motorcycles (with his grandkids) while drunk was bad, this one ups it.
care to back up your own ridiculousness?
or just spout inane BS on a constant basis?
you and IGBT would get along beautifully.
Anyone see this comment?
"To: Dallas59
Another terrible trageday. It is time for bicycles to banned from the roads."
*facepalm*
I don't think that guessing morons who take drugs kill more people than texters is "insane BS"...
actually, it is.
you aren't taking into account the resources needed to actually drive and operate a vehicle in public, and how the hierarchy of such resources are compromised in your two subject pools.
think about this: vision + concentration.
--texters: use neither of these very, very important resources while texting+driving.
--someone who is high: use both resources 100% of the time (though for the second--concentration--not to the greatest effect, obviously)
actually, there have been a few studies showing how MJ does have less detrimental effect on driving than does alcohol.
there's even more studies showing how cell phone use (hand-free or not--they are identically bad, actually), are much worse than driving drunk. Also, texting is, by far, the most dangerous form of distracted driving.
it really doesn't take much of a mind to simply think about and compare these two, and realize the issue.
You seem to not be concerned with such thoughts. just general ignorance, I guess. :\
I guess I just haven't spent any time with drugs in my system and you have...
I don't think that guessing morons who take drugs kill more people than texters is "insane BS"...
I guess I just haven't spent any time with drugs in my system and you have...
YOU'VE NEVER DRIVEN ON
alcohol, tobacco, caffeine, day-quil, sudafed, claritin, etc, etc, etc?
Twenty-eight percent of traffic accidents occur when people talk on cellphones or send text messages while driving, according to a study released Tuesday by the National Safety Council.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/12/AR2010011202218.html
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Societ...distracted-driving-deaths-to-rise-study-finds
your turn.