• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Post your RC5/OGR benchmarks here from the 8010.463b clients

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Ken-

Interesting, that's a 2% improvement by forcing it to use the Athlon core. I'll try that on the 6x86 in my herd when I get the chance.

viz
 
PIII-650:
3 RC5 short benchmarks:
0.00:00:08.39 [1,748,680.88 keys/sec]
0.00:00:08.22 [1,784,606.85 keys/sec]
0.00:00:08.29 [1,768,909.02 keys/sec]
=====================================
average:
0.00:00:08.30 [1,767,398.92 keys/sec]

The results were a little slower then average since I was virus scanning at the time. The results under computer near-idle conditions (only small, mostly idle apps running) are closer to 1.8 million keys/sec (avg: 1,800,993.25)
 
K7 1000@1100 (FSB 110) (No GFD)
8,551,962.01 nodes/sec - OGR Long
3,886,763.45 keys/sec - RC5 Long

 
OK, this is a repeat sort of, but I've changed the speed of my Celeron to 920 and ran the benchmarks so I thought I may as well post them.

[Aug 06 22:04:58 UTC] Benchmark for RC5 core #2 (RG class 6)
0.00:00:16.39 [2,622,419.42 keys/sec]
[Aug 06 22:05:17 UTC] Benchmark for OGR core #0 (GARSP 5.13)
0.00:00:16.08 [6,354,923.94 nodes/sec]
[Aug 06 22:05:45 UTC] Benchmark for RC5 core #2 (RG class 6)
0.00:00:16.39 [2,622,739.38 keys/sec]
[Aug 06 22:06:05 UTC] Benchmark for OGR core #0 (GARSP 5.13)
0.00:00:16.06 [6,359,669.67 nodes/sec]
[Aug 06 22:06:30 UTC] Benchmark for RC5 core #2 (RG class 6)
0.00:00:16.40 [2,621,140.34 keys/sec]
[Aug 06 22:06:49 UTC] Benchmark for OGR core #0 (GARSP 5.13)
0.00:00:16.09 [6,349,790.72 nodes/sec]

So that's still 6,354,794.78 nodes/sec and 6,907.39 nodes/sec/MHz in OGR.
And, that's 2,622,099.71 keys/sec and 2,850.11 keys/sec/MHz in RC5.

By the way, OGR-25 should be the same speed for processing right? ie. a node is the same size right? The reason I ask is with the humungous sizes of these work units I have no real idea how fast my computer is working.
 
RC5/OGR Stats for a PII-400@448 - 112MHz FSB, 192MB CAS-2 SDRAM
8010.463B client

OGR Speed (Long):
2,992,083.06 nodes/sec
2,988,581.60
2,993,559.81

Average 2,991,408.15667

RC5 Speed (Long):
1,246,829.96 keys/sec
1,248,165.69
1,247,497.47

Average 1,247,497.70667
 
Duron 650@772 FSB 103 MHz 128 MB SRAM
8010.463B client

[Aug 07 17:55:29 UTC] RC5: using core #6 (RG/HB ath).
[Aug 07 17:55:50 UTC] Benchmark for RC5 core #6 (RG/HB ath)
0.00:00:16.10 [2,734,900.58 keys/sec]
[Aug 07 17:56:09 UTC] Benchmark for OGR core #0 (GARSP 5.13)
0.00:00:16.15 [6,131,060.93 nodes/sec]

[Aug 07 17:56:24 UTC] RC5: using core #6 (RG/HB ath).
[Aug 07 17:56:43 UTC] Benchmark for RC5 core #6 (RG/HB ath)
0.00:00:16.36 [2,755,463.64 keys/sec]
[Aug 07 17:57:02 UTC] Benchmark for OGR core #0 (GARSP 5.13)
0.00:00:16.16 [6,193,628.06 nodes/sec]

[Aug 07 17:57:15 UTC] RC5: using core #6 (RG/HB ath).
[Aug 07 17:57:34 UTC] Benchmark for RC5 core #6 (RG/HB ath)
0.00:00:16.00 [2,752,015.10 keys/sec]
[Aug 07 17:57:53 UTC] Benchmark for OGR core #0 (GARSP 5.13)
0.00:00:16.16 [6,193,627.67 nodes/sec]

Running on Win2K Pro - But it sure could need more ram :<

 
ccalvert-

I just ordered two of the 166MMX ODPs from computergeeks for $20 each.
It looks like a good upgrade for doing RC5, but not OGR or Gamma flux.

viz
 
Back
Top