Post your Fritz Chess Benchmark Results

[Crono]

 

[jihe]

Yeah, I too do not get the "embarrassing" quip given that regardless the time frame involved (be it 6 months or 6 years) the fact is AMD is the second and only other company to produce a product that is capable of performing at that level.

This whole notion that a product is worthless, or the company and its employees are rubbish, if it (they) come in second place on the basis of arbitrary metrics (be it years until reaching performance parity, or power consumption, or performance per core, or performance per clock, or performance per dollar, etc) is really quite a needless stance to take on the debate.

Show me the results from the third runner-up, and then we can debate the relevance of the second-place holder. If all you got is a first and second place then it is time to simply be thankful that there is a even second-place contender in the first place.

Forget intel, it's really about AMD getting their new 8 cores to perform better than their own previous gen 6 cores. It's as much an embarrassment as the pentium 4 when it was getting handily outperformed by the pentium 3's and celerons.

 

[MongGrel]

 

[jihe]

I'm pretty sure you're throttling. 12 threads@4Ghz already get over 20k.

 

[YBS1]

He's not likely throttling. My guess is his 22x turbo multiplier isn't "locked in" though, he's scoring like he's getting 20x (His top non turbo multiplier) under a full 6 core load rather than the displayed 22x. Assuming that's true his score is exactly where it should be.

 

[mrmt]

Yeah, I too do not get the "embarrassing" quip given that regardless the time frame involved (be it 6 months or 6 years) the fact is AMD is the second and only other company to produce a product that is capable of performing at that level.

I don't think there's anything embarrassing in the time frame, but in the sheer amount of resources involved versus the results achieved. Bulldozer and its derivatives tied up the company's R&D for about 10 years and all they got was... that. From this POV, yes, it's embarrassing.

But I think we shouldn't beat this dead horse anymore, there's no better testament of this than AMD decision to start from the scratch with their new x86 arch.

 

[Abwx]

Seems that people didnt check Fritz affinity in respect of uarchitectures.

A Haswell core witout HT has barely 10% higher IPC than a core 2 quad,
IPC progress between Nehalem and Haswell is about negligible in Fritz but nevermind for some people who are uninformed and think that big progress were made in this soft by recent uarchs, heck, they are too busy beating said horses without even checking the numbers.

 

[wilds]

i5-4690k @ 4.55 Ghz

Could we post 1 thread/core results as well? I think it would be interesting, especially when comparing against older architectures and upcoming ones such as Broadwell.

1 Core:

4 Cores:

 

[TurtleCrusher]

Performance on 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8 cores. Scores went up slightly as I had nothing else open during the tests besides my browser and paint.

Going from 4 cores to 8 cores netted a 36% increase in performance. Going from 4 to 6 was a 27% increase, and going from 6 to 8 was only a 12.7% increase in performance,

 

[MongGrel]

He's not likely throttling. My guess is his 22x turbo multiplier isn't "locked in" though, he's scoring like he's getting 20x (His top non turbo multiplier) under a full 6 core load rather than the displayed 22x. Assuming that's true his score is exactly where it should be.

This.

And nice pick up on that.

Is just my everyday thing, I could do others.

 

[Abwx]

I was off by 16% in my previous post, a Haswell Celeron has 11.6% higher
single thread IPC than a core 2 duo/quad in Fritzchess....

http://www.hardware.fr/articles/921-7/vs-core-2-duo-e6600-core-2-quad-q6600.html

 

[drhamed]

intel core i7 3930k @ 4.1
fantastic!

 

[ninaholic37]

Link is dead for me, so I tried Fritz 12 here.

Pentium M 735 @600Mhz... almost as fast as a P3. :thumbsup:

 

[bugmenot]

Intel Atom Z3735F

 

[Makaveli]

Link is dead for me, so I tried Fritz 12 here.

Pentium M 735 @600Mhz... almost as fast as a P3. :thumbsup:

Using a completely different version invalids your results with the rest of the thread just a heads up.