Post your 3dmark2000 score!

[mwmorph]

Originally posted by: Ronin
If you're referring to me, I haven't done runs at 3GHz yet.

32mb texture rendering: not enough memory.
wtf? you'd think a gtx would have enough memory.

 

[Ronin]

Yeah, dunno what was up with that...apparently it didn't affect the score, though *shrugs*.

 

[ArchAngel777]

i think its more of his cpu is at 3 ghz

Hey there little fella, I think you need to get out your calculater before you spit out out a one line comment that isn't even accurate. His machine was at 2.8Ghz, and last I checked, 2.53 to 2.8 Ghz isn't going to give you a 30% + performance improvement. So, we need to look elsewhere, what could be the reason? Ahhh, perhaps the cache? Being that he has double mine 😀. Yes, the game loves cache, that much is obvious.

Keep in mind 2.53 to 2.8 is clocked 11% faster. His score is more than 30% faster... The only loss of performance could be in my RAM, being that they are 2-3-2-7-1T which would translate into about .66% slower, negligable. The only main difference I see with his and the other guys is that they both have 1MB cache, where I only have 512K.

 

[bjc112]

26552

Sig!

 

[T9D]

Wont open on mine either. Was wondering why. Guess it's because I have a 3.4 hyper thread P4.

 

[Avalon]

Got 18900 with a Venice @ 2.42ghz and a Geforce 6200 w/4x AF forced in the drivers (forgot I had them off when I ran the test).

Woot.

😛

 

[imported_g33k]

In this system 16895. Pretty obvious this benchmark is BIGTIME cpu limited. Judging from others scores, the video card doesnt matter as much.

 

[fibes]

834 on an eMachine 900Mhz system.

 

[imported_g33k]

That's pretty low, even for an outdated system like that one.