Originally posted by: n7
Originally posted by: BoberFett
Originally posted by: n7
DVD Rebuilder is far better than transcoders like DVD Shrink, etc.
Even when using the free HC encoder that DVD Rebuilder comes with, it's miles ahead of DVD Shrink, etc.
Out of curiosity, what makes you say that? I've been researching everything I can find in regards to DVD ripping so I can get my whole movie collection on a server which I can access through XBMC.
Is it the quality? The size? I'd love to just do straight rips without transcoding for max quality, but for my DVD collection I'd need at least a terabyte of disk space.
A couple reasons.
First one is personal experience.
I have re-encoded/transcoded hundreds of DVD9s to DVD5, & simply put, for anything lower than around ~ 75% compression, DVD Shrink is utter crap.
Granted, i have high standards, but why settle for crap quality with horrifying pixelation/artifacting when you can use something like DVD-RB + CCE & re-encode to around 50% compression with almost no noticeable quality loss?
Also, if you pay even a little attention to the DVD9 to DVD5 conversion scene, you'll always find that the "standard" for high quality compression is always DVD-RB + CCE (or one of its other compatible encoders).
There's a good reason why "release groups" use DVD-RB + CCE.
That's the best way you can do it. No question about it.
Oh, & as for your situation, if you can rip them w/o compression & not need to worry about space, go for it.
But rest asurred, if you needed to compress them all down to < 5 GB size, DVD-RB + CCE would leave you very happy with the resulting quality.
Originally posted by: Need4Speed
if you had such high standards then you'd be doing a 1:1 rip without transcoding.
Originally posted by: n7
Originally posted by: Need4Speed
if you had such high standards then you'd be doing a 1:1 rip without transcoding.
Fine then. :roll:
Let me clarify.
I like the best possible quality w/o buying damn overpriced issue-filled dual layer DVD-/+Rs.
Originally posted by: n7
Originally posted by: Need4Speed
if you had such high standards then you'd be doing a 1:1 rip without transcoding.
Fine then. :roll:
Let me clarify.
I like the best possible quality w/o buying damn overpriced issue-filled dual layer DVD-/+Rs.
Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire
Originally posted by: n7
Originally posted by: Need4Speed
if you had such high standards then you'd be doing a 1:1 rip without transcoding.
Fine then. :roll:
Let me clarify.
I like the best possible quality w/o buying damn overpriced issue-filled dual layer DVD-/+Rs.
So you're ripping the untouched VOBs directly to a network server?
- M4H
Probably because the odds of reading them on any random DVD player aren't even close to 100%.Originally posted by: ShellGuy
how is a dl dvd issue filled?
Originally posted by: Need4Speed
Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire
Originally posted by: n7
Originally posted by: Need4Speed
if you had such high standards then you'd be doing a 1:1 rip without transcoding.
Fine then. :roll:
Let me clarify.
I like the best possible quality w/o buying damn overpriced issue-filled dual layer DVD-/+Rs.
So you're ripping the untouched VOBs directly to a network server?
- M4H
thats what I do..then I stream them to my 360. If I like the movie then I will burn it to a DL disk and archive it.
Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire
Originally posted by: Need4Speed
Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire
Originally posted by: n7
Originally posted by: Need4Speed
if you had such high standards then you'd be doing a 1:1 rip without transcoding.
Fine then. :roll:
Let me clarify.
I like the best possible quality w/o buying damn overpriced issue-filled dual layer DVD-/+Rs.
So you're ripping the untouched VOBs directly to a network server?
- M4H
thats what I do..then I stream them to my 360. If I like the movie then I will burn it to a DL disk and archive it.
Funny, I just use my original media as the archive.
Arr?
- M4H
