lotus503
Diamond Member
- Feb 12, 2005
- 6,502
- 1
- 76
It's funny how these things work. If they're censoring 'our' internet, it's big government tyranny.
But when they convince people there's an enemy to be censored, so they're censoring 'those' perverts or left-wing radicals or terrorists or whatever, go for it!
That's how so many issues work - take the Trayvon story, when he's a 'kid we can relate to' it's a scandal, when he's a 'young punk black thug', people make excuses.
It's how it's worked a long time - McCarthyism was accepted when it was 'protecting us from the enemy communists', and rejected when it was about 'our freedoms'.
Welfare - people were 'Americans' when it passed, remembering the Great Depression and a 'war on poverty' was an 'American priority'.
Then it turned to 'those' blacks and minorities - screw that!
Civil rights - same thing, when whites were initially so against 'those people' changing things, until it became 'our rights as Americans'.
That's why campaign marketing has been so much about making the people feel alienated about the 'enemy candidate'.
With John Kerry it was painting him as feminine and French, with Obama it's Muslim, foreign, raised in a Madrassa, pals with terrorists, radical. Not one of us!
The left has had great success when it's painted a candidate as too 'aloof' - with Bush 41, with Romney. It's why Bush 43 made such a point of 'Nook ya lur'. He's no elitist!
This is how rights get stripped. They'll find one or a few examples of the internet content most offensive to people and use that to build support for 'doing something'.
You are so spot on!!