Originally posted by: TehMac
I think what irritates me is that everyone is jumping on this game, and its only a rumor, they haven't played it, and yet you people compare to bash it. Why don't you read my post? I pointed out that EA made a game that was acclaimed on both PCs and Consoles simultaneously.
And I don't know if the UE3 would be so great for rendering huge maps with 80 players. That said, 80 players isn't much of an improvement over 64.
I'm hoping Frontlines Fuel of War is competitive, so that EA has more competition, other than their own games.
I think its completely fair. we've had several iterations of the game so far and they've all pretty much sucked ass and were just clones of each other. now other companies are making games with the same shitty gameplay and style (crysis, frontlines, ET:QW, etc).
I'm tired of the BF clones because they all suck.
when i first heard about BF2, it sounded awesome. huge map, lots of people, vehicles, etc.
when i played it, it doesn't work. takes too long to get anywhere, eevryone steals the vehicles and don't allow you to even hitch a ride, people look like ants, so you can't see them until they're on top of you, and by then, you're halfway dead.