Possible beginning of another Holocaust?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Meuge

Banned
Nov 27, 2005
2,963
0
0
Originally posted by: RichardE
Originally posted by: Trente
Originally posted by: RichardE
meh, who cares. Let Iran deal with its own problems

I'm sickened by some of the responses of you people. sickened, but not surprised.

Why? So we can invade Iran to stop this? To protect 25000 people how many would it costs? Since when is the West the babysitter or the Middle East/Asia
And how many is OK?

You know, to protect 10 million people, how many would it cost? Well, it cost a whole lot more than that actually.

So tell me - how many people is ENOUGH for your highness? How many dead from genocide is OK?
 

RichardE

Banned
Dec 31, 2005
10,246
2
0
Originally posted by: Meuge
Originally posted by: RichardE
Originally posted by: Trente
Originally posted by: RichardE
meh, who cares. Let Iran deal with its own problems

I'm sickened by some of the responses of you people. sickened, but not surprised.

Why? So we can invade Iran to stop this? To protect 25000 people how many would it costs? Since when is the West the babysitter or the Middle East/Asia
And how many is OK?

You know, to protect 10 million people, how many would it cost? Well, it cost a whole lot more than that actually.

So tell me - how many people is ENOUGH for your highness? How many dead from genocide is OK?

So you agree with the Iraq war?

Pick a reason, WMD (appeal to the masses)

How about the backup ones, Killing all the kurds, (genocide) killing his own people, so I guess that justifies Iraq invasion right, to stop that genocide.

Sure the party line was all over the WMD, but at least we stopped this from contiuning, and that gives us a valid reason for the invasion.

Or is it because they are Jewish, and we must protect all Jewish people no matter the price.
 

Meuge

Banned
Nov 27, 2005
2,963
0
0
Originally posted by: RichardE
Originally posted by: Meuge
Originally posted by: RichardE
Originally posted by: Trente
Originally posted by: RichardE
meh, who cares. Let Iran deal with its own problems

I'm sickened by some of the responses of you people. sickened, but not surprised.

Why? So we can invade Iran to stop this? To protect 25000 people how many would it costs? Since when is the West the babysitter or the Middle East/Asia
And how many is OK?

You know, to protect 10 million people, how many would it cost? Well, it cost a whole lot more than that actually.

So tell me - how many people is ENOUGH for your highness? How many dead from genocide is OK?

So you agree with the Iraq war?

Pick a reason, WMD (appeal to the masses)

How about the backup ones, Killing all the kurds, (genocide) killing his own people, so I guess that justifies Iraq invasion right, to stop Sadamms genocide. Sure it was WMD, but we at least stopped this.

Or is it because they are Jewish, and we must protect all Jewish people no matter the price.
Don't change the subject.

Answer the question.
 

RichardE

Banned
Dec 31, 2005
10,246
2
0
Originally posted by: Meuge
Originally posted by: RichardE
Originally posted by: Meuge
Originally posted by: RichardE
Originally posted by: Trente
Originally posted by: RichardE
meh, who cares. Let Iran deal with its own problems

I'm sickened by some of the responses of you people. sickened, but not surprised.

Why? So we can invade Iran to stop this? To protect 25000 people how many would it costs? Since when is the West the babysitter or the Middle East/Asia
And how many is OK?

You know, to protect 10 million people, how many would it cost? Well, it cost a whole lot more than that actually.

So tell me - how many people is ENOUGH for your highness? How many dead from genocide is OK?

So you agree with the Iraq war?

Pick a reason, WMD (appeal to the masses)

How about the backup ones, Killing all the kurds, (genocide) killing his own people, so I guess that justifies Iraq invasion right, to stop Sadamms genocide. Sure it was WMD, but we at least stopped this.

Or is it because they are Jewish, and we must protect all Jewish people no matter the price.
Don't change the subject.

Answer the question.


I did. 10 million? If he attacks Israel, Israel will defend herself as she should. For the 25000 in Iran, too bad. Let them deal with there own problems.

Now answer my questions, do you agree with the Iraq war since we stoped a genocide?

Why did we not act on Sudan and Rwanda?

Or do they not matter because they were not Jewish.
 

ahurtt

Diamond Member
Feb 1, 2001
4,283
0
0
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: jrenz
If they don't want to wear their pieces of flair, they can leave.

It's all a dog and pony show by design for an excuse for the U.S. to go in.

Iraq was Saddam and WMD.

iran excuse will be Genocide.

All by design so the U.S. and Oil buddies secure the Oil there too.

I agree. . .some of the courses of action Iran has taken lately seem almost like they are begging for us to bomb the bejeezus out of them. It's like they are daring us or something. It defies logic. . .something is fishy.
 

ahurtt

Diamond Member
Feb 1, 2001
4,283
0
0
Originally posted by: RichardE
Originally posted by: Meuge
Originally posted by: RichardE
Originally posted by: Meuge
Originally posted by: RichardE
Originally posted by: Trente
Originally posted by: RichardE
meh, who cares. Let Iran deal with its own problems

I'm sickened by some of the responses of you people. sickened, but not surprised.

Why? So we can invade Iran to stop this? To protect 25000 people how many would it costs? Since when is the West the babysitter or the Middle East/Asia
And how many is OK?

You know, to protect 10 million people, how many would it cost? Well, it cost a whole lot more than that actually.

So tell me - how many people is ENOUGH for your highness? How many dead from genocide is OK?

So you agree with the Iraq war?

Pick a reason, WMD (appeal to the masses)

How about the backup ones, Killing all the kurds, (genocide) killing his own people, so I guess that justifies Iraq invasion right, to stop Sadamms genocide. Sure it was WMD, but we at least stopped this.

Or is it because they are Jewish, and we must protect all Jewish people no matter the price.
Don't change the subject.

Answer the question.


I did. 10 million? If he attacks Israel, Israel will defend herself as she should. For the 25000 in Iran, too bad. Let them deal with there own problems.

Now answer my questions, do you agree with the Iraq war since we stoped a genocide?

Why did we not act on Sudan and Rwanda?

Or do they not matter because they were not Jewish.

Not because they are not Jewish. Because those places don't have enough oil to merit US getting involved...
That and those people are just blacks.
 

43st

Diamond Member
Nov 7, 2001
3,197
0
0
Originally posted by: ahurtt
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: jrenz
If they don't want to wear their pieces of flair, they can leave.

It's all a dog and pony show by design for an excuse for the U.S. to go in.

Iraq was Saddam and WMD.

iran excuse will be Genocide.

All by design so the U.S. and Oil buddies secure the Oil there too.

I agree. . .some of the courses of action Iran has taken lately seem almost like they are begging for us to bomb the bejeezus out of them. It's like they are daring us or something. It defies logic. . .something is fishy.

Yeah, it's called propaganda. It's why Saddam Hussein was a household name and not some African genocidial dictator. What's his name again? :p
 

RichardE

Banned
Dec 31, 2005
10,246
2
0
Originally posted by: ahurtt
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: jrenz
If they don't want to wear their pieces of flair, they can leave.

It's all a dog and pony show by design for an excuse for the U.S. to go in.

Iraq was Saddam and WMD.

iran excuse will be Genocide.

All by design so the U.S. and Oil buddies secure the Oil there too.

I agree. . .some of the courses of action Iran has taken lately seem almost like they are begging for us to bomb the bejeezus out of them. It's like they are daring us or something. It defies logic. . .something is fishy.

He wants to become a Martyr, to have his name live on forever as the one who begain the downfall of the Empire.

 

Aimster

Lifer
Jan 5, 2003
16,129
2
0
Originally posted by: blackllotus
The fact that Iran currently sanctiosn Jews and Christians is absolutely meaningless. Every step towards polarizing them away from muslims is one step closer to genocide. I'm not saying that there will be a genocide, but Iran needs to be closly monitored.

Iran doesnt sanction Jews and Christians..
 

Aimster

Lifer
Jan 5, 2003
16,129
2
0
Originally posted by: magomago
What about Bah'aiis? Do they have their own color badges? ;)

In all seriousness that is stupid and apparantly it still must be approved:
The law, which must still be approved by Iran's "Supreme Guide" Ali Khamenehi before being put into effect, also establishes special insignia to be worn by non-Muslims.
Lets see how stupid he will be...

That religion is banned inside Iran.
 

Aimster

Lifer
Jan 5, 2003
16,129
2
0
Originally posted by: RichardE
Originally posted by: Trente
Originally posted by: RichardE
meh, who cares. Let Iran deal with its own problems

I'm sickened by some of the responses of you people. sickened, but not surprised.

Why? So we can invade Iran to stop this? To protect 25000 people how many would it costs? Since when is the West the babysitter or the Middle East/Asia

The current Iranian regime is the result of the US sticking their nose where it doesn?t belong. The west loves to control the M.E and you can see just how wonderful the results are. Esp. inside Iraq.

Since the Iranian regime is the result of the US foreign interference .. I say the US must protect all those citizens inside Iran who are threatened by the regime.
 

Aimster

Lifer
Jan 5, 2003
16,129
2
0
To go back to the topic..

Canada is saying the possibility that this is true is high. Then again Canada doesn't like Iran because Iran told Canada to f off when the Iranian police beat up one of their journalist to death and never returned the body.

Also Canada has a lot of Iranians who are anti-regime who feed the government information that they probably made up or got from unreliable sources.

I doubt Canada knows what is going on inside Iran more than people who actually live inside Iran. This is just Canada's way of getting back at Iran and it is working.
 

RichardE

Banned
Dec 31, 2005
10,246
2
0
Originally posted by: Aimster
Originally posted by: RichardE
Originally posted by: Trente
Originally posted by: RichardE
meh, who cares. Let Iran deal with its own problems

I'm sickened by some of the responses of you people. sickened, but not surprised.

Why? So we can invade Iran to stop this? To protect 25000 people how many would it costs? Since when is the West the babysitter or the Middle East/Asia

The current Iranian regime is the result of the US sticking their nose where it doesn?t belong. The west loves to control the M.E and you can see just how wonderful the results are. Esp. inside Iraq.

Since the Iranian regime is the result of the US foreign interference .. I say the US must protect all those citizens inside Iran who are threatened by the regime.

No reason people in the west should have to pay for the sins of our fathers and grandfathers. Someone has to step back from the table eventually. Iran is not the US, the people in Iran, if they wan't change will institue it.

As you said yourself, we see how wonderfull the results are when we stick our nose in, well it should be time to stop doing it. Let the Jewish people in Iran fight for themselves, or let Israel, there "homeland" fight for them.
 

RichardE

Banned
Dec 31, 2005
10,246
2
0
Originally posted by: Aimster
To go back to the topic..

Canada is saying the possibility that this is true is high. Then again Canada doesn't like Iran because Iran told Canada to f off when the Iranian police beat up one of their journalist to death and never returned the body.

Also Canada has a lot of Iranians who are anti-regime who feed the government information that they probably made up or got from unreliable sources.

I doubt Canada knows what is going on inside Iran more than people who actually live inside Iran. This is just Canada's way of getting back at Iran and it is working.

Heh...Story "disapered" I am thinking you might be right. Though a number of sites are still investigating it.

http://jta.org/page_view_breaking_story.asp?intid=2724

http://www.canada.com/topics/news/natio...32-f409-4161-9e96-7bae0436ccc3&k=66789

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?...&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull
 

Orignal Earl

Diamond Member
Oct 27, 2005
8,059
55
86
Originally posted by: ahurtt
It's like they are daring us or something. It defies logic. . .something is fishy.

This usually means there is more to the story then what we are led to believe. I have read on another forum that this is so they won't be arrested for breaking Muslim laws?
 

Aimster

Lifer
Jan 5, 2003
16,129
2
0
Originally posted by: Orignal Earl
Originally posted by: ahurtt
It's like they are daring us or something. It defies logic. . .something is fishy.

This usually means there is more to the story then what we are led to believe. I have read on another forum that this is so they won't be arrested for breaking Muslim laws?

Jews have most of the same laws as Muslims. The only major thing is dress code and everyone inside Iran must follow them. If you look at my blog you can see people have found ways to kind of go around them but everyone must still follow them (women).

There is no point to this law because it's not like Jews stick out from Muslims on the street. They live the same basic life Muslims do.

This law is total crap if true and there is no justification for it other than pure hate and I hope the people off Iran throw rocks at the mullah's heads.
 

5150Joker

Diamond Member
Feb 6, 2002
5,549
0
71
www.techinferno.com
Originally posted by: RichardE
Originally posted by: Meuge
Originally posted by: RichardE
Originally posted by: Trente
Originally posted by: RichardE
meh, who cares. Let Iran deal with its own problems

I'm sickened by some of the responses of you people. sickened, but not surprised.

Why? So we can invade Iran to stop this? To protect 25000 people how many would it costs? Since when is the West the babysitter or the Middle East/Asia
And how many is OK?

You know, to protect 10 million people, how many would it cost? Well, it cost a whole lot more than that actually.

So tell me - how many people is ENOUGH for your highness? How many dead from genocide is OK?

So you agree with the Iraq war?

Pick a reason, WMD (appeal to the masses)

How about the backup ones, Killing all the kurds, (genocide) killing his own people, so I guess that justifies Iraq invasion right, to stop that genocide.

Sure the party line was all over the WMD, but at least we stopped this from contiuning, and that gives us a valid reason for the invasion.

Or is it because they are Jewish, and we must protect all Jewish people no matter the price.



Of course, Meuge is a Jew that wants to bomb millions of Muslims (he said it) but thinks 25k Jews should be protected at all costs (read: at the cost of Muslims). No surprise there. Utter words of genocide against Muslims and it's A-OK but say something about a Jew and the Mossad/CIA/FBI and every other organization starts investigating you...oh the hypocrisy.