Originally posted by: Ultra Quiet
Originally posted by: alchemize
Originally posted by: Ultra Quiet
Lesson 2: Don't use draftees. They do nothing but whine and piss and moan for the next 50 years of their lives.
That's about the stupidest, most fscked up thing I've ever seen you post.
I'm sure I've posted worse
An inappropriate jab at Whitling, I retract said post.
OK let's make it "Don't use draftees. A volunteer army is much more effective and motivated".
And again I will take issue with your statement. You have no empirical evidence on whether or not a volunteer Army is more effective. As a matter of fact I would say the opposite was true. All one has to do is look at both World Wars, Korea, Viet Nam. In both WW their motivation and effectiveness is obvious. In Korea and Viet Nam, which just for the sake of argument we'll call a tie and a loss, it was not the ineffectiveness or lack of motivation that resulted in those outcomes but rather the political, strategic and tactical decisions made by politicians, the civilian leadership and the
career military officers.
Draftees have served, fought and died honorably and with valor throughout our nations history. The almost unstoppable juggernaut that is today's .mil was built on the backs and written in the blood of those draftees that served when called. To suggest otherwise is an insult to them and dishonors the thousands that served. There are more than a few on this board.
For the record I am against a draft not because they are not wanted, unmotivated or ineffective but because I think it flies in the face of the very freedoms this country was founded upon. The freedoms of choice and self determination. I would only be supportive of a draft after a formal declaration of war and a determination that the all volunteer force would be insufficient.