Portable browsers

Mr. Pedantic

Diamond Member
Feb 14, 2010
5,027
0
76
...they suck.

I got into this because I originally needed Google Body at uni as a reference, and neither the Firefox 3.6 nor IE 8 that was on my University's computers at the time (they still are, unfortunately) cut the mustard. So for the time being every time I started a session on the computers I would download and install Google Chrome. Without admin rights the browser would run, but it wouldn't save anything on my account. So while I did this I started thinking of ways I could improve on this.

A few days ago two things happened. I read an article in Ars, I think, about the productivity available purely in a web browser with Google Apps. I also read that there was a Portable version of Google Chrome out there. It took a while for 2 and 2 to come together since a lot was happening in my life at the time, but afterwards I thought how great an idea this would be. Solve my Google Body problem AND my dropbox problem by using Google Docs!

So I download it, install it onto a 16GB USB flash drive which is no slouch by any stretch of the imagination, if only by virtue of its size, and I test it out on my laptop for a few days before taking it to uni. It starts out okay, but in general, it's really, really SLOW. During my research I find that Firefox 4 and Opera 11 are also portable. I try these two. Both are still slow. In order of speed, fastest to slowest: Opera, Chrome, and Firefox, trailing by a mile.

I don't know whether it's because I got used to the SSD in my desktop, or because USB2.0 is too slow even compared to a SATA hard drive, or because there's some extra things going on in my laptop that are slowing down a Portable install more than a normal one, but none of the browsers are as fast as their normal equivalents. Opera and Chrome are the closest; I'd classify both those as being close to IE8 in speed. Firefox 4...oh dear. With no exaggeration whatsoever, I'd expect a desktop installation of IE6 to be faster. That is how god-awful it is.

I would like to point out that just by virtue of the fact that I can have addons, WebGL, HTML5, bookmarks, etc. on these browsers makes them infinitely better than using the browsers built in on my uni workstations; it's just that I feel they could be a whole lot better.
 

Modelworks

Lifer
Feb 22, 2007
16,240
7
76
USB drives often do not perform as well as they claim on the packaging. To get ones that max out USB you usually have to pay a premium. I would test the throughput of the USB drive. I have found that 20MB/sec is what I need to be able to read/write using portable apps and not feel like the app is slow.


One of the fastest drives is from a company called kanguru.
https://www.kanguru.com/index.php/flash-drives/secure-storage/kanguru-defender-elite
 
Last edited:

lxskllr

No Lifer
Nov 30, 2004
57,912
8,178
126
Firefox especially, makes a lot of writes to the hd(usb drive in this case), and that can really slow things down depending on the speed of the drive. Look up tweaks for the various browsers. Use Eee in your search terms. There's a fair amount of tweak suggestions for the old Eees that used slow SSDs.

Maybe you could boot a light Linux on the computers? The tiny distros run completely in ram, so that would be as fast as you could get with the given hardware.