• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Porsche Cayenne owned by a traffic sign

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Meh, ain't no thang. You know the bitch driving it will just buy another one, or have her pimp daddy buy another one for her.
 
Originally posted by: Nebor
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
another suv owner learning that suvs don't have anymore brakes than cars?

That SUV has way more brakes than just about any car. 😛

Correct.

Stand on the brake pedal, however, and the Cayenne S stopped in less distance (111 feet) from 60 mph than a race-ready Porsche 911 GT3 (113 feet). From 100 mph, the two Porsches tied at 318 feet--astoundingly good brakes, and the FX45 was a couple feet longer.
 
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
another suv owner learning that suvs don't have anymore brakes than cars?
Except that the Cayenne comes with a 4-pot big brake kit and stops faster than many sports cars... :roll:


More like another SUV driver discovering that it's pretty damn hard to steer when you have one hand on the cell phone and another holding your latte...
 
Chalk another one up for us Masshole drivers--if you can survive behind the wheel here, you can survive anywhere! 😀
 
Originally posted by: iamwiz82
Originally posted by: Nebor
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
another suv owner learning that suvs don't have anymore brakes than cars?

That SUV has way more brakes than just about any car. 😛

Correct.

Stand on the brake pedal, however, and the Cayenne S stopped in less distance (111 feet) from 60 mph than a race-ready Porsche 911 GT3 (113 feet). From 100 mph, the two Porsches tied at 318 feet--astoundingly good brakes, and the FX45 was a couple feet longer.

shwing
 
Originally posted by: Salvatore
A post in that thread makes an interesting observation...the three other cars in the first picture are all Siennas. Weird.

Yea I noticed the 2 parked, then noticed the third when that guy said something. That is definetely freaky weird.
 
Originally posted by: Salvatore
A post in that thread makes an interesting observation...the three other cars in the first picture are all Siennas. Weird.
That's because toyotas sell well.
 
Originally posted by: amdfanboy
Hahah, West Newton

ROTFL.. yep. The irony is, the drivers around here, seem to think that because they are driving a "fabulously expensive" car, that everyone (and in this case, everything, including inanimate objects), should simply "get out of their way".

I saw it once in Boston too, some guy in a - get this - a Fiero, pulls right out into the middle of heavy Boston traffic. Well, nobody made room for him. *boom* goes his plastic car. It was actually kind of funny. I seriously have no idea how those drivers can have those sorts of thought-patterns.

You from around here too?
 
Originally posted by: AStar617
Chalk another one up for us Masshole drivers--if you can survive behind the wheel here, you can survive anywhere! 😀
LOL. Amen!

Rt. 128 during rush-hour will definately seperate the men from the boys behind the wheel.
 
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
another suv owner learning that suvs don't have anymore brakes than cars?
Except that the Cayenne comes with a 4-pot big brake kit and stops faster than many sports cars... :roll:


More like another SUV driver discovering that it's pretty damn hard to steer when you have one hand on the cell phone and another holding your latte...

yes but the limiting factor isn't the brakes, its traction between tire and road. so basically snow/ice nullifies its bigger brakes😛 the point was that cars have 4 brakes, and so do suvs.

 
Back
Top