• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Porn biz's thoughts on new DVD specs. . . blu ray vs hd dvd

actually wasn't there a post about porn and high definition awhile back that said the porn industry didn't really like it because it would show more of the defects in their "performers"? Like a lot of things that makeup can't hide or whatever
 
Originally posted by: PoPPeR
actually wasn't there a post about porn and high definition awhile back that said the porn industry didn't really like it because it would show more of the defects in their "performers"? Like a lot of things that makeup can't hide or whatever

that probably means that in HD you can see their scars from having had 8,000 plastic surgeries to get 38FFF titties.
 
Originally posted by: RaynorWolfcastle
Originally posted by: PoPPeR
actually wasn't there a post about porn and high definition awhile back that said the porn industry didn't really like it because it would show more of the defects in their "performers"? Like a lot of things that makeup can't hide or whatever

that probably means that in HD you can see their scars from having had 8,000 plastic surgeries to get 38FFF titties.
i can already see those damn things 🙁

 
I was just thinking, why not have both? It seems like alot of porn is advertised on the net. So, why not have machines that can make both formats, and sell the customer the version they want? Print it as they are requested. Then there's no inventory either. Save money right?
 
Originally posted by: RaynorWolfcastle
Originally posted by: PoPPeR
actually wasn't there a post about porn and high definition awhile back that said the porn industry didn't really like it because it would show more of the defects in their "performers"? Like a lot of things that makeup can't hide or whatever

that probably means that in HD you can see their scars from having had 8,000 plastic surgeries to get 38FFF titties.

You don't need HD to see all the cheap boob job scars. Just stick w/ itty bitty titty amateur chicks.
 
Cost overrules all. Bottom line is that even though HD-DVD has a little less disk space, it still offers HD content at lower manufacturing costs.

The big companies don't care if Mr. AV Guy prefers Blu-Ray for its technical superiority; all they care about is that the average Joe Consumer is happy, and that they make the most profit per sale.
 
Originally posted by: PoPPeR
actually wasn't there a post about porn and high definition awhile back that said the porn industry didn't really like it because it would show more of the defects in their "performers"? Like a lot of things that makeup can't hide or whatever
yay for zits, razor burn, bruises, and herpes sores in HD!
 
Originally posted by: PoPPeR
actually wasn't there a post about porn and high definition awhile back that said the porn industry didn't really like it because it would show more of the defects in their "performers"? Like a lot of things that makeup can't hide or whatever

Which is silly in the face of that statement, because any production house that cares enough to
buy the equipment to make HD movies will also be able to afford (and have probably already bought)
the computing power and applications needed to remove "defects" in filming as easily as photoshop is
used for magazine shoots now.

Porn in HD :thumbsup:

Extreme closeups of Ron Jeremy's butt in HD :thumbsdown:





 
Back
Top