Originally posted by: compudog
Interesting. When will it end??? So if MS doesn't include Java, you go and get it from Sun. So what?
bcause Bill is a controll freak!Originally posted by: SuperTool
Originally posted by: compudog
Interesting. When will it end??? So if MS doesn't include Java, you go and get it from Sun. So what?
Because when you come to a webpage that uses Java, it points you to a MS page that says "Plugin not available" instead of pointing you to a page where you can download the plugin.
Why is asp and .net automatically installed while java is not? Why not have the users manually go to MS website to download .NET, instead of packaging it with Windows? Microsoft is an Illegal Monopoly, so they have to play by certain rules.
Great, then they can kill off flash support for all non-MS operating systems to help preserve their desktop monopoly and help with taking over PDAs and set-top boxes.Flash would give Microsoft access to tools for building rich interfaces on both desktops and mobile devices, furthering .NET.
An acquisition, though, would be seen as a hostile move deliberately designed to thwart J2EE uptake.
Actually forcing Microsoft to pay a dividend to shareholders would likely increase the value of the stock and take away their "crush fund" at the same time. Anyone with mutual funds (in a 401k for example) would benefit. I wouldn't say no to a $20 per copy refund for past Windows purchases thoughOriginally posted by: GroundZero
shall we start a list for the next class action lawsuit?
power to the people, give some of that cash back to the people.
getting tired of "states" suing for these huge settlements and the people of the states not getting squat!
how much cash did any smokers get from the tobacco lawsuits?
all to the government, who will siphon it off to programs that benefit them and not us "the people"
That is because MS corrupted Java, and applications written for MS java don't work well with regular Java. That was the whole reason for all these lawsuits.Originally posted by: RichieZZZZ
I hate Sun Java 2 VM, all the machines in my school labs have it installed (various NT4, 2K Pro, and XP Pro boxes). AIM express never works right, and the machines often crash when going to pages that heavily use java. In my limited expereience the Sun Java VM is inferior
Originally posted by: DaveSimmons
Actually forcing Microsoft to pay a dividend to shareholders would likely increase the value of the stock and take away their "crush fund" at the same time. Anyone with mutual funds (in a 401k for example) would benefit. I wouldn't say no to a $20 per copy refund for past Windows purchases thoughOriginally posted by: GroundZero
shall we start a list for the next class action lawsuit?
power to the people, give some of that cash back to the people.
getting tired of "states" suing for these huge settlements and the people of the states not getting squat!
how much cash did any smokers get from the tobacco lawsuits?
all to the government, who will siphon it off to programs that benefit them and not us "the people"![]()
I asked java developers in the Software forum about MS vs Sun VMs since we might be doing a small java app at work. Apparently the MS VM is now years out of date and missing the user interface libraries needed for any serious work.Originally posted by: RichieZZZZ
I hate Sun Java 2 VM, all the machines in my school labs have it installed (various NT4, 2K Pro, and XP Pro boxes). AIM express never works right, and the machines often crash when going to pages that heavily use java. In my limited expereience the Sun Java VM is inferior
In the MS suits the settlements were for minor changes in behavior not for any cash. The only cash MS is paying out is a pittance to cover the states' legal fees.Originally posted by: GroundZero
Originally posted by: DaveSimmons
Actually forcing Microsoft to pay a dividend to shareholders would likely increase the value of the stock and take away their "crush fund" at the same time. Anyone with mutual funds (in a 401k for example) would benefit. I wouldn't say no to a $20 per copy refund for past Windows purchases though![]()
not talking share holders...
consumers....
if the states can get all that cash, why can't the purchasers of their monopoly product, get in on the cash cow?
I agree with you. I'd hate to see MS throw the corporate spin on such a great developer-minded company like Macromedia. But let's see here...Originally posted by: Czar
ARGG!!!!!!!:|
Microsoft can buy just about any company out there, BUT LEAVE MACROMEDIA ALONE!!!
Originally posted by: GroundZero
shall we start a list for the next class action lawsuit?
power to the people, give some of that cash back to the people.
getting tired of "states" suing for these huge settlements and the people of the states not getting squat!
how much cash did any smokers get from the tobacco lawsuits?
all to the government, who will siphon it off to programs that benefit them and not us "the people"
Originally posted by: SuperTool
Originally posted by: compudog
Interesting. When will it end??? So if MS doesn't include Java, you go and get it from Sun. So what?
Because when you come to a webpage that uses Java, it points you to a MS page that says "Plugin not available" instead of pointing you to a page where you can download the plugin.
Why is asp and .net automatically installed while java is not? Why not have the users manually go to MS website to download .NET, instead of packaging it with Windows? Microsoft is an Illegal Monopoly, so they have to play by certain rules.
Originally posted by: ViRGE
Am I the only one that sees a problem with this? Doesn't imposing the will of Sun onto Microsoft violate something? Or at the very least lower them to the same level? Microsoft wasn't preventing Java from running on their OS, they simply did not bundle a competing product. What's next, a copy of Linux with Windows, since Windows is also trying to edge out Linux?
Originally posted by: HendrixFan
Originally posted by: ViRGE
Am I the only one that sees a problem with this? Doesn't imposing the will of Sun onto Microsoft violate something? Or at the very least lower them to the same level? Microsoft wasn't preventing Java from running on their OS, they simply did not bundle a competing product. What's next, a copy of Linux with Windows, since Windows is also trying to edge out Linux?
This is all about a CONTRACT. Sun and MS signed a contract whereby Windows would have Java bundled with it. MS used their own version of Java that wasnt compatible with Sun's Java, and Sun claimed it to be a breech of contract. The Judge agreed, and forced MS to bundle Sun's Java with Windows, as per their contractual agreement.
Originally posted by: SuperTool
That is because MS corrupted Java, and applications written for MS java don't work well with regular Java. That was the whole reason for all these lawsuits.Originally posted by: RichieZZZZ
I hate Sun Java 2 VM, all the machines in my school labs have it installed (various NT4, 2K Pro, and XP Pro boxes). AIM express never works right, and the machines often crash when going to pages that heavily use java. In my limited expereience the Sun Java VM is inferior