Originally posted by: EatSpam
Wow, so there'd be people who would destroy American freedoms to "save" them? People would actually accept troops in our cities and martial law? Wow.
Originally posted by: EatSpam
Wow, so there'd be people who would destroy American freedoms to "save" them? People would actually accept troops in our cities and martial law? Wow.
Originally posted by: Deudalus
Originally posted by: EatSpam
Wow, so there'd be people who would destroy American freedoms to "save" them? People would actually accept troops in our cities and martial law? Wow.
Truman did it badly.
Carter did it.
Lincoln did it badly.
Clinton did it.
Bush is doing it now.
Pardon me if I don't buy into the arguement that the sky is falling.
Did what, exactly? I don't recall martial law being declared in my lifetime?
Originally posted by: AragornTK
You forgot the last question in the poll: "Is this a loaded poll, slanted to fit my liberal beliefs?" Only one option possible, Yes
Originally posted by: Deudalus
Did what, exactly? I don't recall martial law being declared in my lifetime?
You truly don't know?
Truman rounded up the Japanese, stuck them in camps, and took their land.
Lincoln deported people who disagreed with his politics. He sent in the army to stop an elected body from voting in Maryland.
Clinton approved warrantless wire taps in a spying case of Aldrich Ames. "WASH POST, July 15, 1994: Extend not only to searches of the homes of U.S. citizens but also -- in the delicate words of a Justice Department official -- to "places where you wouldn't find or would be unlikely to find information involving a U.S. citizen... would allow the government to use classified electronic surveillance techniques, such as infrared sensors to observe people inside their homes, without a court order." Deputy Attorney General Jamie S. Gorelick, the Clinton administration believes the president "has inherent authority to conduct warrantless searches for foreign intelligence purposes." Secret searches and wiretaps of Aldrich Ames's office and home in June and October 1993 by the Clinton Administration, both without a federal warrant."
Carter signed an executive order which allowed electronic surveillance to acquire foreign intelligence without a court order.
Have you really never heard of these things?
But I have to ask, would you support full blown martial law and troops in the streets?
Originally posted by: oldman420
How do you feel about the theory of the unitary executive?
Has the executive gone too far?
What are the implications?
What he said.Originally posted by: Vadatajs
is our way of life in jeopardy? are we doomed to failure?
Is a 2 part question: Yes:No
Originally posted by: Condor
I would join armed troops in my town in hunting terrorists.
Originally posted by: Deudalus
But I have to ask, would you support full blown martial law and troops in the streets?
Under what scenario?
Any scenario at all, you name it. Because I don't care what happens, I do not and will not ever support martial law in America. If that were to happen, America will die.
Originally posted by: Deudalus
Any scenario at all, you name it. Because I don't care what happens, I do not and will not ever support martial law in America. If that were to happen, America will die.
What if we were invaded?
What if a string of dirty bombs go off and we know that more are going to?
Ask yourself this question:
If America were truly in jeopardy of being destroyed, would you cling to your freedoms which you would inevitably lose by the loss of your country or would you understand that freedoms are worthless without the country that provides for them?
Lincoln and Truman got it right when they realized that the number one job of the president is to defend the country and make sure that it continues to exist. Our constitution is worthless without the country that safeguards it.
Originally posted by: EatSpam
Originally posted by: Deudalus
Any scenario at all, you name it. Because I don't care what happens, I do not and will not ever support martial law in America. If that were to happen, America will die.
What if we were invaded?
What if a string of dirty bombs go off and we know that more are going to?
Ask yourself this question:
If America were truly in jeopardy of being destroyed, would you cling to your freedoms which you would inevitably lose by the loss of your country or would you understand that freedoms are worthless without the country that provides for them?
Lincoln and Truman got it right when they realized that the number one job of the president is to defend the country and make sure that it continues to exist. Our constitution is worthless without the country that safeguards it.
If America were going to be destroyed, I'd rather it be destroyed a free nation than as some fascist military-run state.
