Poll: Would you Switch to Mac OS X if you could run it on PC hardware?

batmanuel

Platinum Member
Jan 15, 2003
2,144
0
0
I've always wanted to run OS X, but I could never stomach the high hardware prices or give up the fun of building a system from scratch myself. I'm asking all of you, if given a chance to run OS X on your regular PC hardware, would you also defect from MS if Apple gave you a real choice and allowed you to run OS X on x86 based systems?

Be honest, I'm thinking about sending the results of this poll at Apple to try to get them to open up their OS to us PC users. I don't think it'll make any difference in the end, but I at least want to make my plea.
 

dawks

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
5,071
2
81
I would definatly try it.

Quartz is awesome. Exposé is sweet.. The GUI is far superior..

As far as I can tell, its what everyone wants. Its Linux (UNIX), with a nice GUI, TONS of applications, and easy application installation. Plus, its not Microsoft.

I dont understand why so many Linux guru's dislike it.
 

arsbanned

Banned
Dec 12, 2003
4,853
0
0
DaZ, there is a disconnect between sentence 1 & 2 of your post. And then there is the disconnect between your post as a whole and reality.
 

InlineFive

Diamond Member
Sep 20, 2003
9,599
2
0
I would try it. However as long as I could use Linux techniques to hack it. Otherwise there's not enough tweaking options for me. I love the Windows Registry! :D

-Por
 

SpeedFreak03

Golden Member
Apr 13, 2003
1,094
0
0
Originally posted by: GonzoDaGr8
I voted yes just for the hell of it allthough it'll never see the light of day.

me too it would be awesome but i know it will never happen, because then wat reason to most people have (other than video stuff and apple fanboys) to buy a mac?

-Josh
 

Monoman

Platinum Member
Mar 4, 2001
2,163
0
76
Originally posted by: DaZ
I would definatly try it. Quartz is awesome. Exposé is sweet.. The GUI is far superior.. As far as I can tell, its what everyone wants. Its Linux (UNIX), with a nice GUI, TONS of applications, and easy application installation. Plus, its not Microsoft. I dont understand why so many Linux guru's dislike it.

whaaaa... the linux guru's? last I heard the 10.3 ran of a freeBSD kernel and was rock solid. I Think I am in no way a guru but I can hold my own, I would love to run OSX on my x86. FreeBSD is so solid and reliable. enough said.

Mitch

 

Ionizer86

Diamond Member
Jun 20, 2001
5,292
0
76
Maybe the poll can be modified to add another option: "I'd try OSX and then decide" ;) That's what I'd do, give it a test run first.
 

cleverhandle

Diamond Member
Dec 17, 2001
3,566
3
81
Originally posted by: DaZ
I dont understand why so many Linux guru's dislike it.
What makes you think that? Most Linux peeps I talk with have a lot of love for OSX. It's just too damn expensive, especially if you have enough Linux knowledge to set up a box and do it well. Granted, my Debian install isn't as slick as OSX, but it's pretty darn nice - certainly not worth $1000+ of hardware up front plus the difficulties of upgrading in the future.

 

MrYogi

Platinum Member
Mar 15, 2003
2,680
0
0
i've worked with os x since the day it came out. believe me windows and linux is 1000,000,000 times better.
 

EeyoreX

Platinum Member
Oct 27, 2002
2,864
0
0
I didn't vote, since I would also "try it out and then decide".

As far as I can tell, its what everyone wants. Its Linux (UNIX), with a nice GUI,
I don't want Linux. Please don't lump me into "everyone" category. I have no problem with Linux users, I simply don't like Linux and don't want to run it.
TONS of applications,
There may be a lot of applications for the Mac. There are still many many more (especially games) for Windows.
Plus, its not Microsoft.
I don't have a problem with Microsoft. Windows isn't perfect (anyone who tries to claim any other OS is perfect is lying to themselves (read: fanboy), delusional, and/or just plain wrong) but Windows has always worked for me without any real issues.

\Dan
 

n0cmonkey

Elite Member
Jun 10, 2001
42,936
1
0
I decided to lump all of this into one post, backwards. Where the hell did all of the misinformation come from? It's almost like this crap was posted in ATOT and moved here to spoil the minds of the rest of the forum.

Originally posted by: DaZ
Its Linux (UNIX),

Wrong.

I dont understand why so many Linux guru's dislike it.

Which Linux gurus do you talk to? I know atleast one person that without whom, Unix-like systems probably wouldn't be as popular as they are today, uses Mac OS X (and Linux).

Originally posted by: EeyoreX
I don't want Linux.

You're in luck, Mac OS X is not Linux.

Originally posted by: Monoman
last I heard the 10.3 ran of a freeBSD kernel

You heard wrong, Mac OS X is not running a FreeBSD kernel.

Originally posted by: batmanuel
I've always wanted to run OS X, but I could never stomach the high hardware prices or give up the fun of building a system from scratch myself.

You can build a Mac from scratch. Someone from ars did it a while back. And that was closer to building a computer than all of this buying parts and putting them in a spiffy case that came with a window and neon already installed stuff. :D

Be honest, I'm thinking about sending the results of this poll at Apple to try to get them to open up their OS to us PC users.

And in comes Darwin. The core of Mac OS X. It runs on x86 hardware. You're welcome.

And now for better information:

The kernel: Not FreeBSD. Not Linux. Is Mach.
The userland: Free/NetBSD. Some GNU stuff thrown in (grep, probably more).
The development tools: GNU mostly. Apple has put some time and effort into GCC and Objective-C.
Mac OS X on x86: Darwin is the core of Mac OS X. It works on x86. No gui, but XFree86 works just fine.
 

Monoman

Platinum Member
Mar 4, 2001
2,163
0
76
Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Originally posted by: Monoman last I heard the 10.3 ran of a freeBSD kernel
You heard wrong, Mac OS X is not running a FreeBSD kernel.

well, not to say your wrongs or anything, but your wrong and so was I. It uses A BSD kernel and a MACH kernel (remember, it's kernel is BASED of these, not using the exact one)

and I quote from the Mac OSX website...

"Beneath the easy-to-use interface and rich graphics of Mac OS X is Darwin, an open source UNIX-based foundation built on technologies such as FreeBSD, Mach, Apache, and GCC. Darwin provides a complete UNIX environment, with X11 and POSIX services comparable to Linux or FreeBSD, including familiar kernel, libraries, networking and command-line utilities."

if you care to know it's at the bottom of this page.....

Here is another page to read up on to where it explains it a little more indepth

Mitch



p.s. If I am comming of like a jerk, I'm not trying to. Just a little friendly debate ;)


EDIT: spelling
 

tazmius

Junior Member
Dec 2, 2003
18
0
0
Does Darwin contain a GUI or is it all just command line? I'd be willing to try it on a spare box I had if it had GUI.

Have you tried Darwin yourself? If so can you post your thoughts / opinions on it?

Taz

EDIT:

Sorry, just read the last part of your post about using Xfree......so I answered that part already.
 

Monoman

Platinum Member
Mar 4, 2001
2,163
0
76
Originally posted by: PorBleemo
Originally posted by: GonzoDaGr8
I love the Windows Registry!
God I hope you are just joking Porbleemo..;)
I know it can be a pain but all the options that you can tweak and possibly send your computer sky high is fun. -Por

you mean straight to the crapper right
rolleye.gif
:)
 

n0cmonkey

Elite Member
Jun 10, 2001
42,936
1
0
Originally posted by: Monoman
Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Originally posted by: Monoman last I heard the 10.3 ran of a freeBSD kernel
You heard wrong, Mac OS X is not running a FreeBSD kernel.

well, not to say your wrongs or anything, but your wrong and so was I. It uses A BSD kernel and a MACH kernel (remember, it's kernel is BASED of these, not using the exact one)

It is not a BSD kernel. It is based on MACH 3.0. It is a BSD userland (with some gnu), like I said.

and I quote from the Mac OSX website...

"Beneath the easy-to-use interface and rich graphics of Mac OS X is <a href="/macosx/features/darwin/">Darwin</a>, an open source UNIX-based foundation built on technologies such as <STRONG>FreeBSD</strong>, <STRONG>Mach</strong>, <a href="/macosx/features/websharing/">Apache</a>, and GCC. Darwin provides a complete UNIX environment, with <a href="/macosx/features/x11/">X11</a> and POSIX services comparable to Linux or FreeBSD, including familiar kernel, libraries, networking and command-line utilities."

So if you take this to mean that FreeBSD and MACH both make up the kernel (beyond the typical code sharing in open source (if we want to include that we can say that Linux is a mix of Linux and FreeBSD technologies), then Apache and GCC are somehow parts of the kernel?

if you care to know it's at the bottom of <a class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.apple.com/macosx/architecture/" target=blank>this</a> page.....

<a class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.apple.com/macosx/features/unix/" target=blank>Here</a> is another page to read up on to where it explains it a little more indepth

Mitch

The most widely-distributed UNIX-based operating system, Mac OS X offers a unique combination of technical elements to the discerning geek, such as the fine-grained multithreading of the Mach 3.0 kernel, tight hardware integration and SMP-safe drivers, as well as zero configuration networking. Panther integrates features from state-of-the-art FreeBSD 5 into Darwin, the Open Source base of Mac OS X, to provide enhanced performance, compatibility and usability.

:D

p.s. If I am comming of like a jerk, I'm not trying to. Just a little friendly debate ;)

Less of a jerk than I was. I can diggit. ;)


[localhost:/] n0c% uname -a
Darwin localhost 5.5 Darwin Kernel Version 5.5: Thu May 30 14:51:26 PDT 2002; root:xnu/xnu-201.42.3.obj~1/RELEASE_PPC Power Macintosh powerpc
[localhost:/] n0c% file mach_kernel
mach_kernel: Mach-O executable ppc
[localhost:/] n0c% strings mach_kernel | grep BSD
setconf: IOFindBSDRoot returned an error (%d);setting rootdevice to 'sd0a'.
BSD Name
IOKitBSDInit
IOBSD
BSD Major
BSD Minor
BSD root: %s
BSD Component Version 5.5:


Mac OS X 10.1.5. Not the latest and greatest, but I doubt they did a complete kernel switch. Remember that Mac OS X is not a new OS really, it is built on NeXT technologies too. NeXT didn't run on FreeBSD's kernel, I think it was an earlier MACH ;) (not positive about the kernel origins odd NeXT, I haven't gotten a working NeXT machine yet :()

I don't have a FreeBSD machine, but I'll substitute OpenBSD instead (FreeBSDers or Mac OS X 10.3.xers can prove me wrong, or right by posting):
gorilla $ uname -a
OpenBSD gorilla 3.4 GENERIC#4 i386
gorilla $ cd /
gorilla $ file bsd
bsd: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1, statically linked, not stripped
gorilla $ strings bsd | grep BSD
OpenBSD
OpenBSD
Copyright (c) 1995-2003 OpenBSD. All rights reserved. http://www.OpenBSD.org
OpenBSD-current
dkcsum: warning: dup BSD->BIOS disk mapping
FreeBSD
OpenBSD
@(#)OpenBSD 3.4-current (GENERIC) #4: Sun Nov 30 05:47:10 EST 2003
OpenBSD 3.4-current (GENERIC) #4: Sun Nov 30 05:47:10 EST 2003

And I am right. As usual ;) (any more substantial proof against my points here is definitely welcome and appreciated)
 

n0cmonkey

Elite Member
Jun 10, 2001
42,936
1
0
Originally posted by: tazmius
Does Darwin contain a GUI or is it all just command line? I'd be willing to try it on a spare box I had if it had GUI.

Have you tried Darwin yourself? If so can you post your thoughts / opinions on it?

Taz

EDIT:

Sorry, just read the last part of your post about using Xfree......so I answered that part already.

I use it daily. My main "workstation" at home is an ibook.
 

Monoman

Platinum Member
Mar 4, 2001
2,163
0
76
Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
And I am right. As usual ;) (any more substantial proof against my points here is definitely welcome and appreciated)


we are basically saying the same thing. my wording came a little lose from the :beer: but none the less, Darwin is a composite of MACH 3.0 and FreeBSD kernels.

glad your not a sore loser ;)

Mitch
 

Nothinman

Elite Member
Sep 14, 2001
30,672
0
0
No, I already have Linux and there's nothing that OS X would offer above that. Infact I really dislike the BSD userland so if I was given a PPC machine with OS X it would probably have Debian/PPC on it in a day or so.
 

Epsil0n00

Golden Member
Aug 29, 2001
1,187
0
76
Originally posted by: SpeedFreak03
then wat reason to most people have (other than video stuff and apple fanboys) to buy a mac?
-Josh

Ummm... the same reasons that people purchase Alienware and Voodoo brand PCs: designer cases, extreme hardware and large price tags!
 

Barnaby W. Füi

Elite Member
Aug 14, 2001
12,343
0
0
The thing that makes OSX better than the BSDs or Linux is Aqua. IMO unless you're an OS hacker or just a complete apple fanatic, there isn't much or any reason to run darwin.

And as far as the operating system itself (ignoring the gui), OSX seems much more of a pain than Linux or the BSDs. A lot of the traditional unixisms have been apple-ized, and it just feels foreign and obtuse.

And debian or freebsd ports are a lot nicer to deal with than fink (more packages, more integrated with the system).

But like anything else, it boils down to personal preference. I know a guy who runs a bunch of OSX servers and he likes it a lot.

Edit: btw, you could run X11 in full screen mode on OSX, install some X11 apps, put a PC monitor and mouse on it, hide the box, and a person could probably go a while before they realized it was OSX. Kinda neat. ;)