POLL: Would you support U.S. military action against Iraq?

[StageLeft]

Blatant ripoff from CNN.

Take in mind that you may agree he has to go but don't agree that a full invasion of another country in the mid east is necessarily the way to do it. That's my opinion anyway. I think it opens a can of worms but I'm on the fence over this one.

 

[Linflas]

Originally posted by: Skoorb
Blatant ripoff from CNN.

Take in mind that you may agree he has to go but don't agree that a full invasion of another country in the mid east is necessarily the way to do it. That's my opinion anyway. I think it opens a can of worms but I'm on the fence over this one.

Fortunately they were still teaching history when I went to school and they taught us the end result of ignoring Hitler's military buildup, the Anschluss, the takeover of the Sudetenland, the alliance with Japan, Italy, and Russia, and ultimately the invasion of Poland.

 

[Digobick]

Here's the CNN story associated with that poll.

 

[Mister T]

smoke em

 

[SaltBoy]

I wouldn't favor action again Iraq itself, but if it's needed to get rid of Hussein, I'm all for it. The ends justify the means.

 

[Stark]

affirmative

 

[Skyclad1uhm1]

Didn't Bush give the CIA a sh!tload of cash earlier on to go and kill Saddam? Wonder what they did with that cash...

 

[Siddhartha]

Please explain to me why the US should invade Iraq or topple Hussein.

 

[DevilsAdvocate]

Absofrigginlutely.

 

[AmigaMan]

I'm curious as to whether Bush has some information, that he naturally won't share with the public, that links Hussein to al-queada/Bin Laden...
if so that's probably the reason he's doing it and I would support it regardless. However, what happens after we get rid of him?

 

[StageLeft]

Originally posted by: AmigaMan
I'm curious as to whether Bush has some information, that he naturally won't share with the public, that links Hussein to al-queada/Bin Laden...
if so that's probably the reason he's doing it and I would support it regardless. However, what happens after we get rid of him?

Quite possibly. Afterall there are way more terrorists (that we know of) from saudi arabia than from iraq.

 

[SaltBoy]

Originally posted by: Dr Smooth
Please explain to me why the US should invade Iraq or topple Hussein.

Do you really not know? 😕

 

[B00ne]

Do u have any sound reason to attack a country which is admittedly ruled by despot but whose ppl are starving to death and their children dying because we deny them medicine??

Or is it just to get rid of old weapons? Or is the oil in Kuweit getting empty and now u need to suck out Iraq, or maybe because daddy didnt finish the job, so the little son gets the chance to play in the sandbox too? Or even better, U have new weapons - time to test them...

 

[UltraQuiet]

Originally posted by: B00ne
Do u have any sound reason to attack a country which is admittedly ruled by despot but whose ppl are starving to death and their children dying because we deny them medicine??

Or is it just to get rid of old weapons? Or is the oil in Kuweit getting empty and now u need to suck out Iraq, or maybe because daddy didnt finish the job, so the little son gets the chance to play in the sandbox too? Or even better, U have new weapons - time to test them...

Even more reason to get rid of him. He's using the money he is getting to build up his Army and to increase his personal wealth. All he has to do is agree to the UN sanctions and inspections. Did you know the US buys a million barrels a day from Iraq.

Daddy did the job he said he was going to do. There's plenty of oil in Kuwait. Yes GW does play in the sand box but unlike you he knows not to eat those smelly lumps he finds. We have tested all our new weapons in Afghanistan. Thanks for playing.




BTW- I checked the "want more reasons" block.

 

[MomAndSkoorbaby]

Hmmmm.....upon further thought, I have decided that I am undecided! I don't really know enough to make an informed decision on that one.