<< Interesting poll, but I don't agree with your premise. The boycott may not have huge significance, but it will make at least a small difference. What can you ever really do beyond individual resistance to something to change the world? You can try to change other people's opinions as well, but it won't matter unless people act on those opinions. People will not act on the opinions you preach unless you act on those opinions as well. Thus the individual boycott is a small but fundamental step on the ladder to social change. How effective would recycling be now if 15 years ago everyone decided it wasn't really worthwhile because so many people other than themselves will still throw everything away? It would have failed miserably. Once you realize a certain course of action is right, you must act on it if there is to be any hope. Gandhi said "We must be the change we wish to see in the world." >>
I can see that side, but it seems that no matter how much preaching you do people, the masses need to be entertained, and movies are one of the best ways to do it. Most people don't care about region codes and everything else that the particular boycotters are protesting against, and a few people not seeing the movies only ammounts to a few thousand dollars (pulling number out of my ass, don't hold me to it). That few people protesting is so far under the radar that the execs most definitely do not notice at all. Plus it looks like the majority of these people aren't doing much more than just boycotting the movies. I don't think I've heard one person say they've notified the MPAA at all of what they are doing.