Originally posted by: sandorski
Originally posted by: corky-g
Have had both - Intel is more stable than AM in most applications that I use. My criterion is stability - period! A crashed speed burner is useless.
BS
i agree.
Originally posted by: sandorski
Originally posted by: corky-g
Have had both - Intel is more stable than AM in most applications that I use. My criterion is stability - period! A crashed speed burner is useless.
BS
Originally posted by: corky-g
Have had both - Intel is more stable than AM in most applications that I use. My criterion is stability - period! A crashed speed burner is useless.
Originally posted by: txxxx
The intel needs dual channel memory to perform well, so its AMD for now.
Originally posted by: Mik3y
Originally posted by: txxxx
The intel needs dual channel memory to perform well, so its AMD for now.
i dont know wut you mean by well, but are u saying that a p4 3.2C without dual channel will perform better then a P4 2.8C with dual channel? as we all know, the 2.8C with 800 MHz fsb and dual channel owns a barton at 2.2GHz, so i clearly dont see how you expect a barton at 2.1 to surpass a 3.2C in performance. yes, dual channel helps intel, but dual channel only benefits intel 15% more in memory performance then single channel, not 15% is system performance.