Both of these tests yield an I.Q. score that expresses an individual's intelligence compared with a representative group of people of the same age, with the average IQ set at 100. For example, if a 14-year-old does as well as the average 16-year-old, he earns a mental age of 16. This is divided by the child's chronological age (14) and multiplied by 100 to arrive at the IQ score. In this case, the child's I.Q. is an above-average 114 (16/14*100=114).
Originally posted by: godmare
Then don't vote.
You know, incidentally, perhaps you'd be kind enough to provide us with a link to the original post?
Originally posted by: Demon-Xanth
Eleventy Billion.
Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
I don't care. IQs are like benchmarks, they are basically useless in real world tests.
Originally posted by: vi_edit
42