Originally posted by: LeeTJ
Originally posted by: glugglug
Actually whites are one of the the most discriminated against groups. Not on a personal level but on a systematic level.
Most large employers have "equal opportunity" employment rules which means that the proportions of hiree races has to be the same as the proportion in the general population. Which means if others in your group tend to work for their jobs you are SOL. I know my mom was turned down for a lot of teaching jobs because she was white, and sometimes people are even upfront about the fact that a black or hispanic with the same qualifications would get the job easily, but they can't hire any whites because of ratios that have to be kept.
In some fields Indians and or Asians may be discriminated against more than whites for similar reasons to the above.
how stupid.
you said equally qualified. IF they are equally qualified it is ONLY right that you keep the ratios consistent with the population at large. THAT IS NOT DISCRIMINATION.
your reply to this is so retarded it's unbelievable. equal opportunity means hiring somebody with the qualifications regardless of race/gender/sexual orientation/whatever. you don't hire based on the ratio of racial representation in the office and whether or not it accurately reflects the demographics of society. "equal opportunity", ie affirmative action, is not this. THAT IS DISCRIMINATION. if some black guy is completely qualified for a job, but the workplace where he's applying a job for has had its "quota" of black people already hired, then he shouldn't be hired???? uh...right, according to your logic, because the workplace doesn't represent the demographic makeup of society, the black person doesn't get the job. geez.
Originally posted by: DaveSimmons
Originally posted by: Syringer
Hmm, will the people that made whites #1 on the poll explain themselves?
One difference between straight whites and every other racial / ethnic / sexual group is that white males are the one group that it is
acceptable to bash and (through affirmative action, scholarships, etc.) discriminate against.
The 99.9% of the white population that are working class and not terribly affluent are lumped in with the 0.1% mostly-white super-rich who do control the corporations and familiy fortunes. Your ancestors might have been enslaved, but mine were kept in grinding poverty as "indentured servants" and tenant farmers by some of the same rich oppressors.
I personally do believe in scholarships to give more people a chance at "the pursuit of happiness," but think most of them should be based on economic need / poverty rather than race. And I do accept the need for some forms of affirmative action to make up for the lack of equal access to education and to help overcome the legacy of all the friends of Trent Lott that still make up the top management at most corporations (and pack the house and senate).
scholarships are money people give away willingly for free. they should be able to decide whoever they want to give away their money to. if i wanna give my money away only to hispanic female engineers, i should be entitled to. it's my money. i should be able to do what i want with it. i don't see the problem with minority groups giving specific scholarships to people of the same ethnicity.
and i don't agree with your affirmative action post. access to higher education is there for people who are willing to take the next step and do the hard work. i know plenty of asian families that come here with absolutely nothing and the second generation are already in some of the top schools in the nation. it's called hard work. if anything, outreach programs conveying the importance of a higher education need to be increased. but if a person doesn't make it on pure qualifications, then i don't believe they deserve entrance into that school. my hispanic friend got into princeton, and he knew it wasn't on his grades. he felt extremely insulted by this and went to berkeley instead.
Originally posted by: Moralpanic
Originally posted by: Syringer
Hmm, will the people that made whites #1 on the poll explain themselves?
I think a better explanation would be that those who voted for white, are failures in real life, and it's easier to be a victim than to take responsibility.
i think anybody who thinks they're a victim in life are failures in real life.
Originally posted by: Gr1mL0cK
The results of this poll is absolutely f*cking disgusting. I can't believe it. THE most? Oh my f*ckin gawd!
considering that most of the people here are white (pure demographics), and that most ethnicities vote for themselves as being oppressed, it's not really that amazing to believe. i mean, look at it this way. atot is OVERWHELMINGLY male, yet how many voted for women? i rest my case.
Originally posted by: Gr1mL0cK
Originally posted by: Maetryx
First, no one implied that there is tons of discrimination out there just because they voted in the poll. The question was asked, and some people selected "whites" as the most discriminated againt. The shrill reaction to the poll is kind of amusing. The knee jerk shouting of "ignorance" is typical. If there were 10 cases against white, and 5 cases against some minority group, the happy news is that there isn't that much going on. But the poll result would still say "whites" are the "most" discriminated against.
In fact I voted "whites", but I was also considering "gays". One reason I chose "white" is because if I were a black female with my identical credentials (engineering degree, 10 years of experience) then I would be a particularly hot commodity due to the undeniable skewing affect of the affirmative action culture. As it is, I'm a white male and I am a regular commodity.
My sister-in-law (white) ended up going to medical school overseas because she could not get into a med school with her good credentials. If she were a racial minority, she could have selected any medical school in this country (United States).
So don't panic when white people select "white" on this poll. White people are tired of being the neutral background in which non-whites congregate into racial special interest groups. The poll results aren't the result of ignorance. It ought to embarass the shouters of racial status quo that they have to resort immediately to name calling.
Right, that 1% of the minorities that are benefiting from affirmative action is really detracting your opportunites. Oh noooooo!!!
"Today 1 in 4 Americans is either Black, Hispanic, or Native American; however in medical school these groups comprise only:
· 1 in 10 medical students,
· 3 in 100 faculty members, and
· 1 in 100 full professors. "
I'm sure its because white people are just smarter and harder working though. You know, they take personal responsibility the most and all. I'm sure your sister didn't get into med school because of that minority that stole her position, not because she just didn't get beat out.
It's funny how you place the blame on minorities such as black, instead of looking to solve to the problem of the rich, white people who you say is not respresentative of you.
if you don't think it's because those people are harder working, then you need to wisen up. at my school, the ee/cs/ce engineers are overwhelmingly non-white. mostly asian and indian. but i guess it's not because of the hard work they put into the school. or the time they take to study their major. oh no. it must be because they're discrimanatory against white folk. please. maybe it's because they have a harder work ethic than most people, whether or not it's something engrained in their culture.
Originally posted by: Maetryx
1) I don't think there is much discimination going on in this country to anyone.
2) I am not (nor did I claim to be) a victim.
3) The fact remains that if I am a black female (all else being equal) I would have an even greater marketability than I already enjoy as an engineer with 10 years experience. Since there isn't much discrimination going on, this is an example of a type that is occuring: artificial value placed on non-whiteness and non-maleness
um...no. there's plenty of racism in this country against all ethnicities. i however believe that hard work in all cases will overcome this hurdle for anybody. although since i don't know all the circumstances surround your sister, i won't comment on it. i don't think much racism is going on compared to a decade or two ago. if you apply yourself to what you want to do and truly work for it, i don't think anything is impossible for that person to attain. and the people that don't want to apply themselves and want to be victocrats and blame the system or the -isms will always remain on the lower rung. the fact that many people i know who are not so unbelievable have pulled themselves up by the bootstraps regardless of race and have moved up in society is proof enough to me.
Originally posted by: Moralpanic
Magically, it would seem, Asians, Jews, West Indies blacks are immune to this institutional racism.
You have got to be kidding? It does happen. Have you looked at the hospitals or engineering companies and seeing what the proportion of asians are? Then look at management and up, and what are the numbers like up there?
i have. most top execs are white. now, how many asians/indians/etc... do you know that were business majors, got an mba, etc... most asians that i know of are pursuing something in the sciences. same with indian. now, just because there's an overwhelming number of a couple of ethinicities in a job occupation doesn't mean jack. otherwise engineering would be construed as racist against whites, which it isn't. however, when the overwhelming majority for an occupation is white, it must be racist. white = minority implies no racism. white = majority implies racism. hmmm, this logic sounds kind of skewed.
i'm about on page 2 of this thread that has spiraled towards meaningless chatter as the victocrats come out of the woodwork. i can't believe some of the opinions in this poll. especially those of victocrats.