POLL: What E-Mail Program/Client do you use?

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

MotionMan

Lifer
Jan 11, 2006
17,124
12
81
Originally posted by: Captante
Originally posted by: MotionMan
Originally posted by: TheGizmo
gmail needs to be an option

Gmail is an e-mail service provider, not a Windows e-mail program/client (as far as I know). For example, I use my Windows e-mail program/client to get my Gmail.

MotionMan


How aboutt adding web-based mail to the poll instead of just Gmail?

Because I am not interested in web-based e-mail, just Windows-based.

MotionMan
 

Kelemvor

Lifer
May 23, 2002
16,928
8
81
Gmail is all I use. No reason to use a client at all. WHy use something limited to a specific PC when Gmail is available from everywhere. I do use Outlooka t work but don't have a choice.
 

MotionMan

Lifer
Jan 11, 2006
17,124
12
81
Originally posted by: aphex
Originally posted by: MotionMan
Originally posted by: aphex
Originally posted by: MotionMan
Originally posted by: aphex
you forgot 'Mail'

You mean "Windows Mail"? It's in there.

MotionMan

No, as in OSX Mail.

Originally posted by: MotionMan

(I know it is a Windows-centric poll. That is on purpose)

MotionMan

Well if your going to get all technical about our reading comprehension, might as well try posting in the correct forum next time...

Do they have better reading comprehension in other forums? ;)

MotionMan
 

GeekDrew

Diamond Member
Jun 7, 2000
9,099
19
81
I posted a message to a newsgroup about a month ago that accurately describes my position on email:

Re: Is Penelope Still alive ? was Cramming Eudora users into Thunderbird
on Wed, 11 Apr 2007 02:05:35 +0100

>I used to think that Web mail was just because the average computer user
>was not computer literate enough to set up POP e-mail. Now I think
>otherwise since my very computer literate friends prefer web mail as well.

Email, as a whole, bothers me. I don't think that there is any approach that
will support everyone's needs. It took me quite some time to come to the
method that I'm currently using, but it works very well for me.

I have an IMAP mail account with Fastmail.FM. No, I don't work for them, nor
do I intend this to be an advertisement for them -- I only mention them
because their service works very well for me, and I strongly recommend them
to anyone needing such services. Their service has a very well developed
web-based mail interface, that is both easy to use, and is very powerful (I
will admit that the first week or two I had it, I strongly disliked the
interface, but it grew on me, quickly). When I'm at work or on a computer on
which my preferred mail client is not installed, I log into the web interface,
and use that.

When I get home (well, in my case, to the house of the nearest neighbor with a
decent internet connection), I launch Thunderbird, and it downloads all
messages to its mail store. Thus, the mail on the IMAP server is synchronized
with the mail in Thunderbird. I can then use Thunderbird while connected to
the mail server, which allows mail to automatically be downloaded into
Thunderbird, while also remaining on the IMAP server, or I can use Thunderbird
in disconnected mode, which allows me to have access to all of my email,
without needing a connection to the IMAP server (it uses the locally cached
mailbox).

As for legacy email: I had been using POP since the mid-90s, and had thousands
and thousands of messages that I had already migrated to Thunderbird, before I
decided that I needed a more portable solution. Adding my IMAP mail account to
Thunderbird was just the trick -- I was able to just click and drag folders
full of mail onto the IMAP account, and then just sit and wait a little while,
during which time Thunderbird uploaded the messages to the server. I now have
all of my legacy email in the IMAP account, so I can access them with
Thunderbird or via the web interface.

Some people incorrectly believe that IMAP does not support nested folders --
that is incorrect. Some mail servers do not, but that is not an IMAP
limitation. The IMAP service I use allows nested folders, and server-side
rules (that are very easy to configure, or the user can use the "advanced"
configuration mode) that allow mail to be automatically put into any IMAP
folder -- where it will then be available via any connection to that account,
be it a web interface, or via a mail client.

I used to be a die-hard advocate for POP accounts, but after I truly gave IMAP
a chance, the only thing I see in POP is how limited it is.

I apologize for how much I jumped around between topics in this message, but I
hope that someone finds at least a little bit of it helpful.

In short, my favorite mail client is Thunderbird, followed by Outlook, followed by the FastMail.FM web interface (that I usually use).
 

MotionMan

Lifer
Jan 11, 2006
17,124
12
81
Originally posted by: Parasitic
I've never even heard 2/3 of those programs listed in poll.

Neither had I. I did research and tried to be thorough.

MotionMan
 

MotionMan

Lifer
Jan 11, 2006
17,124
12
81
Still no love for Eudora?

I used Eudora from about 1993 until about a week ago. I just switched to Thunderbird because of IMAP issues.

MotionMan
 

MotionMan

Lifer
Jan 11, 2006
17,124
12
81
Originally posted by: doggyfromplanetwoof
Ever since Gmail came out, this poll has been obsolete.

How do you figure? For example, my work e-mail is hosted by my employer. I have to use Windows, I cannot access it via a web interface and I cannot forward it to Gmail. I can, however, select the Windows e-mail program/client.

No Gmail for me (and most other people who use e-mail for work).

MotionMan
 

corkyg

Elite Member | Peripherals
Super Moderator
Mar 4, 2000
27,370
240
106
I receive mail in Eudora Pro. It has really good mail management tools. I send mail in Outlook Express - can't find another that will send embedded animated GIFs, photos, and .MID sound. T-Bird won't - G-Mail won't - Eudora won't.
 

KAZANI

Senior member
Sep 10, 2006
527
0
0
Thunderbird, because it's the only Outlook alternative I have tried which decently supports unicode.