Originally posted by: EatSpam
Aren't all those options pretty much the same?
Money is absorbed in "administrative" costs.
Politicians don't listen/care.
Nothing to pray to/praying solves nothing.
All the same as doing nothing.
So option 4 it is for me - less effort, same end result!
Originally posted by: jackschmittusa
I'm all for fixing our country first. Too much needs to be done here to be distracted by far away things that have little or no effect on us. If that earns me a "cold and callus" label, so be it. If we don't help ourselves soon, we will not be in a position to help anybody else in the near future.
Originally posted by: jackschmittusa
I'm all for fixing our country first. Too much needs to be done here to be distracted by far away things that have little or no effect on us. If that earns me a "cold and callus" label, so be it. If we don't help ourselves soon, we will not be in a position to help anybody else in the near future.
Originally posted by: eits
Originally posted by: jackschmittusa
I'm all for fixing our country first. Too much needs to be done here to be distracted by far away things that have little or no effect on us. If that earns me a "cold and callus" label, so be it. If we don't help ourselves soon, we will not be in a position to help anybody else in the near future.
very good argument.
Originally posted by: BlinderBomber
What am I doing? I help run http://www.standnow.org , I wish a lot more people would get involved. And to those who say we should fix our own country - are you serious? Do you not understand that this a genocide, where nearly 400,000 people have died and over 2 million are displaced? The government of Sudan is using attack helicopters, planes, and machine guns on its own civilians and you want the United States, supposedly the country that upholds freedom throughout the world, to turn a blind eye?
Here is a bunch more pictures taken from the region - http://www.ushmm.org/conscience/alert/darfur/steidle/
This is government sponsored genocide and you are turning your back? Shame on you and any morality you claim to have.
Originally posted by: Ronstang
The sad fact is that region currently is of no economical importance to the US so we are not going to do anything about it and I support that view.
Since 2001, the Bush administration?s priority in Sudan has been to end the more than two-decade-long war between the southern-based Sudan People?s Liberation Movement (S.P.L.M.) and the Arab-chauvinist rulers in Khartoum. The resulting ?stability? in Sudan would allow Washington to lift existing sanctions and permit U.S. oil corporations to return to southern Sudan.
Originally posted by: Ronstang
Originally posted by: BlinderBomber
What am I doing? I help run http://www.standnow.org , I wish a lot more people would get involved. And to those who say we should fix our own country - are you serious? Do you not understand that this a genocide, where nearly 400,000 people have died and over 2 million are displaced? The government of Sudan is using attack helicopters, planes, and machine guns on its own civilians and you want the United States, supposedly the country that upholds freedom throughout the world, to turn a blind eye?
Here is a bunch more pictures taken from the region - http://www.ushmm.org/conscience/alert/darfur/steidle/
This is government sponsored genocide and you are turning your back? Shame on you and any morality you claim to have.
Blah, not my problem and don't try to use guilt like you are to make me feel any different. It has nothing to do with shame on me or anyone else who simply doesn't care. We can't save the world when it doesn't want to be saved. This has nothing to do with morality or lack thereof. We didn't cause the problem so why should we fix it? The sad fact is that region currently is of no economical importance to the US so we are not going to do anything about it and I support that view. If it bothers you so much then you need to donate more of YOUR money rather then trying to guilt people into helping.
Originally posted by: Orignal Earl
Originally posted by: Ronstang
The sad fact is that region currently is of no economical importance to the US so we are not going to do anything about it and I support that view.
What do you mean? Thar be oil there
Since 2001, the Bush administration?s priority in Sudan has been to end the more than two-decade-long war between the southern-based Sudan People?s Liberation Movement (S.P.L.M.) and the Arab-chauvinist rulers in Khartoum. The resulting ?stability? in Sudan would allow Washington to lift existing sanctions and permit U.S. oil corporations to return to southern Sudan.
Sudan: Western Oil Greed Trumps ?Genocide? Concerns
Originally posted by: eits
what are you doing?
Originally posted by: daniel49
Same thing the UN is nothing.
That being said if there is anything at all that the UN should be able to be useful for, it would be something like this.
But once again it is proving how inept it is.
The United Nations plans to cut individual food rations to six million people sheltering from violence in Sudan by half, saying it cannot afford to give them all a proper daily ration.Citing "donor fatigue," Christiane Berthiaume, a spokeswoman for the UN's World Food Program (WFP), said her agency was cutting daily rations to an average of just 1,050 calories per person, half a normal daily diet tally of 2,100.
"This is one of the hardest decisions I have ever made," said WFP chief James Morris. "Haven't the people of Darfur suffered enough?"
Canada is among the countries which have slashed funding for emergency food aid in Sudan. Last year, it gave over $20 million. This year the figure is just over $5 million.
Liberal and Conservative MPs have been calling for more aid to Darfur.
The U.S. has been the largest donor so far, giving $188 million US, Reuters said. U.S. President George W. Bush is expected to meet with Darfur advocates Friday afternoon.
Originally posted by: tommywishbone
They ain't got no oil... they don't get no democracy. Sorry.