another vote for PowerDVD 2.5, i have alsoused just about every other player out there too and most of them rank closely together but IMO, powerDVD pulls slightly ahead
WinDVD does not have better image quality, at least compared to PowerDVD3. PDVD3's colors are richer. WinDVD downmixes 5.1 to 4.1 better than PowerDVD though.
Personally I use WinDVD 2000 2.3 since I have 4 channel speakers.
Kami,
I'm not convinced that PowerDVD is better than Cinemaster based DVD programs like the ATI DVD player that came with my ATI Rage Pro card. I don't know about WinDVD but I'd say that Cinemaster and PowerDVD are the two top ones.
windvd 2000 2.3 DOES have better image/sound quality then powerdvd 3.0. I have both, and while powerdvd does almost catch up, it doesn't quite make it. It still doesn't decode the lfe channel. The reviews at digital-digest.com back me up: )
<< I'm not convinced that PowerDVD is better than Cinemaster based DVD programs like the ATI DVD player that came with my ATI Rage Pro card. I don't know about WinDVD but I'd say that Cinemaster and PowerDVD are the two top ones. >>
The Cinemaster engine used to be the best...and I used to use the ATI player but the latest versions of PowerDVD and WinDVD are leaps and bounds ahead of cinemaster, IMO.
Is there any other place to buy windvd multichannel 2.3 other than intervideo's website. 50 bucks for a software player is insane!!! I think that is why so many people just used hacked versions of windvd.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.