- Feb 6, 2002
- 36,592
- 28,666
- 136
Because of Roe being eliminated the court feels threatened and they want an additional 6m for security enhancements. We know the court currently has an ethics problem both real and perceived. Federal judges have ethics laws/rues they must follow but SCOTUS is exempt. We currently don't have a way require that of SCOTUS. Senate will not allow a change in the law.
Is this a good time for a bargain? You get your 6m if, 1) Agree to be subject to the same laws/rules as all other federal judges. 2) Allow the FBI to fully investigate the leak of Roe including putting justices under oath for depositions.
I get accused of creating polls that score 100%. I don't think that will happen here. Curious what the majority think.
Supreme Court asks Congress for more security money due to threats | CNN Politics
Is this a good time for a bargain? You get your 6m if, 1) Agree to be subject to the same laws/rules as all other federal judges. 2) Allow the FBI to fully investigate the leak of Roe including putting justices under oath for depositions.
I get accused of creating polls that score 100%. I don't think that will happen here. Curious what the majority think.
Supreme Court asks Congress for more security money due to threats | CNN Politics