KarenMarie
Elite Member
- Sep 20, 2003
- 14,372
- 6
- 81
I think it is real... not because I know anything about cars and weight loads or anything, but because I do know that some people are stupid enough to do stuff like this.
KarenMarie
Originally posted by: Lifer
that pic looks so fake. i dont' care what that site sez.
first of all, the rear fender looks photoshopped (though i don't see a reason why if you're just trying to tuck the wheel under the wheel well).
second of all, with all the weight, so little rope tying it down, and at that angle the load is on, the lumber will come flying off at any low speed.
thirdly, if you look closely at front and then the rear, it looks like the rear is sloped inwards. hard to explain, but if you picture the car from above, it looks like an upside down trapezoid.
Originally posted by: glugglug
Fake for MANY reasons:
1. Where is the back tire. Even if it had blown, it would still be attached to the rim.
2. The load is supposedly "only" 3k pounds (actually looks like a lot less to me). While not good for such a small vehicle, it would not cause the problems that they are claiming, except maybe if you try to corner fast (as in pull like 0.75g or more) while carrying that load, meaning they clearly would have made it out of the parking lot.
3. I see no driver or passenger in the pic. The steam in the exhaust suggests the car was started only seconds before the pic was taken, which to me indicates the person who started the car took the pic (and the car was most likely left there from an old wreck and had the tire stolen).
4. If the wood really did weigh 2200 lbs, it wouldn't stay on the roof at that kind of an angle held by "twine".
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: glugglug
Fake for MANY reasons:
1. Where is the back tire. Even if it had blown, it would still be attached to the rim.
2. The load is supposedly "only" 3k pounds (actually looks like a lot less to me). While not good for such a small vehicle, it would not cause the problems that they are claiming, except maybe if you try to corner fast (as in pull like 0.75g or more) while carrying that load, meaning they clearly would have made it out of the parking lot.
3. I see no driver or passenger in the pic. The steam in the exhaust suggests the car was started only seconds before the pic was taken, which to me indicates the person who started the car took the pic (and the car was most likely left there from an old wreck and had the tire stolen).
4. If the wood really did weigh 2200 lbs, it wouldn't stay on the roof at that kind of an angle held by "twine".
Then explain why there are MANY other pics from MANY other angles at Snopes?
Originally posted by: Amused
I was going to post this. Yeah, I was amazed to find out it was real too. :Q
These threads never fail to crack me up. Some people are clearly blind or just completely detached from any perception of reality.damn is everybody a photoshop expert???
Originally posted by: tcsenter
These threads never fail to crack me up. Some people are clearly blind or just completely detached from any perception of reality.damn is everybody a photoshop expert???
A 'sleeping' occupant is easily seen in the front seat on any of those photos. Yet coke-bottle eye glass boy says he can see no one in the car. Time for double coke-bottle correction lenses, I guess.
There is nothing inconsistent about the photo and what it appears to be depicting. 'Um, the fender didn't crinkle the way it would have if that was real.'
WTF? Where does one go to get his training in Jetta-Fender-Crinkle-ology? lmao!
Dude, I'm all over that. What do you think certificated Crinkle-ologists make a year? I bet they pull down hella cash, yo!You send in three proofs of purchase after watching "The Fast And The Furious" one hundred times, and 4-6 weeks later, you get a certificate in the mail.
Originally posted by: ShotgunSteve
Originally posted by: tcsenter
These threads never fail to crack me up. Some people are clearly blind or just completely detached from any perception of reality.damn is everybody a photoshop expert???
A 'sleeping' occupant is easily seen in the front seat on any of those photos. Yet coke-bottle eye glass boy says he can see no one in the car. Time for double coke-bottle correction lenses, I guess.
There is nothing inconsistent about the photo and what it appears to be depicting. 'Um, the fender didn't crinkle the way it would have if that was real.'
WTF? Where does one go to get his training in Jetta-Fender-Crinkle-ology? lmao!
You send in three proofs of purchase after watching "The Fast And The Furious" one hundred times, and 4-6 weeks later, you get a certificate in the mail.![]()
Originally posted by: tcsenter
Dude, I'm all over that. What do you think certificated Crinkle-ologists make a year? I bet they pull down hella cash, yo!You send in three proofs of purchase after watching "The Fast And The Furious" one hundred times, and 4-6 weeks later, you get a certificate in the mail.![]()
Originally posted by: glugglug
Fake for MANY reasons:
1. Where is the back tire. Even if it had blown, it would still be attached to the rim.
2. The load is supposedly "only" 3k pounds (actually looks like a lot less to me). While not good for such a small vehicle, it would not cause the problems that they are claiming, except maybe if you try to corner fast (as in pull like 0.75g or more) while carrying that load, meaning they clearly would have made it out of the parking lot.
3. I see no driver or passenger in the pic. The steam in the exhaust suggests the car was started only seconds before the pic was taken, which to me indicates the person who started the car took the pic (and the car was most likely left there from an old wreck and had the tire stolen).
4. If the wood really did weigh 2200 lbs, it wouldn't stay on the roof at that kind of an angle held by "twine".
Go join the strike force, I'm sure some one will listen.Originally posted by: ShotgunSteve
I dunno, dawg, but I bet it's a lot. I put in three applications after I got my certificate, but for some reason they always have to run out of the room when they get to the part about my expected salary.Originally posted by: tcsenterDude, I'm all over that. What do you think certificated Crinkle-ologists make a year? I bet they pull down hella cash, yo!You send in three proofs of purchase after watching "The Fast And The Furious" one hundred times, and 4-6 weeks later, you get a certificate in the mail.![]()
![]()
Originally posted by: DrPizza
So far, there's 34 idiots who believe the image is fake without skimming through the rest of the thread to find out it's real...
