ElTorrente
Banned
- Aug 16, 2005
- 483
- 0
- 0
Originally posted by: Some1ne
...If you are willing to spend the money on good equipment. My setup is absolutely nuts doing anything that involves disk access. Loading levels in BF2, for instance, is hilarious. I am in game sooooo long all by myself every single time a map changes, that I can cap a flag before the second guy makes it in-game - then slooooowly the other 63 people start filtering in.
While I'm sure your RAID is helping here, this also has a lot to do with the fact that you also have a top of the line CPU (overclocked no less), more RAM than most (also overclocked), and what is in general a very top of the line system. You would still be hitting the level first even if you had BF2 installed on a plain drive, because very few people have systems that are even remotely comparable to yours. I do agree that RAID adds at least some performance, in gaming and in everything else that is heavily reliant on disk accesses, but loading a level in a game is also very CPU and memory intensive, and your performance can't be entirely attributed to the RAID array.
I agree with you on all of those things.
The fact is though, that on a typical 64 person server, night in and night out, there is gonna be at least a few people that will have faster processers and ram than me. They may even have a Raid0 setup with a couple disks. Why doesn't anyone, EVER, beat me into a level? Because of my Raid0, in addition to a very powerful machine.
I remember a few nights ago I was shocked because some guy got into the game after a level change about 5 seconds after me - and I thought it was amazing.
You're right about the levels being cpu intensive, though. It certainly helps to have my x2 running so fast.