Poll: Questions about this forum

Are the majority posts in this forum generally based on....

  • Emotion

  • Reason


Results are only viewable after voting.

hellod9

Senior member
Sep 16, 2007
249
0
0
Please answer the question to the best of your knowledge.
 
Last edited:

boomerang

Lifer
Jun 19, 2000
18,883
641
126
My feeling on this is that it's reasonable to assume that emotion may play a part.
 

bamacre

Lifer
Jul 1, 2004
21,029
2
81
Agree wholeheartedly. The same is true for the person that posted below you as well.

Oh, that's not emotion, that's just madness. He's been inflicted with hate, he has become what he fears. Misery loves company, and he's obviously a lonely man.
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,824
6,372
126
Both, but try to keep to the side of Reason. Unavoidable when discussing these types of issues.
 

trenchfoot

Lifer
Aug 5, 2000
15,987
8,584
136
Attempts at being honest while being true to one's emotions creates the most hilarious posts this side of Mars.

That's why I read so many posts in here where the posters are very angry but they don't know why. :D


edit - Including me........i think.
 
Last edited:

Atreus21

Lifer
Aug 21, 2007
12,001
571
126
I'm not sure I'd call what happens here emotion vs. reason, but rather ego vs. reason.

I think that the sentiments that guide people's actions in political discussions are essentially the same as those that guide people's actions in football games. You hate the other team and love yours. You will denigrate the other team no matter what, and support yours no matter what.

Only very extreme circumstances, such as if our side committed genocide, would shake our faith sufficiently to condemn our own team.

That's why people excuse their team for being racist, yet condemn the other for the same action. It's not hypocrisy, it's ego.
 

trenchfoot

Lifer
Aug 5, 2000
15,987
8,584
136
I'm not sure I'd call what happens here emotion vs. reason, but rather ego vs. reason.

I think that the sentiments that guide people's actions in political discussions are essentially the same as those that guide people's actions in football games. You hate the other team and love yours. You will denigrate the other team no matter what, and support yours no matter what.

Only very extreme circumstances, such as if our side committed genocide, would shake our faith sufficiently to condemn our own team.

That's why people excuse their team for being racist, yet condemn the other for the same action. It's not hypocrisy, it's ego.


Makes sense to me.:thumbsup: However, I'd like to add in a healthy heaping helping of MSNBC and FOX to the recipe to add some "BAM!" to it.
 

spacejamz

Lifer
Mar 31, 2003
10,985
1,708
126
^^ Idiocy. Now, prove your point, you can't, you can just post idiocy.

Why do I need to prove it? You do a damn good job showing your leanings all on your own, but as I have previously mentioned, you are so blinded by your hate and anger, you don't see it.
 

Corn

Diamond Member
Nov 12, 1999
6,390
29
91
You say wrong - and idiotic - things you can't back up. Nice of you to confess it.

LOL silly, silly Craig. All one has to do is search for "save234" to see you are nothing but a walking, talking, ideological propaganda machine. There is plenty of idiocy here in the sea of stupidity known as ATPN, your portion is about the size of Lake Erie.