POLL: o'reilly, limbaugh

[Carbo]

Originally posted by: LeeTJ
so can we conclude that there is a liberal bias here at AT?? why does it always read like there is a conservative bias??

is it that more liberals are lurkers and more conservatives post more?

It's because most liberals are intellectual phonies who can neither spell, nor write, nor think for themselves. They can't put forth an opinion until they are told what to think by their grand leader.
By the way, who is that these days?
Ted Kennedy? Puleeze. He's a bloated dinosaur with a glass of Chivas in his paws.
Mario Cuomo? What ever happened to the Great Savior?
That leaves Al Sharpton. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!

 

[outriding]

Originally posted by: Carbo

Originally posted by: LeeTJ
so can we conclude that there is a liberal bias here at AT?? why does it always read like there is a conservative bias??

is it that more liberals are lurkers and more conservatives post more?

It's because most liberals are intellectual phonies who can neither spell, nor write, nor think for themselves. They can't put forth an opinion until they are told what to think by their grand leader.
By the way, who is that these days?
Ted Kennedy? Puleeze. He's a bloated dinosaur with a glass of Chivas in his paws.
Mario Cuomo? What ever happened to the Great Savior?
That leaves Al Sharpton. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!

i dont understand if reps. are soo smart why cant "W" say Nuclear ?

you probably never heard of the Heritage foundation and all the things it does.

typical rep... totaly clueless

 

[Mrburns2007]

The big problem I have with Limbaugh is that he complains about the Democrats demonizing people and then turns around and does it himself. With Clinton he continuly droned on about how Clinton attitude was "what can we get away with today". He tried to create this picture that Clinton was a criminal, I disagreed with a lot of Clinton's agenda but he was no more a criminal then any other President that we have had.

The other strike Limbaugh has is that he has the image of a FatCat. The rich fat guy smoking the cigar. He drones on about discipline and responsiblity meanwhile he's stuffing his face with twinkies and smoking big cigars.

See that I can think for myself !!!!!!!!






BTW: He's no mouthpiece for the Repubs and he doesn't tell "them" what to do, you bloody liberals can't make up your mind. There seperate entities, I know that concept is hard to grasp.

 

[Spamela]

Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Limpbrow, the fatmanazi, is a showman who makes his living stimmulating the testosterne levels of morons.

O'Reilly has a bad case of moral outrage because he's operating our of a sense of justice. He can still stimulate morons, I guess, because I very often agree with him.

he's not fat anymore, so "crypto fascist" might be a better description.

 

[fluxquantum]

i am not too fond of either but i would listen to o'reilly over limbaugh any day

 

[Damage]

Originally posted by: Drekce
You forgot Sean Hannity. He is great to listen to.

Yep!

 

[Damage]

Originally posted by: ParStyles
Now, what about Michael Savage? Anybody listen and like his radio show?

Yep.. He really gets off on a rant sometimes! heheh..

Also try Larry Elder.. He's a black libertarian so left wingers really hate him..

 

[Carbo]

outriding, you are out to lunch, too. Your gibberish makes no sense. The Heritage Foundation is a conservative "think tank", (sheesh, I hate that term, btw). What the hell are you talking about "W" saying "nuclear". Shouldn't drink in the afternoon.
Mr. Burns, Clinton is a criminal. He was disbarred for criminal activities, in fact. And as for Rush's image of a Fat Cat, ain't nothing wrong with being successful and enjoying it. Unless you're a hand wringing, guilt wracked liberal who frets over the fact that not everyone is equally wealthy.

 

[Damage]

Originally posted by: Mrburns2007
The big problem I have with Limbaugh is that he complains about the Democrats demonizing people and then turns around and does it himself. With Clinton he continuly droned on about how Clinton attitude was "what can we get away with today". He tried to create this picture that Clinton was a criminal, I disagreed with a lot of Clinton's agenda but he was no more a criminal then any other President that we have had.

The other strike Limbaugh has is that he has the image of a FatCat. The rich fat guy smoking the cigar. He drones on about discipline and responsiblity meanwhile he's stuffing his face with twinkies and smoking big cigars.

See that I can think for myself !!!!!!!!


BTW: He's no mouthpiece for the Repubs and he doesn't tell "them" what to do, you bloody liberals can't make up your mind. There seperate entities, I know that concept is hard to grasp.

On "Clinton bashing"

Try,

High Crimes and Misdemeanors: The Case Against Bill Clinton

The Final Days: The Last, Desperate Abuses of Power by the Clinton White House

There's a reason.. IMHO he should let it go, but Clinton keeps poking his head up and making stupid comments.

 

[BatmanNate]

I've never listened to O'reilly, but I'm still waiting on Limbaugh to get hit by a bus.

 

[AvesPKS]

Originally posted by: Carbo
outriding, you are out to lunch, too. Your gibberish makes no sense. The Heritage Foundation is a conservative "think tank", (sheesh, I hate that term, btw). What the hell are you talking about "W" saying "nuclear". Shouldn't drink in the afternoon.
Mr. Burns, Clinton is a criminal. He was disbarred for criminal activities, in fact. And as for Rush's image of a Fat Cat, ain't nothing wrong with being successful and enjoying it. Unless you're a hand wringing, guilt wracked liberal who frets over the fact that not everyone is equally wealthy.

G. Gordon Liddy is a convicted felon. That does not change the fact that I agree with some of his viewpoints.

And where does this Hannity fellow broadcast out of? I am interested in becoming acquainted with his viewpoints as well.

 

[Damage]

Originally posted by: AvesPKS

Originally posted by: Carbo
outriding, you are out to lunch, too. Your gibberish makes no sense. The Heritage Foundation is a conservative "think tank", (sheesh, I hate that term, btw). What the hell are you talking about "W" saying "nuclear". Shouldn't drink in the afternoon.
Mr. Burns, Clinton is a criminal. He was disbarred for criminal activities, in fact. And as for Rush's image of a Fat Cat, ain't nothing wrong with being successful and enjoying it. Unless you're a hand wringing, guilt wracked liberal who frets over the fact that not everyone is equally wealthy.

G. Gordon Liddy is a convicted felon. That does not change the fact that I agree with some of his viewpoints.

And where does this Hannity fellow broadcast out of? I am interested in becoming acquainted with his viewpoints as well.

Sean Hannity

 

[Carbo]

G. Gordon Liddy wasn't President of the United States. Shouldn't we hold that Office to a higher standard? And G. Gordon also did hard time for his crimes.

 

[FoBoT]

like


what is the definition of like


i think i will pass on this poll

i can't associate "like" in either a positive or negative conotation with those two

essentially, they are both entertainers, not unlike britney spears or george clooney

 

[AvesPKS]

Originally posted by: Carbo
G. Gordon Liddy wasn't President of the United States. Shouldn't we hold that Office to a higher standard? And G. Gordon also did hard time for his crimes.

I agree partially with what you say. On an interesting side note, my grandmother drove the schoolbus that his kids rode to school, partially during the time in which he was incarcerated. However, my point is...people are people. There are truly good people, and truly bad people, but basically everybody is in between. Now, I'm not trying to diminish what Bill Clinton did...but the fact that he committed criminal acts does not diminish some of the ways that I look at him.

 

[Carbo]

Fair enough.

 

[Anubis]

neither

 

[AvesPKS]

Originally posted by: Damage

Originally posted by: AvesPKS

Originally posted by: Carbo
outriding, you are out to lunch, too. Your gibberish makes no sense. The Heritage Foundation is a conservative "think tank", (sheesh, I hate that term, btw). What the hell are you talking about "W" saying "nuclear". Shouldn't drink in the afternoon.
Mr. Burns, Clinton is a criminal. He was disbarred for criminal activities, in fact. And as for Rush's image of a Fat Cat, ain't nothing wrong with being successful and enjoying it. Unless you're a hand wringing, guilt wracked liberal who frets over the fact that not everyone is equally wealthy.

G. Gordon Liddy is a convicted felon. That does not change the fact that I agree with some of his viewpoints.

And where does this Hannity fellow broadcast out of? I am interested in becoming acquainted with his viewpoints as well.

Sean Hannity

Thanks for the heads-up. I'm streaming Hannity now.

 

[thraxes]

I start to spasm everytime I hear one of these guys: Although Limbaugh is quite entertaining sometimes when I need a reminder that I am not that dumb afterall 😀

 

[outriding]

Originally posted by: Carbo
G. Gordon Liddy wasn't President of the United States. Shouldn't we hold that Office to a higher standard? And G. Gordon also did hard time for his crimes.

so a coke head is all right then ??

Newt Gingrich had a speech where he revieled one of the duties of the Hertiage foundation. in a nutshell it was too help make decsions for the newly elected republicans. and you complained that the "lefties" dont think for themselves.

exactly what actives was clinton convicted of ?? lying about his personal life ? there is bigger fish to fry than who he boned yesterday

 

[Carbo]

Lying about your personal life is one thing. To do so under oath, while President of the United States is quite another.

 

[jahawkin]

Originally posted by: Carbo
Lying about your personal life is one thing. To do so under oath, while President of the United States is quite another.

How about lying to the American Public about ohhh, say Iraq and al Queda?? Which is worse?? That's right, Clinton was under oath, Bush isn't. Don't worry about the thousands of people that will die because of Bush's little fib. He wasn't under oath.

As for O'reilly, limbaugh, Hannity and the rest of the radio "entertainers" (that's what they call themselves - they don't want to be confused with real debate and policy). Every single one of them would get destroyed by Carville or Begala if they were in a real debate. I'm talking about a fair one, not one where O'Reilly or whoever could get away with talking over the other person, blatant lying, or gross oversimplification.

 

[Carbo]

jahawkin, I couldn't get through your post because you're frothing at the mouth. That aside, let me just say I am not too worried about Iraqui casualties, including civilians. I am more concerned about the American casualties already totaling around 3,000 due to the actions of terrorists, which is what this pending war is about.
Now, go burn some incense and chant, and everything will be OK in your lil' world.

 

[jahawkin]

Originally posted by: Carbo
jahawkin, I couldn't get through your post because you're frothing at the mouth. That aside, let me just say I am not too worried about Iraqui casualties, including civilians. I am more concerned about the American casualties already totaling around 3,000 due to the actions of terrorists, which is what this pending war is about.
Now, go burn some incense and chant, and everything will be OK in your lil' world.

Wow, nice retort to my points. Nice to see in your world Iraqui [sic] lives are less important than American lives.

 

[Damage]

Oriley and Elder both characterize themselves as analysts.. People dismiss them as entertainers.. But their livelehood is in examining and reporting on the happenings.. Not exactly WWE material..

Just ask Maxine Waters.. She calls Mr. Elder an "entertainer", but refuses to debate him because he would evicerate her.