POLL: o'reilly, limbaugh

[Carbo]

Given the choice between saving Iraqi lives or American, I opt for American. I guess I'm funny that way.
I didn't reply to your points because you didn't make any. You said President Bush is lying. I say you're in denial, and you have set yourself up in a warm, fuzzy coccoon. Enjoy it.

 

[Red Dawn]

Originally posted by: Carbo
G. Gordon Liddy wasn't President of the United States. Shouldn't we hold that Office to a higher standard? And G. Gordon also did hard time for his crimes.

Lying about getting his Weasel greased is no big deal and it was none of our business. I'm sure your father qwould have lied about it if he was put under oath too

 

[Damage]

Originally posted by: jahawkin

Originally posted by: Carbo
Lying about your personal life is one thing. To do so under oath, while President of the United States is quite another.

How about lying to the American Public about ohhh, say Iraq and al Queda?? Which is worse?? That's right, Clinton was under oath, Bush isn't. Don't worry about the thousands of people that will die because of Bush's little fib. He wasn't under oath.

Please refer to the two books I listed above for more info than perjury.

 

[jahawkin]

Originally posted by: Carbo
Given the choice between saving Iraqi lives or American, I opt for American. I guess I'm funny that way.
I didn't reply to your points because you didn't make any. You said President Bush is lying. I say you're in denial, and you have set yourself up in a warm, fuzzy coccoon. Enjoy it.

So given the choice between
a. War with Iraq. Thousands of Iraqis will die along with hundreds if not thousands of Americans.
b. No war with Iraq. Saddam might have some weapons which might fall into the hands of some bad people who might use it against americans. Hundreds if not thousands of Amercians might die.
You choose a. Go with the sure thing. Kill thousands of people. Great.
And yes, Bush is lying to the public. Wasn't the Bush Administration (along with Bush himself) linking Iraq to al Queda back in November? Did any of those links prove credible?? No. Wasn't the Bush Administration (along with Bush himself) claiming that Iraq had or was close to having nuclear weapons?? Did any of those claims prove anywhere close to true?? No.
OK, it might not be lying in the technical sense. But it is definatly willful dishonesty towards the public. Just a matter of semantics, eh.