• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

POLL: Is there a moral difference between a $20 streetwalker and a $200+ "WILF" (escort, courteasan, etc)

kinda. If its a slam bam thank you ma'am type thing, it doesn't matter the price. but "courteasans" are a bit different, I mean, a one night stand can cost a couple of hundred dollars sometimes...
 
to me this is like asking

"is there a moral difference between gay/lesbian marriage and polygamy?"
 
Is there a difference between a $1 value meal at Micky D's and a $200 dinner at a 4 star restaurant ?
 
usually the more expensive ones are clean.. and hotter.. streetwalkers are dirty drug whores looking for their next fix
 
no. there's an old saying attributed to winston churchill. (unconfirmed of course)

churchill asked this upper crust type woman at a party "would you sleep with me for $1,000,000?"
"of course!" she says
churchill then says "will you sleep with me for $1"
the woman is shocked and offended. "what kind of woman do you think i am?"
churchill responds "madam, we've already established what you are, now we are merely haggling on the price"
 
Originally posted by: MikeyIs4Dcats
morally? probably not.

But most would go for the high class hooker before the $20 skank without any teeth.
Click to expand...
Without teeth? AWESOME! Speak for yourself buddy!

And I don't see how in the world it could possibly be morally different. If you can't show me a difference, I declare this thread worthless.
 
K...so you take a one night stand out and spend some cash on her with you involved and she spreads the bedsheets for you...

Is she a whore...you know she does it for others?
 
Originally posted by: Ilmater
Originally posted by: MikeyIs4Dcats
morally? probably not.

But most would go for the high class hooker before the $20 skank without any teeth.
Click to expand...
Without teeth? AWESOME! Speak for yourself buddy!

And I don't see how in the world it could possibly be morally different. If you can't show me a difference, I declare this thread worthless.
Click to expand...

I think the moral ambiguity comes from the difference of a streetwalker that actively solicits and a high dollar whore who passively solicits.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top