- Dec 10, 2002
- 2,358
- 0
- 0
...still support the war if you currently support it, or if you're already against it would you begin to support the war or continue to protest it?
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
If the Iraqi's were to attack us with WMD's I would support returning the favor in the form of a battlefield tactical nuke to wipe out the Wog Troops that launched them.
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
If the Iraqi's were to attack us with WMD's I would support returning the favor in the form of a battlefield tactical nuke to wipe out the Wog Troops that launched them.
Originally posted by: Carbonyl
To an Iraqi armed with an AK-47 a abrams tank column or A-10 is a WMD.
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
If VX or Sarin were to be used on American Forces wouldn't their equipment become contaminated? If that were the case what other options would we have but to either withdraw totally or retreat and use Low Yield Tactical Nukes? As long as we don't use them on the civilian population I'd think it would be a appropriate response to the use of Chemical and Biological WMD's
Originally posted by: LordRaiden
...still support the war if you currently support it, or if you're already against it would you begin to support the war or continue to protest it?
Originally posted by: wizardLRU
Originally posted by: LordRaiden
...still support the war if you currently support it, or if you're already against it would you begin to support the war or continue to protest it?
They don't have any WMD.
I don't think he will qualify as a "Saint" but I am pretty sure he will be at the same level of existance soonBut, what the hell....the President is wrong and Saddam is a Saint!
Originally posted by: andreasl
Yes, it's Nuclear, Biological and Chemical weapons. The difference between these weapons and really big conventional bombs (like an airliner loaded full with fuel) is that the effects on these weapons remain in the area LONG after their use. Especially biological weapons. I saw a documentary on TV a while ago about some chinese province that was attacked by a huge cocktail of various WMDs by the japanese during WW2. There are still effects to this day (like Anthrax popping up every now and then, increased mortality among infants, etc etc)
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
If the Iraqi's were to attack us with WMD's I would support returning the favor in the form of a battlefield tactical nuke to wipe out the Wog Troops that launched them.
Take out the Republican Wogs on the outskirts of the city!Originally posted by: MartyTheManiak
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
If the Iraqi's were to attack us with WMD's I would support returning the favor in the form of a battlefield tactical nuke to wipe out the Wog Troops that launched them.
And if it was launched from inside a city - the most likely case?
And then what?Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Take out the Republican Wogs on the outskirts of the city!Originally posted by: MartyTheManiak
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
If the Iraqi's were to attack us with WMD's I would support returning the favor in the form of a battlefield tactical nuke to wipe out the Wog Troops that launched them.
And if it was launched from inside a city - the most likely case?
And then walk in to Baghdad with Reinforcements!Originally posted by: apoppin
And then what?Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Take out the Republican Wogs on the outskirts of the city!Originally posted by: MartyTheManiak
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
If the Iraqi's were to attack us with WMD's I would support returning the favor in the form of a battlefield tactical nuke to wipe out the Wog Troops that launched them.
And if it was launched from inside a city - the most likely case?
Ok, now we're gettin somewhere.Originally posted by: Red Dawn
And then walk in to Baghdad with Reinforcements!Originally posted by: apoppin
And then what?Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Take out the Republican Wogs on the outskirts of the city!Originally posted by: MartyTheManiak
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
If the Iraqi's were to attack us with WMD's I would support returning the favor in the form of a battlefield tactical nuke to wipe out the Wog Troops that launched them.
And if it was launched from inside a city - the most likely case?
Originally posted by: Tominator
Originally posted by: wizardLRU
Originally posted by: LordRaiden
...still support the war if you currently support it, or if you're already against it would you begin to support the war or continue to protest it?
They don't have any WMD.
They have chemical weapons suits. They have pills despensed to soldiers to stop the effects of nerve gas. We have captured weapons that could be used in the dispersal of various chemical and biological includeing drone aircraft that could be used AND we have thousands of gallons on various WMDs that UN inspectors have said Saddam posseses.
He has used them against Iran and his own people several times.
But, what the hell....the President is wrong and Saddam is a Saint!
But, what the hell....the President is wrong and Saddam is a Saint!