Poll: Hey how many cylinders are there in your car engine and 0-60time is?

Page 7 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

RedRooster

Diamond Member
Sep 14, 2000
6,596
0
76
Well, I might as well join in the utter ridiculous bragging thread. Boy, the BS flys around in here!!
I get 3.3 seconds in my Ferrari, yes that's right, a Ferrari. With 7 cylinders(Russian made back in 74), and not only a quad turbo system, but also a 38psi supercharger strapped on as well. I got too much power to feed through the 23" wheels, even with all four of them spinning for the entire quarter mile in 6th gear.

edit-didn't want to single anyone out with my accusations.
 

Sketcher

Platinum Member
Aug 15, 2001
2,237
0
0
I don't know what my Civic or Town & Country do.

I know that my ex-fiance does 0 to Bitch in 1 second. ;)
 

Evadman

Administrator Emeritus<br>Elite Member
Feb 18, 2001
30,990
5
81
Lol, here is what Edmond's says on my truck:

* Length: 224.1 in.
* Width: 79.3 in.
* Height: 72.2 in.
* Weight: 5742 lbs.
* Wheelbase: 138.7 in.
* Ground Clearance: 8.6 in.
* Turning Circle: 47.5 ft.


Haha! My truck is 19 feet long :) And yes, that turning circle is about right. I need 3 parking spots when I park, because I take up the other 2 when I am turning :)

* Acceleration (0-60 mph): NA
* Braking Distance (60-0 mph): NA
* Roadholding Index: NA

LOL Now that is just funny :)

[q/]Those who'd like a little more muscle have a pair of V8s to choose from. Whoa! You're still not satisfied? Like TV's "Tim the Tool Man," you want "more power?" Say no more. Just check the option list and you can barrel homeward with an 8.0-liter V10, blasting out 300 horses, and a locomotive-like 450 foot-pounds of torque. The Magnum V10 is available only in heavy-duty 2500 and 3500 series pickups.[/i] >>



Now that sounds like me. Except I make quite a bit more than that. Doing a neutal drop in 4x4 low is awesome. I can roast 3 of the tires. Nothing gets more stares :)




* Acceleration (0-60 mph): NA
 

cuteybunny

Banned
May 23, 2001
628
0
0
my car has only 50 hrspwr, it would take me at least 30 sec to go from 0 to 60. sad but true:D
this is if I am jamming the gas all the way down but if I do it normally take about
1 min :) you probably want to just run this car down for it is a dinosaur.
 

Jerboy

Banned
Oct 27, 2001
5,190
0
0


<< my car has only 50 hrspwr, it would take me at least 30 sec to go from 0 to 60. sad but true:D
this is if I am jamming the gas all the way down but if I do it normally take about
1 min :) you probably want to just run this car down for it is a dinosaur.
>>




Not amazing if thats in Europe.
 

Jerboy

Banned
Oct 27, 2001
5,190
0
0
Ok! Stupid Math time. Here is the Process for the G's of acceleration at 4000 RPM


4000 RPM.

1000 firings per minute.
8000 Reversals ( Top and bottom. Actually, it would be 7998, but for ruond #'s it is close enough. )


Wouldn't that be 2,000 firings per minute, since four-cycle internal combustion engine ignites every two revs? 1/2 turn=intake, 1/2 turn=compress, 1/2 turn=power stroke, 1/2turn=exhaust

[/b]



Assume the engine has a 3.88 Stroke. ( That is for my V-10. chevy 350 is 3.48 )



Remember, that is average spped in the cyl. Here is a diagram of a cyl to help with the rest of my math.

stopped (Bottom dead center) -- Medium speed -- top speed -- Medium speed -- Stopped (top dead center)

So the average spped (medium) is exactly 1/2 of top speed, whcih means top speed of the piston at 4000 RPM is about 30MPH. Now remeber, the stroke is 3.88 inches, so that piston is accelerationg to 30 MPH in about 1.94 INCHES. That is about the distance from the #1 key to the #4 key on your keyboard. That is insane. A top fuel dragster might hit 30MPH in about 15 feet.


Speeds like this is generally expressed in m/s




Ok, now for the physics. we must Convert to Metrics ( how annoying ) So 1.33 inches = .033782 meters. 30 MPH = 48 KMH = 48000 Meters/minute = 48000/60/60 =

That means that the piston is accelerating to 13.3 meters per second in .033783 meters.


That will give you 393.7m/s^2, or in words, velocity increase by 393.7meters/second, every second.

how annoying? Start with meter to begin with and you'll be a happy camper. I was all confused with inches, meters and crap.
Well you got this wrong.

30mph=48.28km/h =48282meters/HOUR= 13.4meters/second






Plug that into our acceleration forumula. Acceleration = change in velocity / time taken for change.

change in velocity = 13.3 m/s
Time taken = 1/133 second

13.3 / (1/133) = 17728.9 m/s^2 acceleration.
one G is = to 9.81 m/s^2 17728.9 / 9.81 =

1807 G's of acceleration ( my last post was in error as you can see )


Um.. Thats screwed up completely as well.

393.7/9.806=40.14 note: 9.806m/s is gravitational acceleration is and this is referenced as 1G

and you have 40.14G


That means that the 2 lb piston has 3600 LB's of force on it when it is spinning at 4000 RPM. That is about the same as a Lincon town car.

Say .91kg piston has 1.6E04 N of force when it is spinning at 418.9 rad/second .



Not only can you see how much force is on that piston, but you can see how monumentily in-efficent the engine is. If 100% of the force was transfered to the wheels that 3600 LBs of force would be equal to about 1800 Horsepower. And that is only one cyl.


The other cylinder is always pulling in different direction and it smooths it out.

METRIC RULES!!!!


Edit: sorry.. I screwed up so many times on doing the quotes properly.. I'm using bold, cuz its easier to read than italic, but if there's error oh well.
 

Pacfanweb

Lifer
Jan 2, 2000
13,155
59
91
<<A top fuel dragster might hit 30MPH in about 15 feet.>>

Actually, that's pretty close. They do 0-100 in less than 1 second, and 0-60 in approx. .5 sec. Their 60 foot times are about .8.
 

Jerboy

Banned
Oct 27, 2001
5,190
0
0


<< <<A top fuel dragster might hit 30MPH in about 15 feet.>>

Actually, that's pretty close. They do 0-100 in less than 1 second, and 0-60 in approx. .5 sec. Their 60 foot times are about .8.
>>





0-100 in 1 sec would equal average acceleration of 44.7m/s^2 or 4.56G's. Still not enough escape the earth's atmospheric layer.

Has drag race using rocket engines been attempted?
 

Jzero

Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
18,834
1
0


<<

<< <<A top fuel dragster might hit 30MPH in about 15 feet.>>

Actually, that's pretty close. They do 0-100 in less than 1 second, and 0-60 in approx. .5 sec. Their 60 foot times are about .8.
>>





0-100 in 1 sec would equal average acceleration of 44.7m/s^2 or 4.56G's. Still not enough escape the earth's atmospheric layer.

Has drag race using rocket engines been attempted?
>>


Yes, although I think most drag racers frown upon it as cheating. I remember when one dude broke the world land-speed record and a lot of people cried foul b/c what he drove was essentially a spacecraft on wheels. You couldn't even steer it. He just sat in it and fired the ignition and shot across a long, flat mesa.
 

Emos

Golden Member
Oct 27, 2000
1,989
0
0
I can get a 0-60 time of 7 seconds with a good launch. Audi A4 1.8T with APR chip. BTW, nothing in the poll for a four-cylinder turbocharged engine!
 

Evadman

Administrator Emeritus<br>Elite Member
Feb 18, 2001
30,990
5
81
Jerboy:

Sorry, it has been a long time since my physics classes in college :) I am used to Metrics, but almost no one else in these forums is, as most are from the USA. Every other country ( almost anyway ) use the metric system, but we seem to be kinda stuck. I figured I made some mistakes, but I was not so bored that I was gonna look it over :) I did do it in the middle of the night, so my brain was probably already sleepin' :)
 

LAUST

Diamond Member
Sep 13, 2000
8,957
1
81


<< An nitro RC car engine makes 860 HP per liter, with a TOTAL OUTPUT of 3 HP @ 28K RPM. I'd really love to shoot whoever started using specific output (HP/L) as a measure of anything on a car. It is so pointless...why even bring it up? >>


Children do, trying to be gear heads but not having a clue

Thats ONE advantage to living in high altitude, the less displacement the more power loss :D so those kiddies who get their 4 and 6 bangers to run real fast, add a easy 2+ seconds on, the FASTEST street legal import I have EVER seen at Bandimere was a mid 12 second Supra, the guy was capable of 10's at sealevel.

The big Red Racer with a large DISPLACEMENT may have not had the HP/Litre like the supra did but he didn't even lose 1/2 second from the altitude.
 

Gs400TRd

Member
Apr 18, 2001
142
0
0
cars ...my other hobby...
well in my slightly modded gs400 I managed a gtech time of 5.69 0-60. fastest ever was 145 mph...
I still haven't pushed my NSX because I want to baby it and am worried I might break something, but I know it is faster and tighter than the gs. probably can get 5.0 or 4.9 on a good run.
my truck...probably 10 sec 0-60...again I have not tried it since is in the break in period still.
check out the link at the bottom for pics...should have all of them in soon.
 

Jerboy

Banned
Oct 27, 2001
5,190
0
0


<< I just got my G-Tech pro yesterday...

my 94 GMC truck did about 10.3sec :D

18.29 for 1/4 mile @74MPH :D


Now to find out how fast my Camaro SS is :cool:
>>




how did you find out EXACTLY how much your car weighed with you in it? You have to have the weight programmed precisely to have a meaningful reading.
 

Evadman

Administrator Emeritus<br>Elite Member
Feb 18, 2001
30,990
5
81
Jerboy: I used a truck scale. Go to most truck stops, and they have one. They can even tell you how much per tire if you get a good scale.