• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Poll: Do you watch wrestling?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Professional wrestling = insulting crap.

Hope that answers your question.


[edit]
Sorry, that wasn't meant to be inflammatory. It's just how I feel about it, but I have a good friend who loves the stuff. So it's all up to the individual, I suppose. *cough*Although I think the stuff should be banned from network television*cough*.
[/edit]
 
NO, but I did for a while when I went over to my friend's house and he'd be watching it so what else was I suppsoed to do?
 
I know what you're thinking. These guys aren't "real" athletes. The stunts they perform aren't real, and therefore they should be given zero credibility. You're thinking wrestling is no more than fancy women with big guys in tights fake punching each other. You're thinking, "Can you imagine the level of intelligence of a mind that watches wresting?" Do fans realize it's actually "fake"?

Well I'm here to clear up some confusion regarding professional wrestling..

Duh, isn't it scripted?

Yes, but so are TV shows, movies, books, and zillions of other forms of entertainment. And just because it's scripted, it didn't prevent 16 wrestlers from being killed in a span of about 6 years (football had 2 deaths that same period), an endless amount of guys who have had permanent injuries, (such as paralyzation and brain damage), and all the injuries faced day in day out. On any given day, it's said that on any given night at least 25%-40% of the guys wrestling are wrestling with some sort of injury such as broken bones, concussions, etc..

In a "real" sport, guys would be taken off the sidelines and given immediate medical attention of they are knocked out or otherwise severely injured. This isn't the case in wrestling, where guys have been "concussed" and have suffered broken bones, but the show had to go on.

So why watch it when the winners of matches are predetermind?

Same reason people watch anything else, for entertainment. The fact that Friends and other sitcoms are completely scripted doesn't dampen its entertainment quality. If anything, it improves it heavily, because a script allows for any multitude of things to happen that non-fiction just can't offer. And in a fight scene in a movie, i.e. Jackie Chan vs. six white guys, everyone knows Chan will win in the end, and even with the many cuts during the scenes, it's still fun to watch.

Aren't winners of matches so obvious to determine?

In some cases, yes, but no more obvious than the ending of movies where the protagonist goes over 99.9% of the time. Even so, with a full schedule to go on, the "good guys" don't always go over, and the winners is just as indetermined as in a "real" sport.

These guys don't need work hard to "win" if their matches aren't determined then do they?

A guy can only go up the "ladder" if he deserves it. Only guys that are fit enough, and give the impression and believability that he is "good" enough to be on top are up there. Only guys that put in great efforts day in day out are able to make regular appearances on TV and given "pushes", or credibility.

Whenever a wrestler becomes a cancer backstage or no longer gives his best effort every time, he will automatically be "depushed", and will stop making regular appearances. For the most part, guys that are too overweight or need to brush up on their skills are sent to the minor league systems to "tune up" before they have any chance of getting back up.

The average guy in the WWF typically a physique and fitness level as high as any professional football, basketball, hockey, or baseball player, if not higher.

Being a wrestler must be easy, with all the money they make without the struggles of making it there.

The money these guys make are considerably lower than what "real" athletes make. In the WWF, which is the king of wrestling, a majority of them make money in the low 6 figures, while only a handful break 7-figures. While it may sound good, it doesn't come with a medical plan, worker's comp, and even a guarenteed contract. If guys get injured and they can't perform, their pay will reflect it. There's no union either in wrestling either. Of course you can find all these benefits if you're working behind a computer desk all day, but not as a wrestler.
 
when i was maybe 5 i did then grew outta it 6 months later
so NO!
The average guy in the WWF typically a physique and fitness level as high as any professional football, basketball, hockey, or baseball player, if not higher

in any of those sports all the roids wrestlers take would get them banned so quick


edit: oh yeah bigrash9 you should answer your question too
 


<< when i was maybe 5 i did then grew outta it 6 months later
so NO!


edit: oh yeah bigrash9 you should answer your question to
>>

So you quit in the past year?
 

No. Not that it's a waste of time, I waste a couple hours each evening, but wrestling is just too boring and really dumb!

 
Yes, I definitely watch, but only when the story lines are entertaining enough to keep me insterested. It's just plain fun to watch... if you take it at face value. 😀
 
no. and i dont live in a swamp or sleep in a tire.

'no' votes outpacing 'yes' better than 2 to 1 - this has redeeming value for atot.
 
Hell yeah.

I think GoldenBear made some great points. Personally, I think everything we watch on TV is fake and the outcomes are predetermined including all the major sports.

People just saying No cause they're ashamed of admitting that they watch something that is

<< fake >>

. If wrestling didn't interest you people so much, I doubt so many of you would have click on this thread and bother to respond. Unfortunately, I think WWF is suffering recently because the Rock is gone and because some of the things they're doing now makes less sense then usual.
Stone Cold was whipping the floor with Christ Benoit just before Wrestlemania, now all of a sudden they switched roles Benoit is kicking Austin's rear? Even if everything is staged, they got to keep it consistent and at least realistic. You think they learned from the old Ultimate Warrior/Papa Shango stunt they pulled. Also because the audience just refuses to cheer for Benoit and they're still trying to push this guy.
 
&quot;And just because it's scripted, it didn't prevent 16 wrestlers from being killed in a span of about 6 years (football had 2 deaths that same period), an endless amount of guys who have had permanent injuries, (such as paralyzation and brain damage),...&quot;

That's definitely NOT one for the &quot;plus&quot; catagory.

&quot;The money these guys make are considerably lower than what &quot;real&quot; athletes make. In the WWF, which is the king of wrestling, a majority of them make money in the low 6 figures, while only a handful break 7-figures. While it may sound good, it doesn't come with a medical plan, worker's comp, and even a guarenteed contract. If guys get injured and they can't perform, their pay will reflect it. There's no union either in wrestling either.&quot;

Again, another reason that the WWF isn't worth watching. They don't respect their employees.

&quot;In a &quot;real&quot; sport, guys would be taken off the sidelines and given immediate medical attention of they are knocked out or otherwise severely injured. This isn't the case in wrestling, where guys have been &quot;concussed&quot; and have suffered broken bones, but the show had to go on.&quot;

The &quot;show&quot; more important than people's health? What exactly are we teaching our children here?


&quot;The average guy in the WWF typically a physique and fitness level as high as any professional football, basketball, hockey, or baseball player, if not higher.&quot;

That kind of physique can actually be a detriment to flexibility, stamina, dexterity, etc... VERY, very few of these guys (if any, at all) would choose the WWF over the four major sports, if they could. The point is that they couldn't cut it in the major four sports, otherwise they'd be there.


All that being said... No, I don't watch it. I used to when I was a kid. But no longer, and I certainly won't let my seven-year old boy watch it. There's absolutely no redeeming quality about the WWF for a kid.
 


<< yes, but only WWF
wcw is kinda boring
>>



Well.. if you've been watching WWF in the past couple of months, you should know that WCW was bought up.
 
Used to watch it w/ my dad. He loved it. But he passed away a couple months ago. So now I'll look up some info on the WCW boys on occasion to see how they're doing (go Benoit!) Other than that, I don't watch it. But then again, I don't watch anything else, either.
GB- Good post!
 
Again, another reason that the WWF isn't worth watching. They don't respect their employees.

The &quot;show&quot; more important than people's health? What exactly are we teaching our children here?

It's the respect level I'm getting at. If you don't watch, you should at least respect them for what they do, and what they have to go through.

The point is that they couldn't cut it in the major four sports, otherwise they'd be there.

Wrestling is not something you go into when you don't make it into a &quot;sport&quot;. This is someting they've trained all their lives for, much like an NBA of NFL player would.

If you really think it doesn't take the same dedication or skill as a &quot;real sport&quot; does, then you really have no idea what you're talking about. These guys are just athletes, they're performers, stunt devils, and acrobats.


There's absolutely no redeeming quality about the WWF for a kid.

Neither is Friends, Simpsons, or ER. It's entertainment, they don't preach philosophy, talk about the Iliad, or teach Quantum Physics.

And I'm wondering how this thread go to talk about kids?
 
Okay, one more point, I find it very ignorant and just stupid that people are voting NO they don't watch it, but suddenly think they know everything about it?

It's just like the whole crazy AOL ordain, do you somehow think you're better than someone else because of your choice of programming?

If you don't watch it, they okay, but SINCE you don't watch it, how in the world do you know anything about it?

I just find it SOO annoying when people think they're experts on something, when they have ABSOLUTELY NO idea what they're talking about.

And no, watching 3 minutes of it and hearing random stuff from the news every so often does not make you anymore knowledgable than someone who's lived in a cave all their lives.
 
Back
Top