Moral? If you're talking about not "having relations" with an intern in the Oval Office, then you might have a point.Originally posted by: DonaldC
I've never totally trusted any administration but this one seems more moral than the last.
Why should a database like this even be considered? Do you honestly believe that a database of all American consumer purchases will do a fucking thing to prevent terrorism?Originally posted by: Lucky
it should be pointed out that this is _not_ a reality yet and it would be several years away from implementation. the hubbub is coming about because $10 million is being spent to study its possible large scale use.
Originally posted by: reitz
Moral? If you're talking about not "having relations" with an intern in the Oval Office, then you might have a point.Originally posted by: DonaldC
I've never totally trusted any administration but this one seems more moral than the last.
How does a President's sexual conduct, though, have anything to do with how well he leads the nation?
Originally posted by: reitz
Why should a database like this even be considered? Do you honestly believe that a database of all American consumer purchases will do a fucking thing to prevent terrorism?Originally posted by: Lucky
it should be pointed out that this is _not_ a reality yet and it would be several years away from implementation. the hubbub is coming about because $10 million is being spent to study its possible large scale use.
Clinton took illegal(?) campaign contributions from Chinese nationals. Clinton rolled over and gave the Chinese secret rocket and communications technology. Clinton blew up an aspirin factory in "retaliation" for the attack on the USS Cole. Clinton took no real action against a clear and credible terrorist threat.Originally posted by: Hayabusarider
Clinton got a hummer.
I didnt like it
Clinton may have used the FBI to gather information on a few hundred
I didn't like it
Now under Bush's watch, something like this is being contemplated.
No sir, I like it a lot less than both of the above.
The President's policies create this. If the administration was one where heads would roll for this kind of thinking, this would not happen. Bad as Clinton was morally, this is another kind of thing entirely. According to <a class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.darpa.mil/iao/TIASystems.htm" target=blank>this site</A> this department was not created while Bill was getting pleased by Monica. No, I am no longer at ease with this administration if they allow this kind of thinking.
I don't think it is alarmist to make a big deal out of Poindexter's plans. The simple fact that they are even being considered steps way over the line.Originally posted by: Lucky
Originally posted by: reitz
Why should a database like this even be considered? Do you honestly believe that a database of all American consumer purchases will do a fucking thing to prevent terrorism?Originally posted by: Lucky
it should be pointed out that this is _not_ a reality yet and it would be several years away from implementation. the hubbub is coming about because $10 million is being spent to study its possible large scale use.
I never said it should.Just pointing out something that the alarmists seems to be glossing over.
) provides focused warnings within an hour after a triggering event occurs or an evidence threshold is passed; (3) can automatically queue analysts based on partial pattern matches and has patterns that cover 90% of all previously known foreign terrorist attacks; and, (4) supports collaboration, analytical reasoning and information sharing so that analysts can hypothesize, test and propose theories and mitigating strategies about possible futures, so decision-makers can effectively evaluate the impact of current or future policies and prospective courses of action
I can't...I don't believe in god.Originally posted by: JoeBaD
No, reitz,
I trust you.
Will you pleeeeasse be my President.
Idiot thread!
Originally posted by: Electrode
vi_edit said it quite well.
I have no faith whatsoever in the current administration. I am just holding on to a glimmer of hope that, in 2004, the Democrats will be able to make people aware of what is happening and put a stop to it before it's too late.
Plan B of course, is already in motion. I've been looking at real estate in Canada pretty much ever since the spy plane in China thing. No way I'm staying on THIS sinking ship! :Q
Originally posted by: sinunbeso
Though clinton got a little more than he shoud, he is a good president judging by what he did to the country. Bush is just a liar with no shame whatsoever.
Originally posted by: reitz
Moral? If you're talking about not "having relations" with an intern in the Oval Office, then you might have a point.Originally posted by: DonaldC
I've never totally trusted any administration but this one seems more moral than the last.
How does a President's sexual conduct, though, have anything to do with how well he leads the nation?